Cargando…

Using program evaluation to support knowledge translation in an interprofessional primary care team: a case study

BACKGROUND: Evaluation is a fundamental component in building quality primary care and is ideally situated to support individual, team and organizational learning by offering an accessible form of participatory inquiry. The evaluation literature has begun to recognize the unique features of KT evalu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donnelly, Catherine, Shulha, Lyn, Klinger, Don, Letts, Lori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0538-4
_version_ 1782458396603056128
author Donnelly, Catherine
Shulha, Lyn
Klinger, Don
Letts, Lori
author_facet Donnelly, Catherine
Shulha, Lyn
Klinger, Don
Letts, Lori
author_sort Donnelly, Catherine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluation is a fundamental component in building quality primary care and is ideally situated to support individual, team and organizational learning by offering an accessible form of participatory inquiry. The evaluation literature has begun to recognize the unique features of KT evaluations and has described attributes to consider when evaluating KT activities. While both disciplines have focused on the evaluation of KT activities neither has explored the role of evaluation in KT. The purpose of the paper is to examine how participation in program evaluation can support KT in a primary care setting. METHODS: A mixed methods case study design was used, where evaluation was conceptualized as a change process and intervention. A Memory Clinic at an interprofessional primary care clinic was the setting in which the study was conducted. An evaluation framework, Pathways of Influence provided the theoretical foundation to understand how program evaluation can facilitate the translation of knowledge at the level of the individual, inter-personal (Memory Clinic team) and the organization. Data collection included questionnaires, interviews, evaluation log and document analysis. Questionnaires and interviews were administered both before and after the evaluation: Pattern matching was used to analyze the data based on predetermined propositions. RESULTS: Individuals gained program knowledge that resulted in changes to both individual and program practices. One of the key themes was the importance clinicians placed on local, program based knowledge. The evaluation had less influence on the broader health organization. CONCLUSIONS: Program evaluation facilitated individual, team and organizational learning. The use of evaluation to support KT is ideally suited to a primary care setting by offering relevant and applicable knowledge to primary care team members while being sensitive to local context. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0538-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5053347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50533472016-10-19 Using program evaluation to support knowledge translation in an interprofessional primary care team: a case study Donnelly, Catherine Shulha, Lyn Klinger, Don Letts, Lori BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Evaluation is a fundamental component in building quality primary care and is ideally situated to support individual, team and organizational learning by offering an accessible form of participatory inquiry. The evaluation literature has begun to recognize the unique features of KT evaluations and has described attributes to consider when evaluating KT activities. While both disciplines have focused on the evaluation of KT activities neither has explored the role of evaluation in KT. The purpose of the paper is to examine how participation in program evaluation can support KT in a primary care setting. METHODS: A mixed methods case study design was used, where evaluation was conceptualized as a change process and intervention. A Memory Clinic at an interprofessional primary care clinic was the setting in which the study was conducted. An evaluation framework, Pathways of Influence provided the theoretical foundation to understand how program evaluation can facilitate the translation of knowledge at the level of the individual, inter-personal (Memory Clinic team) and the organization. Data collection included questionnaires, interviews, evaluation log and document analysis. Questionnaires and interviews were administered both before and after the evaluation: Pattern matching was used to analyze the data based on predetermined propositions. RESULTS: Individuals gained program knowledge that resulted in changes to both individual and program practices. One of the key themes was the importance clinicians placed on local, program based knowledge. The evaluation had less influence on the broader health organization. CONCLUSIONS: Program evaluation facilitated individual, team and organizational learning. The use of evaluation to support KT is ideally suited to a primary care setting by offering relevant and applicable knowledge to primary care team members while being sensitive to local context. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0538-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5053347/ /pubmed/27716161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0538-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Donnelly, Catherine
Shulha, Lyn
Klinger, Don
Letts, Lori
Using program evaluation to support knowledge translation in an interprofessional primary care team: a case study
title Using program evaluation to support knowledge translation in an interprofessional primary care team: a case study
title_full Using program evaluation to support knowledge translation in an interprofessional primary care team: a case study
title_fullStr Using program evaluation to support knowledge translation in an interprofessional primary care team: a case study
title_full_unstemmed Using program evaluation to support knowledge translation in an interprofessional primary care team: a case study
title_short Using program evaluation to support knowledge translation in an interprofessional primary care team: a case study
title_sort using program evaluation to support knowledge translation in an interprofessional primary care team: a case study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0538-4
work_keys_str_mv AT donnellycatherine usingprogramevaluationtosupportknowledgetranslationinaninterprofessionalprimarycareteamacasestudy
AT shulhalyn usingprogramevaluationtosupportknowledgetranslationinaninterprofessionalprimarycareteamacasestudy
AT klingerdon usingprogramevaluationtosupportknowledgetranslationinaninterprofessionalprimarycareteamacasestudy
AT lettslori usingprogramevaluationtosupportknowledgetranslationinaninterprofessionalprimarycareteamacasestudy