Cargando…

Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics

BACKGROUND: Little is known about action-perception learning processes underlying prosthetic skills in body-powered prosthesis users. Body-powered prostheses are controlled through a harness connected by a cable that might provide for limited proprioceptive feedback. This study aims to test transfer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huinink, Laura H. B., Bouwsema, Hanneke, Plettenburg, Dick H., van der Sluis, Corry K., Bongers, Raoul M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0197-7
_version_ 1782458630971326464
author Huinink, Laura H. B.
Bouwsema, Hanneke
Plettenburg, Dick H.
van der Sluis, Corry K.
Bongers, Raoul M.
author_facet Huinink, Laura H. B.
Bouwsema, Hanneke
Plettenburg, Dick H.
van der Sluis, Corry K.
Bongers, Raoul M.
author_sort Huinink, Laura H. B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about action-perception learning processes underlying prosthetic skills in body-powered prosthesis users. Body-powered prostheses are controlled through a harness connected by a cable that might provide for limited proprioceptive feedback. This study aims to test transfer of training basic tasks to functional tasks and to describe the changes over time in kinematics of basic tasks of novice body-powered prosthesis users. METHODS: Thirty able-bodied participants and 17 controls participated in the study, using a body-powered prosthetic simulator. Participants in the training group were divided over four groups and practiced during a 2-week-period either direct grasping, indirect grasping, fixation, or a combination of these tasks. Deformable objects with different compliances had to be manipulated while kinematic variables and grip force control were assessed. Functional performance was measured with the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) prior to and after the training sessions, and after 2 weeks and 3 months retention. The control group only performed the SHAP tests. RESULTS: All four training groups and the control group improved on the SHAP, also after a period of non-use. Type of training had a small but significant influence on the improvements of the SHAP score. On a kinematic level movement times decreased and hook closing velocities increased over time. The indirect grasping group showed significantly shorter plateau times than the other training groups. Grip force control only improved a little over training. CONCLUSIONS: Training action-perception couplings of body-powered prosthesis in basic tasks transferred to functional tasks and this lasted after a period of non-use. During training movement times decreased and the indirect grasping group showed advantages. It is advisable to start body-powered training with indirect grasping tasks but also to practice hook-object orientations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12984-016-0197-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5054596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50545962016-10-19 Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics Huinink, Laura H. B. Bouwsema, Hanneke Plettenburg, Dick H. van der Sluis, Corry K. Bongers, Raoul M. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Little is known about action-perception learning processes underlying prosthetic skills in body-powered prosthesis users. Body-powered prostheses are controlled through a harness connected by a cable that might provide for limited proprioceptive feedback. This study aims to test transfer of training basic tasks to functional tasks and to describe the changes over time in kinematics of basic tasks of novice body-powered prosthesis users. METHODS: Thirty able-bodied participants and 17 controls participated in the study, using a body-powered prosthetic simulator. Participants in the training group were divided over four groups and practiced during a 2-week-period either direct grasping, indirect grasping, fixation, or a combination of these tasks. Deformable objects with different compliances had to be manipulated while kinematic variables and grip force control were assessed. Functional performance was measured with the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) prior to and after the training sessions, and after 2 weeks and 3 months retention. The control group only performed the SHAP tests. RESULTS: All four training groups and the control group improved on the SHAP, also after a period of non-use. Type of training had a small but significant influence on the improvements of the SHAP score. On a kinematic level movement times decreased and hook closing velocities increased over time. The indirect grasping group showed significantly shorter plateau times than the other training groups. Grip force control only improved a little over training. CONCLUSIONS: Training action-perception couplings of body-powered prosthesis in basic tasks transferred to functional tasks and this lasted after a period of non-use. During training movement times decreased and the indirect grasping group showed advantages. It is advisable to start body-powered training with indirect grasping tasks but also to practice hook-object orientations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12984-016-0197-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5054596/ /pubmed/27716254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0197-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Huinink, Laura H. B.
Bouwsema, Hanneke
Plettenburg, Dick H.
van der Sluis, Corry K.
Bongers, Raoul M.
Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics
title Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics
title_full Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics
title_fullStr Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics
title_full_unstemmed Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics
title_short Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics
title_sort learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0197-7
work_keys_str_mv AT huininklaurahb learningtouseabodypoweredprosthesischangesinfunctionalityandkinematics
AT bouwsemahanneke learningtouseabodypoweredprosthesischangesinfunctionalityandkinematics
AT plettenburgdickh learningtouseabodypoweredprosthesischangesinfunctionalityandkinematics
AT vandersluiscorryk learningtouseabodypoweredprosthesischangesinfunctionalityandkinematics
AT bongersraoulm learningtouseabodypoweredprosthesischangesinfunctionalityandkinematics