Cargando…
The Effectiveness and Cost‐Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina (RASCAL Study): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: Patients with “refractory angina” (RA) unsuitable for coronary revascularization experience high levels of hospitalization and poor health‐related quality of life. Randomized trials have shown spinal cord stimulation (SCS) to be a promising treatment for chronic stable angina and RA; how...
Autores principales: | Eldabe, Sam, Thomson, Simon, Duarte, Rui, Brookes, Morag, deBelder, Mark, Raphael, Jon, Davies, Ed, Taylor, Rod |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26387883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12349 |
Ejemplares similares
-
To Trial or Not to Trial Before Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: The Patients' View From the TRIAL‐STIM Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Chadwick, Raymond, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Randomized Placebo‐/Sham‐Controlled Trials of Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Methodological Appraisal
por: Duarte, Rui V., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Trial Versus No Trial of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: Cost Analysis in United Kingdom National Health Service
por: Duarte, Rui V., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina (RASCAL study): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
por: Eldabe, Sam, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Cost‐Effectiveness Model Shows Superiority of Wireless Spinal Cord Stimulation Implantation Without a Separate Trial
por: North, Richard B., et al.
Publicado: (2020)