Cargando…

Does conservation account for splicing patterns?

BACKGROUND: Alternative mRNA splicing is critical to proteomic diversity and tissue and species differentiation. Exclusion of cassette exons, also called exon skipping, is the most common type of alternative splicing in mammals. RESULTS: We present a computational model that predicts absolute (thoug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wainberg, Michael, Alipanahi, Babak, Frey, Brendan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5055659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27717327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3121-4
_version_ 1782458789076664320
author Wainberg, Michael
Alipanahi, Babak
Frey, Brendan
author_facet Wainberg, Michael
Alipanahi, Babak
Frey, Brendan
author_sort Wainberg, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Alternative mRNA splicing is critical to proteomic diversity and tissue and species differentiation. Exclusion of cassette exons, also called exon skipping, is the most common type of alternative splicing in mammals. RESULTS: We present a computational model that predicts absolute (though not tissue-differential) percent-spliced-in of cassette exons more accurately than previous models, despite not using any ‘hand-crafted’ biological features such as motif counts. We achieve nearly identical performance using only the conservation score (mammalian phastCons) of each splice junction normalized by average conservation over 100 bp of the corresponding flanking intron, demonstrating that conservation is an unexpectedly powerful indicator of alternative splicing patterns. Using this method, we provide evidence that intronic splicing regulation occurs predominantly within 100 bp of the alternative splice sites and that conserved elements in this region are, as expected, functioning as splicing regulators. We show that among conserved cassette exons, increased conservation of flanking introns is associated with reduced inclusion. We also propose a new definition of intronic splicing regulatory elements (ISREs) that is independent of conservation, and show that most ISREs do not match known binding sites or splicing factors despite being predictive of percent-spliced-in. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that one mechanism for the evolutionary transition from constitutive to alternative splicing is the emergence of cis-acting splicing inhibitors. The association of our ISREs with differences in splicing suggests the existence of novel RNA-binding proteins and/or novel splicing roles for known RNA-binding proteins. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3121-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5055659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50556592016-10-19 Does conservation account for splicing patterns? Wainberg, Michael Alipanahi, Babak Frey, Brendan BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Alternative mRNA splicing is critical to proteomic diversity and tissue and species differentiation. Exclusion of cassette exons, also called exon skipping, is the most common type of alternative splicing in mammals. RESULTS: We present a computational model that predicts absolute (though not tissue-differential) percent-spliced-in of cassette exons more accurately than previous models, despite not using any ‘hand-crafted’ biological features such as motif counts. We achieve nearly identical performance using only the conservation score (mammalian phastCons) of each splice junction normalized by average conservation over 100 bp of the corresponding flanking intron, demonstrating that conservation is an unexpectedly powerful indicator of alternative splicing patterns. Using this method, we provide evidence that intronic splicing regulation occurs predominantly within 100 bp of the alternative splice sites and that conserved elements in this region are, as expected, functioning as splicing regulators. We show that among conserved cassette exons, increased conservation of flanking introns is associated with reduced inclusion. We also propose a new definition of intronic splicing regulatory elements (ISREs) that is independent of conservation, and show that most ISREs do not match known binding sites or splicing factors despite being predictive of percent-spliced-in. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that one mechanism for the evolutionary transition from constitutive to alternative splicing is the emergence of cis-acting splicing inhibitors. The association of our ISREs with differences in splicing suggests the existence of novel RNA-binding proteins and/or novel splicing roles for known RNA-binding proteins. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3121-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5055659/ /pubmed/27717327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3121-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wainberg, Michael
Alipanahi, Babak
Frey, Brendan
Does conservation account for splicing patterns?
title Does conservation account for splicing patterns?
title_full Does conservation account for splicing patterns?
title_fullStr Does conservation account for splicing patterns?
title_full_unstemmed Does conservation account for splicing patterns?
title_short Does conservation account for splicing patterns?
title_sort does conservation account for splicing patterns?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5055659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27717327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3121-4
work_keys_str_mv AT wainbergmichael doesconservationaccountforsplicingpatterns
AT alipanahibabak doesconservationaccountforsplicingpatterns
AT freybrendan doesconservationaccountforsplicingpatterns