Cargando…
Mena(INV) mediates synergistic cross-talk between signaling pathways driving chemotaxis and haptotaxis
Directed cell migration, a key process in metastasis, arises from the combined influence of multiple processes, including chemotaxis—the directional movement of cells to soluble cues—and haptotaxis—the migration of cells on gradients of substrate-bound factors. However, it is unclear how chemotactic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The American Society for Cell Biology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27559126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-04-0212 |
_version_ | 1782460013269221376 |
---|---|
author | Oudin, Madeleine J. Miller, Miles A. Klazen, Joelle A. Z. Kosciuk, Tatsiana Lussiez, Alisha Hughes, Shannon K. Tadros, Jenny Bear, James E. Lauffenburger, Douglas A. Gertler, Frank B. |
author_facet | Oudin, Madeleine J. Miller, Miles A. Klazen, Joelle A. Z. Kosciuk, Tatsiana Lussiez, Alisha Hughes, Shannon K. Tadros, Jenny Bear, James E. Lauffenburger, Douglas A. Gertler, Frank B. |
author_sort | Oudin, Madeleine J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Directed cell migration, a key process in metastasis, arises from the combined influence of multiple processes, including chemotaxis—the directional movement of cells to soluble cues—and haptotaxis—the migration of cells on gradients of substrate-bound factors. However, it is unclear how chemotactic and haptotactic pathways integrate with each other to drive overall cell behavior. Mena(INV) has been implicated in metastasis by driving chemotaxis via dysregulation of phosphatase PTP1B and more recently in haptotaxis via interaction with integrin α5β1. Here we find that Mena(INV)-driven haptotaxis on fibronectin (FN) gradients requires intact signaling between α5β1 integrin and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is influenced by PTP1B. Furthermore, we show that Mena(INV)-driven haptotaxis and ECM reorganization both require the Rab-coupling protein RCP, which mediates α5β1 and EGFR recycling. Finally, Mena(INV) promotes synergistic migratory response to combined EGF and FN in vitro and in vivo, leading to hyperinvasive phenotypes. Together our data demonstrate that Mena(INV) is a shared component of multiple prometastatic pathways that amplifies their combined effects, promoting synergistic cross-talk between RTKs and integrins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5063616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50636162016-12-30 Mena(INV) mediates synergistic cross-talk between signaling pathways driving chemotaxis and haptotaxis Oudin, Madeleine J. Miller, Miles A. Klazen, Joelle A. Z. Kosciuk, Tatsiana Lussiez, Alisha Hughes, Shannon K. Tadros, Jenny Bear, James E. Lauffenburger, Douglas A. Gertler, Frank B. Mol Biol Cell Articles Directed cell migration, a key process in metastasis, arises from the combined influence of multiple processes, including chemotaxis—the directional movement of cells to soluble cues—and haptotaxis—the migration of cells on gradients of substrate-bound factors. However, it is unclear how chemotactic and haptotactic pathways integrate with each other to drive overall cell behavior. Mena(INV) has been implicated in metastasis by driving chemotaxis via dysregulation of phosphatase PTP1B and more recently in haptotaxis via interaction with integrin α5β1. Here we find that Mena(INV)-driven haptotaxis on fibronectin (FN) gradients requires intact signaling between α5β1 integrin and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is influenced by PTP1B. Furthermore, we show that Mena(INV)-driven haptotaxis and ECM reorganization both require the Rab-coupling protein RCP, which mediates α5β1 and EGFR recycling. Finally, Mena(INV) promotes synergistic migratory response to combined EGF and FN in vitro and in vivo, leading to hyperinvasive phenotypes. Together our data demonstrate that Mena(INV) is a shared component of multiple prometastatic pathways that amplifies their combined effects, promoting synergistic cross-talk between RTKs and integrins. The American Society for Cell Biology 2016-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5063616/ /pubmed/27559126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-04-0212 Text en © 2016 Oudin et al. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). Two months after publication it is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0). “ASCB®,” “The American Society for Cell Biology®,” and “Molecular Biology of the Cell®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. |
spellingShingle | Articles Oudin, Madeleine J. Miller, Miles A. Klazen, Joelle A. Z. Kosciuk, Tatsiana Lussiez, Alisha Hughes, Shannon K. Tadros, Jenny Bear, James E. Lauffenburger, Douglas A. Gertler, Frank B. Mena(INV) mediates synergistic cross-talk between signaling pathways driving chemotaxis and haptotaxis |
title | Mena(INV) mediates synergistic cross-talk between signaling pathways driving chemotaxis and haptotaxis |
title_full | Mena(INV) mediates synergistic cross-talk between signaling pathways driving chemotaxis and haptotaxis |
title_fullStr | Mena(INV) mediates synergistic cross-talk between signaling pathways driving chemotaxis and haptotaxis |
title_full_unstemmed | Mena(INV) mediates synergistic cross-talk between signaling pathways driving chemotaxis and haptotaxis |
title_short | Mena(INV) mediates synergistic cross-talk between signaling pathways driving chemotaxis and haptotaxis |
title_sort | mena(inv) mediates synergistic cross-talk between signaling pathways driving chemotaxis and haptotaxis |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27559126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-04-0212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oudinmadeleinej menainvmediatessynergisticcrosstalkbetweensignalingpathwaysdrivingchemotaxisandhaptotaxis AT millermilesa menainvmediatessynergisticcrosstalkbetweensignalingpathwaysdrivingchemotaxisandhaptotaxis AT klazenjoelleaz menainvmediatessynergisticcrosstalkbetweensignalingpathwaysdrivingchemotaxisandhaptotaxis AT kosciuktatsiana menainvmediatessynergisticcrosstalkbetweensignalingpathwaysdrivingchemotaxisandhaptotaxis AT lussiezalisha menainvmediatessynergisticcrosstalkbetweensignalingpathwaysdrivingchemotaxisandhaptotaxis AT hughesshannonk menainvmediatessynergisticcrosstalkbetweensignalingpathwaysdrivingchemotaxisandhaptotaxis AT tadrosjenny menainvmediatessynergisticcrosstalkbetweensignalingpathwaysdrivingchemotaxisandhaptotaxis AT bearjamese menainvmediatessynergisticcrosstalkbetweensignalingpathwaysdrivingchemotaxisandhaptotaxis AT lauffenburgerdouglasa menainvmediatessynergisticcrosstalkbetweensignalingpathwaysdrivingchemotaxisandhaptotaxis AT gertlerfrankb menainvmediatessynergisticcrosstalkbetweensignalingpathwaysdrivingchemotaxisandhaptotaxis |