Cargando…
The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core
The sensory properties of a reward-paired cue (a conditioned stimulus; CS) may impact the motivational value attributed to the cue, and in turn influence the form of the conditioned response (CR) that develops. A cue with multiple sensory qualities, such as a moving lever-CS, may activate numerous n...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27918279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.043026.116 |
_version_ | 1782460512386154496 |
---|---|
author | Singer, Bryan F. Bryan, Myranda A. Popov, Pavlo Scarff, Raymond Carter, Cody Wright, Erin Aragona, Brandon J. Robinson, Terry E. |
author_facet | Singer, Bryan F. Bryan, Myranda A. Popov, Pavlo Scarff, Raymond Carter, Cody Wright, Erin Aragona, Brandon J. Robinson, Terry E. |
author_sort | Singer, Bryan F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The sensory properties of a reward-paired cue (a conditioned stimulus; CS) may impact the motivational value attributed to the cue, and in turn influence the form of the conditioned response (CR) that develops. A cue with multiple sensory qualities, such as a moving lever-CS, may activate numerous neural pathways that process auditory and visual information, resulting in CRs that vary both within and between individuals. For example, CRs include approach to the lever-CS itself (rats that “sign-track”; ST), approach to the location of reward delivery (rats that “goal-track”; GT), or an “intermediate” combination of these behaviors. We found that the multimodal sensory features of the lever-CS were important to the development and expression of sign-tracking. When the lever-CS was covered, and thus could only be heard moving, STs not only continued to approach the lever location but also started to approach the food cup during the CS period. While still predictive of reward, the auditory component of the lever-CS was a much weaker conditioned reinforcer than the visible lever-CS. This plasticity in behavioral responding observed in STs closely resembled behaviors normally seen in rats classified as “intermediates.” Furthermore, the ability of both the lever-CS and the reward-delivery to evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens was also altered by covering the lever—dopamine signaling in STs resembled neurotransmission observed in rats that normally only GT. These data suggest that while the visible lever-CS was attractive, wanted, and had incentive value for STs, when presented in isolation, the auditory component of the cue was simply predictive of reward, lacking incentive salience. Therefore, the specific sensory features of cues may differentially contribute to responding and ensure behavioral flexibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5066606 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50666062017-11-01 The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core Singer, Bryan F. Bryan, Myranda A. Popov, Pavlo Scarff, Raymond Carter, Cody Wright, Erin Aragona, Brandon J. Robinson, Terry E. Learn Mem Research The sensory properties of a reward-paired cue (a conditioned stimulus; CS) may impact the motivational value attributed to the cue, and in turn influence the form of the conditioned response (CR) that develops. A cue with multiple sensory qualities, such as a moving lever-CS, may activate numerous neural pathways that process auditory and visual information, resulting in CRs that vary both within and between individuals. For example, CRs include approach to the lever-CS itself (rats that “sign-track”; ST), approach to the location of reward delivery (rats that “goal-track”; GT), or an “intermediate” combination of these behaviors. We found that the multimodal sensory features of the lever-CS were important to the development and expression of sign-tracking. When the lever-CS was covered, and thus could only be heard moving, STs not only continued to approach the lever location but also started to approach the food cup during the CS period. While still predictive of reward, the auditory component of the lever-CS was a much weaker conditioned reinforcer than the visible lever-CS. This plasticity in behavioral responding observed in STs closely resembled behaviors normally seen in rats classified as “intermediates.” Furthermore, the ability of both the lever-CS and the reward-delivery to evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens was also altered by covering the lever—dopamine signaling in STs resembled neurotransmission observed in rats that normally only GT. These data suggest that while the visible lever-CS was attractive, wanted, and had incentive value for STs, when presented in isolation, the auditory component of the cue was simply predictive of reward, lacking incentive salience. Therefore, the specific sensory features of cues may differentially contribute to responding and ensure behavioral flexibility. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5066606/ /pubmed/27918279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.043026.116 Text en © 2016 Singer et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first 12 months after the full-issue publication date (see http://learnmem.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After 12 months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Singer, Bryan F. Bryan, Myranda A. Popov, Pavlo Scarff, Raymond Carter, Cody Wright, Erin Aragona, Brandon J. Robinson, Terry E. The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core |
title | The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core |
title_full | The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core |
title_fullStr | The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core |
title_full_unstemmed | The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core |
title_short | The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core |
title_sort | sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27918279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.043026.116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singerbryanf thesensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore AT bryanmyrandaa thesensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore AT popovpavlo thesensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore AT scarffraymond thesensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore AT cartercody thesensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore AT wrighterin thesensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore AT aragonabrandonj thesensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore AT robinsonterrye thesensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore AT singerbryanf sensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore AT bryanmyrandaa sensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore AT popovpavlo sensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore AT scarffraymond sensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore AT cartercody sensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore AT wrighterin sensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore AT aragonabrandonj sensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore AT robinsonterrye sensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore |