Cargando…

The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core

The sensory properties of a reward-paired cue (a conditioned stimulus; CS) may impact the motivational value attributed to the cue, and in turn influence the form of the conditioned response (CR) that develops. A cue with multiple sensory qualities, such as a moving lever-CS, may activate numerous n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singer, Bryan F., Bryan, Myranda A., Popov, Pavlo, Scarff, Raymond, Carter, Cody, Wright, Erin, Aragona, Brandon J., Robinson, Terry E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27918279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.043026.116
_version_ 1782460512386154496
author Singer, Bryan F.
Bryan, Myranda A.
Popov, Pavlo
Scarff, Raymond
Carter, Cody
Wright, Erin
Aragona, Brandon J.
Robinson, Terry E.
author_facet Singer, Bryan F.
Bryan, Myranda A.
Popov, Pavlo
Scarff, Raymond
Carter, Cody
Wright, Erin
Aragona, Brandon J.
Robinson, Terry E.
author_sort Singer, Bryan F.
collection PubMed
description The sensory properties of a reward-paired cue (a conditioned stimulus; CS) may impact the motivational value attributed to the cue, and in turn influence the form of the conditioned response (CR) that develops. A cue with multiple sensory qualities, such as a moving lever-CS, may activate numerous neural pathways that process auditory and visual information, resulting in CRs that vary both within and between individuals. For example, CRs include approach to the lever-CS itself (rats that “sign-track”; ST), approach to the location of reward delivery (rats that “goal-track”; GT), or an “intermediate” combination of these behaviors. We found that the multimodal sensory features of the lever-CS were important to the development and expression of sign-tracking. When the lever-CS was covered, and thus could only be heard moving, STs not only continued to approach the lever location but also started to approach the food cup during the CS period. While still predictive of reward, the auditory component of the lever-CS was a much weaker conditioned reinforcer than the visible lever-CS. This plasticity in behavioral responding observed in STs closely resembled behaviors normally seen in rats classified as “intermediates.” Furthermore, the ability of both the lever-CS and the reward-delivery to evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens was also altered by covering the lever—dopamine signaling in STs resembled neurotransmission observed in rats that normally only GT. These data suggest that while the visible lever-CS was attractive, wanted, and had incentive value for STs, when presented in isolation, the auditory component of the cue was simply predictive of reward, lacking incentive salience. Therefore, the specific sensory features of cues may differentially contribute to responding and ensure behavioral flexibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5066606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50666062017-11-01 The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core Singer, Bryan F. Bryan, Myranda A. Popov, Pavlo Scarff, Raymond Carter, Cody Wright, Erin Aragona, Brandon J. Robinson, Terry E. Learn Mem Research The sensory properties of a reward-paired cue (a conditioned stimulus; CS) may impact the motivational value attributed to the cue, and in turn influence the form of the conditioned response (CR) that develops. A cue with multiple sensory qualities, such as a moving lever-CS, may activate numerous neural pathways that process auditory and visual information, resulting in CRs that vary both within and between individuals. For example, CRs include approach to the lever-CS itself (rats that “sign-track”; ST), approach to the location of reward delivery (rats that “goal-track”; GT), or an “intermediate” combination of these behaviors. We found that the multimodal sensory features of the lever-CS were important to the development and expression of sign-tracking. When the lever-CS was covered, and thus could only be heard moving, STs not only continued to approach the lever location but also started to approach the food cup during the CS period. While still predictive of reward, the auditory component of the lever-CS was a much weaker conditioned reinforcer than the visible lever-CS. This plasticity in behavioral responding observed in STs closely resembled behaviors normally seen in rats classified as “intermediates.” Furthermore, the ability of both the lever-CS and the reward-delivery to evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens was also altered by covering the lever—dopamine signaling in STs resembled neurotransmission observed in rats that normally only GT. These data suggest that while the visible lever-CS was attractive, wanted, and had incentive value for STs, when presented in isolation, the auditory component of the cue was simply predictive of reward, lacking incentive salience. Therefore, the specific sensory features of cues may differentially contribute to responding and ensure behavioral flexibility. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5066606/ /pubmed/27918279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.043026.116 Text en © 2016 Singer et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first 12 months after the full-issue publication date (see http://learnmem.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After 12 months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Singer, Bryan F.
Bryan, Myranda A.
Popov, Pavlo
Scarff, Raymond
Carter, Cody
Wright, Erin
Aragona, Brandon J.
Robinson, Terry E.
The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core
title The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core
title_full The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core
title_fullStr The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core
title_full_unstemmed The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core
title_short The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core
title_sort sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27918279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.043026.116
work_keys_str_mv AT singerbryanf thesensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore
AT bryanmyrandaa thesensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore
AT popovpavlo thesensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore
AT scarffraymond thesensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore
AT cartercody thesensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore
AT wrighterin thesensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore
AT aragonabrandonj thesensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore
AT robinsonterrye thesensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore
AT singerbryanf sensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore
AT bryanmyrandaa sensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore
AT popovpavlo sensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore
AT scarffraymond sensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore
AT cartercody sensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore
AT wrighterin sensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore
AT aragonabrandonj sensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore
AT robinsonterrye sensoryfeaturesofafoodcueinfluenceitsabilitytoactasanincentivestimulusandevokedopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbenscore