Cargando…

Toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons

BACKGROUND: To date, there seems to be limited-to-zero emphasis about how consumers perceive crustacean products subject to either chemical and or non-chemical preservative treatments. In addition, studies that investigated price comparisons of crustacean products subject to either chemical or chemi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okpala, Charles Odilichukwu R., Bono, Gioacchino, Pipitone, Vito, Vitale, Sergio, Cannizzaro, Leonardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799084
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v60.30955
_version_ 1782464076684722176
author Okpala, Charles Odilichukwu R.
Bono, Gioacchino
Pipitone, Vito
Vitale, Sergio
Cannizzaro, Leonardo
author_facet Okpala, Charles Odilichukwu R.
Bono, Gioacchino
Pipitone, Vito
Vitale, Sergio
Cannizzaro, Leonardo
author_sort Okpala, Charles Odilichukwu R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To date, there seems to be limited-to-zero emphasis about how consumers perceive crustacean products subject to either chemical and or non-chemical preservative treatments. In addition, studies that investigated price comparisons of crustacean products subject to either chemical or chemical-free preservative methods seem unreported. OBJECTIVE: This study focused on providing some foundational knowledge about how consumers perceive traditionally harvested crustaceans that are either chemical-treated and or free of chemicals, incorporating price comparisons using a descriptive approach. DESIGN: The study design employed a questionnaire approach via interview using a computer-assisted telephone system and sampled 1,540 participants across five key locations in Italy. To actualize consumer sensitivity, ‘price’ was the focus given its crucial role as a consumption barrier. Prior to this, variables such as demographic characteristics of participants, frequency of purchasing, quality attributes/factors that limit the consumption of crustaceans were equally considered. RESULTS: By price comparisons, consumers are likely to favor chemical-free (modified atmosphere packaging) crustacean products amid a price increase of up to 15%. But, a further price increase such as by 25% could markedly damage consumers’ feelings, which might lead to a considerable number opting out in favor of either chemical-treated or other seafood products. Comparing locations, the studied variables showed no statistical differences (p>0.05). On the contrary, the response weightings fluctuated across the studied categories. Both response weightings and coefficient of variation helped reveal more about how responses deviated per variable categories. CONCLUSIONS: This study has revealed some foundational knowledge about how consumers perceive traditionally harvested crustaceans that were either chemical-treated or subject to chemical-free preservative up to price sensitivity using Italy as a reference case, which is applicable to other parts of the globe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5088346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50883462016-11-17 Toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons Okpala, Charles Odilichukwu R. Bono, Gioacchino Pipitone, Vito Vitale, Sergio Cannizzaro, Leonardo Food Nutr Res Original Article BACKGROUND: To date, there seems to be limited-to-zero emphasis about how consumers perceive crustacean products subject to either chemical and or non-chemical preservative treatments. In addition, studies that investigated price comparisons of crustacean products subject to either chemical or chemical-free preservative methods seem unreported. OBJECTIVE: This study focused on providing some foundational knowledge about how consumers perceive traditionally harvested crustaceans that are either chemical-treated and or free of chemicals, incorporating price comparisons using a descriptive approach. DESIGN: The study design employed a questionnaire approach via interview using a computer-assisted telephone system and sampled 1,540 participants across five key locations in Italy. To actualize consumer sensitivity, ‘price’ was the focus given its crucial role as a consumption barrier. Prior to this, variables such as demographic characteristics of participants, frequency of purchasing, quality attributes/factors that limit the consumption of crustaceans were equally considered. RESULTS: By price comparisons, consumers are likely to favor chemical-free (modified atmosphere packaging) crustacean products amid a price increase of up to 15%. But, a further price increase such as by 25% could markedly damage consumers’ feelings, which might lead to a considerable number opting out in favor of either chemical-treated or other seafood products. Comparing locations, the studied variables showed no statistical differences (p>0.05). On the contrary, the response weightings fluctuated across the studied categories. Both response weightings and coefficient of variation helped reveal more about how responses deviated per variable categories. CONCLUSIONS: This study has revealed some foundational knowledge about how consumers perceive traditionally harvested crustaceans that were either chemical-treated or subject to chemical-free preservative up to price sensitivity using Italy as a reference case, which is applicable to other parts of the globe. Co-Action Publishing 2016-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5088346/ /pubmed/27799084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v60.30955 Text en © 2016 Charles Odilichukwu R. Okpala et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Article
Okpala, Charles Odilichukwu R.
Bono, Gioacchino
Pipitone, Vito
Vitale, Sergio
Cannizzaro, Leonardo
Toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons
title Toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons
title_full Toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons
title_fullStr Toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons
title_full_unstemmed Toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons
title_short Toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons
title_sort toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799084
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v60.30955
work_keys_str_mv AT okpalacharlesodilichukwur towardcrustaceanwithoutchemicalsadescriptiveanalysisofconsumerresponseusingpricecomparisons
AT bonogioacchino towardcrustaceanwithoutchemicalsadescriptiveanalysisofconsumerresponseusingpricecomparisons
AT pipitonevito towardcrustaceanwithoutchemicalsadescriptiveanalysisofconsumerresponseusingpricecomparisons
AT vitalesergio towardcrustaceanwithoutchemicalsadescriptiveanalysisofconsumerresponseusingpricecomparisons
AT cannizzaroleonardo towardcrustaceanwithoutchemicalsadescriptiveanalysisofconsumerresponseusingpricecomparisons