Cargando…
Toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons
BACKGROUND: To date, there seems to be limited-to-zero emphasis about how consumers perceive crustacean products subject to either chemical and or non-chemical preservative treatments. In addition, studies that investigated price comparisons of crustacean products subject to either chemical or chemi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Co-Action Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v60.30955 |
_version_ | 1782464076684722176 |
---|---|
author | Okpala, Charles Odilichukwu R. Bono, Gioacchino Pipitone, Vito Vitale, Sergio Cannizzaro, Leonardo |
author_facet | Okpala, Charles Odilichukwu R. Bono, Gioacchino Pipitone, Vito Vitale, Sergio Cannizzaro, Leonardo |
author_sort | Okpala, Charles Odilichukwu R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To date, there seems to be limited-to-zero emphasis about how consumers perceive crustacean products subject to either chemical and or non-chemical preservative treatments. In addition, studies that investigated price comparisons of crustacean products subject to either chemical or chemical-free preservative methods seem unreported. OBJECTIVE: This study focused on providing some foundational knowledge about how consumers perceive traditionally harvested crustaceans that are either chemical-treated and or free of chemicals, incorporating price comparisons using a descriptive approach. DESIGN: The study design employed a questionnaire approach via interview using a computer-assisted telephone system and sampled 1,540 participants across five key locations in Italy. To actualize consumer sensitivity, ‘price’ was the focus given its crucial role as a consumption barrier. Prior to this, variables such as demographic characteristics of participants, frequency of purchasing, quality attributes/factors that limit the consumption of crustaceans were equally considered. RESULTS: By price comparisons, consumers are likely to favor chemical-free (modified atmosphere packaging) crustacean products amid a price increase of up to 15%. But, a further price increase such as by 25% could markedly damage consumers’ feelings, which might lead to a considerable number opting out in favor of either chemical-treated or other seafood products. Comparing locations, the studied variables showed no statistical differences (p>0.05). On the contrary, the response weightings fluctuated across the studied categories. Both response weightings and coefficient of variation helped reveal more about how responses deviated per variable categories. CONCLUSIONS: This study has revealed some foundational knowledge about how consumers perceive traditionally harvested crustaceans that were either chemical-treated or subject to chemical-free preservative up to price sensitivity using Italy as a reference case, which is applicable to other parts of the globe. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5088346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Co-Action Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50883462016-11-17 Toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons Okpala, Charles Odilichukwu R. Bono, Gioacchino Pipitone, Vito Vitale, Sergio Cannizzaro, Leonardo Food Nutr Res Original Article BACKGROUND: To date, there seems to be limited-to-zero emphasis about how consumers perceive crustacean products subject to either chemical and or non-chemical preservative treatments. In addition, studies that investigated price comparisons of crustacean products subject to either chemical or chemical-free preservative methods seem unreported. OBJECTIVE: This study focused on providing some foundational knowledge about how consumers perceive traditionally harvested crustaceans that are either chemical-treated and or free of chemicals, incorporating price comparisons using a descriptive approach. DESIGN: The study design employed a questionnaire approach via interview using a computer-assisted telephone system and sampled 1,540 participants across five key locations in Italy. To actualize consumer sensitivity, ‘price’ was the focus given its crucial role as a consumption barrier. Prior to this, variables such as demographic characteristics of participants, frequency of purchasing, quality attributes/factors that limit the consumption of crustaceans were equally considered. RESULTS: By price comparisons, consumers are likely to favor chemical-free (modified atmosphere packaging) crustacean products amid a price increase of up to 15%. But, a further price increase such as by 25% could markedly damage consumers’ feelings, which might lead to a considerable number opting out in favor of either chemical-treated or other seafood products. Comparing locations, the studied variables showed no statistical differences (p>0.05). On the contrary, the response weightings fluctuated across the studied categories. Both response weightings and coefficient of variation helped reveal more about how responses deviated per variable categories. CONCLUSIONS: This study has revealed some foundational knowledge about how consumers perceive traditionally harvested crustaceans that were either chemical-treated or subject to chemical-free preservative up to price sensitivity using Italy as a reference case, which is applicable to other parts of the globe. Co-Action Publishing 2016-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5088346/ /pubmed/27799084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v60.30955 Text en © 2016 Charles Odilichukwu R. Okpala et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Okpala, Charles Odilichukwu R. Bono, Gioacchino Pipitone, Vito Vitale, Sergio Cannizzaro, Leonardo Toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons |
title | Toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons |
title_full | Toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons |
title_fullStr | Toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons |
title_full_unstemmed | Toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons |
title_short | Toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons |
title_sort | toward crustacean without chemicals: a descriptive analysis of consumer response using price comparisons |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v60.30955 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okpalacharlesodilichukwur towardcrustaceanwithoutchemicalsadescriptiveanalysisofconsumerresponseusingpricecomparisons AT bonogioacchino towardcrustaceanwithoutchemicalsadescriptiveanalysisofconsumerresponseusingpricecomparisons AT pipitonevito towardcrustaceanwithoutchemicalsadescriptiveanalysisofconsumerresponseusingpricecomparisons AT vitalesergio towardcrustaceanwithoutchemicalsadescriptiveanalysisofconsumerresponseusingpricecomparisons AT cannizzaroleonardo towardcrustaceanwithoutchemicalsadescriptiveanalysisofconsumerresponseusingpricecomparisons |