Cargando…

A Shorter Route to Antibody Binders via Quantitative in vitro Bead-Display Screening and Consensus Analysis

Affinity panning of large libraries is a powerful tool to identify protein binders. However, panning rounds are followed by the tedious re-screening of the clones obtained to evaluate binders precisely. In a first application of Bead Surface Display (BeSD) we show successful in vitro affinity select...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mankowska, Sylwia A., Gatti-Lafranconi, Pietro, Chodorge, Matthieu, Sridharan, Sudharsan, Minter, Ralph R., Hollfelder, Florian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27819305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36391
_version_ 1782465749581824000
author Mankowska, Sylwia A.
Gatti-Lafranconi, Pietro
Chodorge, Matthieu
Sridharan, Sudharsan
Minter, Ralph R.
Hollfelder, Florian
author_facet Mankowska, Sylwia A.
Gatti-Lafranconi, Pietro
Chodorge, Matthieu
Sridharan, Sudharsan
Minter, Ralph R.
Hollfelder, Florian
author_sort Mankowska, Sylwia A.
collection PubMed
description Affinity panning of large libraries is a powerful tool to identify protein binders. However, panning rounds are followed by the tedious re-screening of the clones obtained to evaluate binders precisely. In a first application of Bead Surface Display (BeSD) we show successful in vitro affinity selections based on flow cytometric analysis that allows fine quantitative discrimination between binders. Subsequent consensus analysis of the resulting sequences enables identification of clones that bind tighter than those arising directly from the experimental selection output. This is demonstrated by evolution of an anti-Fas receptor single-chain variable fragment (scFv) that was improved 98-fold vs the parental clone. Four rounds of quantitative screening by fluorescence-activated cell sorting of an error-prone library based on fine discrimination between binders in BeSD were followed by analysis of 200 full-length output sequences that suggested a new consensus design with a K(d) ∼140 pM. This approach shortens the time and effort to obtain high affinity reagents and its cell-free nature transcends limitations inherent in previous in vivo display systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5098251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50982512016-11-10 A Shorter Route to Antibody Binders via Quantitative in vitro Bead-Display Screening and Consensus Analysis Mankowska, Sylwia A. Gatti-Lafranconi, Pietro Chodorge, Matthieu Sridharan, Sudharsan Minter, Ralph R. Hollfelder, Florian Sci Rep Article Affinity panning of large libraries is a powerful tool to identify protein binders. However, panning rounds are followed by the tedious re-screening of the clones obtained to evaluate binders precisely. In a first application of Bead Surface Display (BeSD) we show successful in vitro affinity selections based on flow cytometric analysis that allows fine quantitative discrimination between binders. Subsequent consensus analysis of the resulting sequences enables identification of clones that bind tighter than those arising directly from the experimental selection output. This is demonstrated by evolution of an anti-Fas receptor single-chain variable fragment (scFv) that was improved 98-fold vs the parental clone. Four rounds of quantitative screening by fluorescence-activated cell sorting of an error-prone library based on fine discrimination between binders in BeSD were followed by analysis of 200 full-length output sequences that suggested a new consensus design with a K(d) ∼140 pM. This approach shortens the time and effort to obtain high affinity reagents and its cell-free nature transcends limitations inherent in previous in vivo display systems. Nature Publishing Group 2016-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5098251/ /pubmed/27819305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36391 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Mankowska, Sylwia A.
Gatti-Lafranconi, Pietro
Chodorge, Matthieu
Sridharan, Sudharsan
Minter, Ralph R.
Hollfelder, Florian
A Shorter Route to Antibody Binders via Quantitative in vitro Bead-Display Screening and Consensus Analysis
title A Shorter Route to Antibody Binders via Quantitative in vitro Bead-Display Screening and Consensus Analysis
title_full A Shorter Route to Antibody Binders via Quantitative in vitro Bead-Display Screening and Consensus Analysis
title_fullStr A Shorter Route to Antibody Binders via Quantitative in vitro Bead-Display Screening and Consensus Analysis
title_full_unstemmed A Shorter Route to Antibody Binders via Quantitative in vitro Bead-Display Screening and Consensus Analysis
title_short A Shorter Route to Antibody Binders via Quantitative in vitro Bead-Display Screening and Consensus Analysis
title_sort shorter route to antibody binders via quantitative in vitro bead-display screening and consensus analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27819305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36391
work_keys_str_mv AT mankowskasylwiaa ashorterroutetoantibodybindersviaquantitativeinvitrobeaddisplayscreeningandconsensusanalysis
AT gattilafranconipietro ashorterroutetoantibodybindersviaquantitativeinvitrobeaddisplayscreeningandconsensusanalysis
AT chodorgematthieu ashorterroutetoantibodybindersviaquantitativeinvitrobeaddisplayscreeningandconsensusanalysis
AT sridharansudharsan ashorterroutetoantibodybindersviaquantitativeinvitrobeaddisplayscreeningandconsensusanalysis
AT minterralphr ashorterroutetoantibodybindersviaquantitativeinvitrobeaddisplayscreeningandconsensusanalysis
AT hollfelderflorian ashorterroutetoantibodybindersviaquantitativeinvitrobeaddisplayscreeningandconsensusanalysis
AT mankowskasylwiaa shorterroutetoantibodybindersviaquantitativeinvitrobeaddisplayscreeningandconsensusanalysis
AT gattilafranconipietro shorterroutetoantibodybindersviaquantitativeinvitrobeaddisplayscreeningandconsensusanalysis
AT chodorgematthieu shorterroutetoantibodybindersviaquantitativeinvitrobeaddisplayscreeningandconsensusanalysis
AT sridharansudharsan shorterroutetoantibodybindersviaquantitativeinvitrobeaddisplayscreeningandconsensusanalysis
AT minterralphr shorterroutetoantibodybindersviaquantitativeinvitrobeaddisplayscreeningandconsensusanalysis
AT hollfelderflorian shorterroutetoantibodybindersviaquantitativeinvitrobeaddisplayscreeningandconsensusanalysis