Cargando…

Autoregressive transitional ordinal model to test for treatment effect in neurological trials with complex endpoints

BACKGROUND: A number of potential therapeutic approaches for neurological disorders have failed to provide convincing evidence of efficacy, prompting pharmaceutical and health companies to discontinue their involvement in drug development. Limitations in the statistical analysis of complex endpoints...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanadini, Lorenzo G., Steeves, John D., Curt, Armin, Hothorn, Torsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0251-y
_version_ 1782466085832884224
author Tanadini, Lorenzo G.
Steeves, John D.
Curt, Armin
Hothorn, Torsten
author_facet Tanadini, Lorenzo G.
Steeves, John D.
Curt, Armin
Hothorn, Torsten
author_sort Tanadini, Lorenzo G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A number of potential therapeutic approaches for neurological disorders have failed to provide convincing evidence of efficacy, prompting pharmaceutical and health companies to discontinue their involvement in drug development. Limitations in the statistical analysis of complex endpoints have very likely had a negative impact on the translational process. METHODS: We propose a transitional ordinal model with an autoregressive component to overcome previous limitations in the analysis of Upper Extremity Motor Scores, a relevant endpoint in the field of Spinal Cord Injury. Statistical power and clinical interpretation of estimated treatment effects of the proposed model were compared to routinely employed approaches in a large simulation study of two-arm randomized clinical trials. A revisitation of a key historical trial provides further comparison between the different analysis approaches. RESULTS: The proposed model outperformed all other approaches in virtually all simulation settings, achieving on average 14 % higher statistical power than the respective second-best performing approach (range: -1 %, +34 %). Only the transitional model allows treatment effect estimates to be interpreted as conditional odds ratios, providing clear interpretation and visualization. CONCLUSION: The proposed model takes into account the complex ordinal nature of the endpoint under investigation and explicitly accounts for relevant prognostic factors such as lesion level and baseline information. Superior statistical power, combined with clear clinical interpretation of estimated treatment effects and widespread availability in commercial software, are strong arguments for clinicians and trial scientists to adopt, and further extend, the proposed approach. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0251-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5100172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51001722016-11-08 Autoregressive transitional ordinal model to test for treatment effect in neurological trials with complex endpoints Tanadini, Lorenzo G. Steeves, John D. Curt, Armin Hothorn, Torsten BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: A number of potential therapeutic approaches for neurological disorders have failed to provide convincing evidence of efficacy, prompting pharmaceutical and health companies to discontinue their involvement in drug development. Limitations in the statistical analysis of complex endpoints have very likely had a negative impact on the translational process. METHODS: We propose a transitional ordinal model with an autoregressive component to overcome previous limitations in the analysis of Upper Extremity Motor Scores, a relevant endpoint in the field of Spinal Cord Injury. Statistical power and clinical interpretation of estimated treatment effects of the proposed model were compared to routinely employed approaches in a large simulation study of two-arm randomized clinical trials. A revisitation of a key historical trial provides further comparison between the different analysis approaches. RESULTS: The proposed model outperformed all other approaches in virtually all simulation settings, achieving on average 14 % higher statistical power than the respective second-best performing approach (range: -1 %, +34 %). Only the transitional model allows treatment effect estimates to be interpreted as conditional odds ratios, providing clear interpretation and visualization. CONCLUSION: The proposed model takes into account the complex ordinal nature of the endpoint under investigation and explicitly accounts for relevant prognostic factors such as lesion level and baseline information. Superior statistical power, combined with clear clinical interpretation of estimated treatment effects and widespread availability in commercial software, are strong arguments for clinicians and trial scientists to adopt, and further extend, the proposed approach. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0251-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5100172/ /pubmed/27821067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0251-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tanadini, Lorenzo G.
Steeves, John D.
Curt, Armin
Hothorn, Torsten
Autoregressive transitional ordinal model to test for treatment effect in neurological trials with complex endpoints
title Autoregressive transitional ordinal model to test for treatment effect in neurological trials with complex endpoints
title_full Autoregressive transitional ordinal model to test for treatment effect in neurological trials with complex endpoints
title_fullStr Autoregressive transitional ordinal model to test for treatment effect in neurological trials with complex endpoints
title_full_unstemmed Autoregressive transitional ordinal model to test for treatment effect in neurological trials with complex endpoints
title_short Autoregressive transitional ordinal model to test for treatment effect in neurological trials with complex endpoints
title_sort autoregressive transitional ordinal model to test for treatment effect in neurological trials with complex endpoints
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0251-y
work_keys_str_mv AT tanadinilorenzog autoregressivetransitionalordinalmodeltotestfortreatmenteffectinneurologicaltrialswithcomplexendpoints
AT steevesjohnd autoregressivetransitionalordinalmodeltotestfortreatmenteffectinneurologicaltrialswithcomplexendpoints
AT curtarmin autoregressivetransitionalordinalmodeltotestfortreatmenteffectinneurologicaltrialswithcomplexendpoints
AT hothorntorsten autoregressivetransitionalordinalmodeltotestfortreatmenteffectinneurologicaltrialswithcomplexendpoints