Cargando…
Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories
OBJECTIVE: To succinctly summarise five contemporary theories about motivation to learn, articulate key intersections and distinctions among these theories, and identify important considerations for future research. RESULTS: Motivation has been defined as the process whereby goal‐directed activities...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5113774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27628718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074 |
_version_ | 1782468242290245632 |
---|---|
author | Cook, David A Artino, Anthony R |
author_facet | Cook, David A Artino, Anthony R |
author_sort | Cook, David A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To succinctly summarise five contemporary theories about motivation to learn, articulate key intersections and distinctions among these theories, and identify important considerations for future research. RESULTS: Motivation has been defined as the process whereby goal‐directed activities are initiated and sustained. In expectancy‐value theory, motivation is a function of the expectation of success and perceived value. Attribution theory focuses on the causal attributions learners create to explain the results of an activity, and classifies these in terms of their locus, stability and controllability. Social‐ cognitive theory emphasises self‐efficacy as the primary driver of motivated action, and also identifies cues that influence future self‐efficacy and support self‐regulated learning. Goal orientation theory suggests that learners tend to engage in tasks with concerns about mastering the content (mastery goal, arising from a ‘growth’ mindset regarding intelligence and learning) or about doing better than others or avoiding failure (performance goals, arising from a ‘fixed’ mindset). Finally, self‐determination theory proposes that optimal performance results from actions motivated by intrinsic interests or by extrinsic values that have become integrated and internalised. Satisfying basic psychosocial needs of autonomy, competence and relatedness promotes such motivation. Looking across all five theories, we note recurrent themes of competence, value, attributions, and interactions between individuals and the learning context. CONCLUSIONS: To avoid conceptual confusion, and perhaps more importantly to maximise the theory‐building potential of their work, researchers must be careful (and precise) in how they define, operationalise and measure different motivational constructs. We suggest that motivation research continue to build theory and extend it to health professions domains, identify key outcomes and outcome measures, and test practical educational applications of the principles thus derived. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5113774 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51137742016-12-02 Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories Cook, David A Artino, Anthony R Med Educ The Cross‐cutting Edge OBJECTIVE: To succinctly summarise five contemporary theories about motivation to learn, articulate key intersections and distinctions among these theories, and identify important considerations for future research. RESULTS: Motivation has been defined as the process whereby goal‐directed activities are initiated and sustained. In expectancy‐value theory, motivation is a function of the expectation of success and perceived value. Attribution theory focuses on the causal attributions learners create to explain the results of an activity, and classifies these in terms of their locus, stability and controllability. Social‐ cognitive theory emphasises self‐efficacy as the primary driver of motivated action, and also identifies cues that influence future self‐efficacy and support self‐regulated learning. Goal orientation theory suggests that learners tend to engage in tasks with concerns about mastering the content (mastery goal, arising from a ‘growth’ mindset regarding intelligence and learning) or about doing better than others or avoiding failure (performance goals, arising from a ‘fixed’ mindset). Finally, self‐determination theory proposes that optimal performance results from actions motivated by intrinsic interests or by extrinsic values that have become integrated and internalised. Satisfying basic psychosocial needs of autonomy, competence and relatedness promotes such motivation. Looking across all five theories, we note recurrent themes of competence, value, attributions, and interactions between individuals and the learning context. CONCLUSIONS: To avoid conceptual confusion, and perhaps more importantly to maximise the theory‐building potential of their work, researchers must be careful (and precise) in how they define, operationalise and measure different motivational constructs. We suggest that motivation research continue to build theory and extend it to health professions domains, identify key outcomes and outcome measures, and test practical educational applications of the principles thus derived. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-15 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5113774/ /pubmed/27628718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Medical Education Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | The Cross‐cutting Edge Cook, David A Artino, Anthony R Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories |
title | Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories |
title_full | Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories |
title_fullStr | Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories |
title_full_unstemmed | Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories |
title_short | Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories |
title_sort | motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories |
topic | The Cross‐cutting Edge |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5113774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27628718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cookdavida motivationtolearnanoverviewofcontemporarytheories AT artinoanthonyr motivationtolearnanoverviewofcontemporarytheories |