Use of mandibular chin bone for alveolar bone grafting in cleft patients

BACKGROUND: We evaluated and compared the outcomes of different ossification processes in patients with alveolar cleft in whom correction was performed using endochondral bone graft or intramembranous bone graft. METHODS: The patients were divided into two groups: the endochondral bone (iliac bone o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Young-Wook, Lee, Jang-Ha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27995118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0091-z
_version_ 1782469610149249024
author Park, Young-Wook
Lee, Jang-Ha
author_facet Park, Young-Wook
Lee, Jang-Ha
author_sort Park, Young-Wook
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We evaluated and compared the outcomes of different ossification processes in patients with alveolar cleft in whom correction was performed using endochondral bone graft or intramembranous bone graft. METHODS: The patients were divided into two groups: the endochondral bone (iliac bone or rib bone) graft group and the intramembranous bone (mandibular bone) graft group. Medical records and radiologic images of patients who underwent alveolar bone grafting due to alveolar cleft were analyzed retrospectively. Through postoperative and follow-up radiologic images, the height of the interdental bone septum was classified into four types based on the highest point of alveolar ridge. Then, the height of the interdental bone septum and the area of the bone graft were evaluated according to the type of bone graft. In addition, the occurrence of complications and the need for an additional bone graft, the result of postoperative orthodontic treatment, and the eruption of impacted teeth were investigated. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included in this study. There was no significant difference in the change of the interdental bone height and the area of the bone graft according to the type of bone. There was no significant difference in the success rate of the surgery according to the type of bone. One patient underwent an additional bone graft surgery during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of alveolar bone grafting were not significantly different according to the type of bone graft. If appropriate to the size of the recipient site, the chin bone is a useful graft material in alveolar cleft, as is the iliac bone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5122602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51226022016-12-09 Use of mandibular chin bone for alveolar bone grafting in cleft patients Park, Young-Wook Lee, Jang-Ha Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Research BACKGROUND: We evaluated and compared the outcomes of different ossification processes in patients with alveolar cleft in whom correction was performed using endochondral bone graft or intramembranous bone graft. METHODS: The patients were divided into two groups: the endochondral bone (iliac bone or rib bone) graft group and the intramembranous bone (mandibular bone) graft group. Medical records and radiologic images of patients who underwent alveolar bone grafting due to alveolar cleft were analyzed retrospectively. Through postoperative and follow-up radiologic images, the height of the interdental bone septum was classified into four types based on the highest point of alveolar ridge. Then, the height of the interdental bone septum and the area of the bone graft were evaluated according to the type of bone graft. In addition, the occurrence of complications and the need for an additional bone graft, the result of postoperative orthodontic treatment, and the eruption of impacted teeth were investigated. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included in this study. There was no significant difference in the change of the interdental bone height and the area of the bone graft according to the type of bone. There was no significant difference in the success rate of the surgery according to the type of bone. One patient underwent an additional bone graft surgery during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of alveolar bone grafting were not significantly different according to the type of bone graft. If appropriate to the size of the recipient site, the chin bone is a useful graft material in alveolar cleft, as is the iliac bone. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5122602/ /pubmed/27995118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0091-z Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Park, Young-Wook
Lee, Jang-Ha
Use of mandibular chin bone for alveolar bone grafting in cleft patients
title Use of mandibular chin bone for alveolar bone grafting in cleft patients
title_full Use of mandibular chin bone for alveolar bone grafting in cleft patients
title_fullStr Use of mandibular chin bone for alveolar bone grafting in cleft patients
title_full_unstemmed Use of mandibular chin bone for alveolar bone grafting in cleft patients
title_short Use of mandibular chin bone for alveolar bone grafting in cleft patients
title_sort use of mandibular chin bone for alveolar bone grafting in cleft patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27995118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0091-z
work_keys_str_mv AT parkyoungwook useofmandibularchinboneforalveolarbonegraftingincleftpatients
AT leejangha useofmandibularchinboneforalveolarbonegraftingincleftpatients