Cargando…
Authorization of Animal Experiments Is Based on Confidence Rather than Evidence of Scientific Rigor
Accumulating evidence indicates high risk of bias in preclinical animal research, questioning the scientific validity and reproducibility of published research findings. Systematic reviews found low rates of reporting of measures against risks of bias in the published literature (e.g., randomization...
Autores principales: | Vogt, Lucile, Reichlin, Thomas S., Nathues, Christina, Würbel, Hanno |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5135031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27911892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000598 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Researchers’ View of Scientific Rigor—Survey on the Conduct and Reporting of In Vivo Research
por: Reichlin, Thomas S., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Reproducibility of preclinical animal research improves with heterogeneity of study samples
por: Voelkl, Bernhard, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Getting rigorous with scientific rigor
por: Hofseth, Lorne J
Publicado: (2018) -
Ayurveda, evidence-base and scientific rigor
por: Patwardhan, Bhushan
Publicado: (2010) -
Editorial: Scientific Rigor or Rigor Mortis?
por: Bernard, Christophe
Publicado: (2016)