Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Recently published randomized controlled trials have shown different results compared to the Fraction Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multi-vessel Evaluation (FAME) study. Therefore, this current analysis aimed to compare the adverse clinical outcomes associated with Fraction Flow Re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bundhun, Pravesh Kumar, Yanamala, Chandra Mouli, Huang, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5135818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27912739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0427-8

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5135818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27912739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0427-8

Ejemplares similares