Cargando…
Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Recently published randomized controlled trials have shown different results compared to the Fraction Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multi-vessel Evaluation (FAME) study. Therefore, this current analysis aimed to compare the adverse clinical outcomes associated with Fraction Flow Re...
Autores principales: | Bundhun, Pravesh Kumar, Yanamala, Chandra Mouli, Huang, Feng |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5135818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27912739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0427-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and the SYNTAX score: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Bundhun, Pravesh Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis
por: Zhang, Dongfeng, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Should a prolonged duration of dual anti-platelet therapy be recommended to patients with diabetes mellitus following percutaneous coronary intervention? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 studies
por: Bundhun, Pravesh Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
A real-world comparison of outcomes between fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Wong, Christopher C. Y., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Benefits of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
por: Shiono, Yasutsugu
Publicado: (2022)