Cargando…

Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate how different presentation formats influence comprehension and use of comparative performance information (CPI) among consumers. METHODS: An experimental between-subjects and within-subjects design with manipulations of CPI presentation formats. We enrolled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Damman, Olga C, De Jong, Anco, Hibbard, Judith H, Timmermans, Danielle R M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5136725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26543066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004120
_version_ 1782471770020773888
author Damman, Olga C
De Jong, Anco
Hibbard, Judith H
Timmermans, Danielle R M
author_facet Damman, Olga C
De Jong, Anco
Hibbard, Judith H
Timmermans, Danielle R M
author_sort Damman, Olga C
collection PubMed
description STUDY OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate how different presentation formats influence comprehension and use of comparative performance information (CPI) among consumers. METHODS: An experimental between-subjects and within-subjects design with manipulations of CPI presentation formats. We enrolled both consumers with lower socioeconomic status (SES)/cognitive skills and consumers with higher SES/cognitive skills, recruited through an online access panel. Respondents received fictitious CPI and completed questions about interpretation and information use. Between subjects, we tested (1) displaying an overall performance score (yes/no); (2) displaying a small number of quality indicators (5 vs 9); and (3) displaying different types of evaluative symbols (star ratings, coloured dots and word icons vs numbers and bar graphs). Within subjects, we tested the effect of a reduced number of healthcare providers (5 vs 20). Data were analysed using descriptive analysis, analyses of variance and paired-sampled t tests. RESULTS: A total of 902 (43%) respondents participated. Displaying an overall performance score and the use of coloured dots and word icons particularly enhanced consumer understanding. Importantly, respondents provided with coloured dots most often correctly selected the top three healthcare providers (84.3%), compared with word icons (76.6% correct), star ratings (70.6% correct), numbers (62.0%) and bars (54.2%) when viewing performance scores of 20 providers. Furthermore, a reduced number of healthcare providers appeared to support consumers, for example, when provided with 20 providers, 69.5% correctly selected the top three, compared with 80.2% with five providers. DISCUSSION: Particular presentation formats enhanced consumer understanding of CPI, most importantly the use of overall performance scores, word icons and coloured dots, and a reduced number of providers displayed. Public report efforts should use these formats to maximise impact on consumers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5136725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51367252016-12-08 Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding Damman, Olga C De Jong, Anco Hibbard, Judith H Timmermans, Danielle R M BMJ Qual Saf Original Research STUDY OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate how different presentation formats influence comprehension and use of comparative performance information (CPI) among consumers. METHODS: An experimental between-subjects and within-subjects design with manipulations of CPI presentation formats. We enrolled both consumers with lower socioeconomic status (SES)/cognitive skills and consumers with higher SES/cognitive skills, recruited through an online access panel. Respondents received fictitious CPI and completed questions about interpretation and information use. Between subjects, we tested (1) displaying an overall performance score (yes/no); (2) displaying a small number of quality indicators (5 vs 9); and (3) displaying different types of evaluative symbols (star ratings, coloured dots and word icons vs numbers and bar graphs). Within subjects, we tested the effect of a reduced number of healthcare providers (5 vs 20). Data were analysed using descriptive analysis, analyses of variance and paired-sampled t tests. RESULTS: A total of 902 (43%) respondents participated. Displaying an overall performance score and the use of coloured dots and word icons particularly enhanced consumer understanding. Importantly, respondents provided with coloured dots most often correctly selected the top three healthcare providers (84.3%), compared with word icons (76.6% correct), star ratings (70.6% correct), numbers (62.0%) and bars (54.2%) when viewing performance scores of 20 providers. Furthermore, a reduced number of healthcare providers appeared to support consumers, for example, when provided with 20 providers, 69.5% correctly selected the top three, compared with 80.2% with five providers. DISCUSSION: Particular presentation formats enhanced consumer understanding of CPI, most importantly the use of overall performance scores, word icons and coloured dots, and a reduced number of providers displayed. Public report efforts should use these formats to maximise impact on consumers. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-11 2015-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5136725/ /pubmed/26543066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004120 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Research
Damman, Olga C
De Jong, Anco
Hibbard, Judith H
Timmermans, Danielle R M
Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding
title Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding
title_full Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding
title_fullStr Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding
title_full_unstemmed Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding
title_short Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding
title_sort making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5136725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26543066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004120
work_keys_str_mv AT dammanolgac makingcomparativeperformanceinformationmorecomprehensibleanexperimentalevaluationoftheimpactofformatsonconsumerunderstanding
AT dejonganco makingcomparativeperformanceinformationmorecomprehensibleanexperimentalevaluationoftheimpactofformatsonconsumerunderstanding
AT hibbardjudithh makingcomparativeperformanceinformationmorecomprehensibleanexperimentalevaluationoftheimpactofformatsonconsumerunderstanding
AT timmermansdaniellerm makingcomparativeperformanceinformationmorecomprehensibleanexperimentalevaluationoftheimpactofformatsonconsumerunderstanding