Cargando…
Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding
STUDY OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate how different presentation formats influence comprehension and use of comparative performance information (CPI) among consumers. METHODS: An experimental between-subjects and within-subjects design with manipulations of CPI presentation formats. We enrolled...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5136725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26543066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004120 |
_version_ | 1782471770020773888 |
---|---|
author | Damman, Olga C De Jong, Anco Hibbard, Judith H Timmermans, Danielle R M |
author_facet | Damman, Olga C De Jong, Anco Hibbard, Judith H Timmermans, Danielle R M |
author_sort | Damman, Olga C |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate how different presentation formats influence comprehension and use of comparative performance information (CPI) among consumers. METHODS: An experimental between-subjects and within-subjects design with manipulations of CPI presentation formats. We enrolled both consumers with lower socioeconomic status (SES)/cognitive skills and consumers with higher SES/cognitive skills, recruited through an online access panel. Respondents received fictitious CPI and completed questions about interpretation and information use. Between subjects, we tested (1) displaying an overall performance score (yes/no); (2) displaying a small number of quality indicators (5 vs 9); and (3) displaying different types of evaluative symbols (star ratings, coloured dots and word icons vs numbers and bar graphs). Within subjects, we tested the effect of a reduced number of healthcare providers (5 vs 20). Data were analysed using descriptive analysis, analyses of variance and paired-sampled t tests. RESULTS: A total of 902 (43%) respondents participated. Displaying an overall performance score and the use of coloured dots and word icons particularly enhanced consumer understanding. Importantly, respondents provided with coloured dots most often correctly selected the top three healthcare providers (84.3%), compared with word icons (76.6% correct), star ratings (70.6% correct), numbers (62.0%) and bars (54.2%) when viewing performance scores of 20 providers. Furthermore, a reduced number of healthcare providers appeared to support consumers, for example, when provided with 20 providers, 69.5% correctly selected the top three, compared with 80.2% with five providers. DISCUSSION: Particular presentation formats enhanced consumer understanding of CPI, most importantly the use of overall performance scores, word icons and coloured dots, and a reduced number of providers displayed. Public report efforts should use these formats to maximise impact on consumers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5136725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51367252016-12-08 Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding Damman, Olga C De Jong, Anco Hibbard, Judith H Timmermans, Danielle R M BMJ Qual Saf Original Research STUDY OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate how different presentation formats influence comprehension and use of comparative performance information (CPI) among consumers. METHODS: An experimental between-subjects and within-subjects design with manipulations of CPI presentation formats. We enrolled both consumers with lower socioeconomic status (SES)/cognitive skills and consumers with higher SES/cognitive skills, recruited through an online access panel. Respondents received fictitious CPI and completed questions about interpretation and information use. Between subjects, we tested (1) displaying an overall performance score (yes/no); (2) displaying a small number of quality indicators (5 vs 9); and (3) displaying different types of evaluative symbols (star ratings, coloured dots and word icons vs numbers and bar graphs). Within subjects, we tested the effect of a reduced number of healthcare providers (5 vs 20). Data were analysed using descriptive analysis, analyses of variance and paired-sampled t tests. RESULTS: A total of 902 (43%) respondents participated. Displaying an overall performance score and the use of coloured dots and word icons particularly enhanced consumer understanding. Importantly, respondents provided with coloured dots most often correctly selected the top three healthcare providers (84.3%), compared with word icons (76.6% correct), star ratings (70.6% correct), numbers (62.0%) and bars (54.2%) when viewing performance scores of 20 providers. Furthermore, a reduced number of healthcare providers appeared to support consumers, for example, when provided with 20 providers, 69.5% correctly selected the top three, compared with 80.2% with five providers. DISCUSSION: Particular presentation formats enhanced consumer understanding of CPI, most importantly the use of overall performance scores, word icons and coloured dots, and a reduced number of providers displayed. Public report efforts should use these formats to maximise impact on consumers. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-11 2015-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5136725/ /pubmed/26543066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004120 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Research Damman, Olga C De Jong, Anco Hibbard, Judith H Timmermans, Danielle R M Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding |
title | Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding |
title_full | Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding |
title_fullStr | Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding |
title_full_unstemmed | Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding |
title_short | Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding |
title_sort | making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5136725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26543066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dammanolgac makingcomparativeperformanceinformationmorecomprehensibleanexperimentalevaluationoftheimpactofformatsonconsumerunderstanding AT dejonganco makingcomparativeperformanceinformationmorecomprehensibleanexperimentalevaluationoftheimpactofformatsonconsumerunderstanding AT hibbardjudithh makingcomparativeperformanceinformationmorecomprehensibleanexperimentalevaluationoftheimpactofformatsonconsumerunderstanding AT timmermansdaniellerm makingcomparativeperformanceinformationmorecomprehensibleanexperimentalevaluationoftheimpactofformatsonconsumerunderstanding |