Cargando…

Effects of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered deferiprone

AIMS: In light of the growing recognition of renal disease in thalassemia, it is important to understand the impact of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of iron chelators. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of the iron chelator deferiprone (DFP) in subjects with renal impair...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fradette, Caroline, Pichette, Vincent, Sicard, Éric, Stilman, Anne, Jayashankar, Shalini, Tsang, Yu Chung, Spino, Michael, Tricta, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5137824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27276421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13037
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: In light of the growing recognition of renal disease in thalassemia, it is important to understand the impact of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of iron chelators. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of the iron chelator deferiprone (DFP) in subjects with renal impairment in comparison with healthy volunteers (HVs). METHODS: Thirty‐two subjects were categorized into four groups based on degree of renal impairment: none, mild, moderate or severe, as determined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). All subjects received a single oral dose of 33 mg kg(−1) DFP, provided serum and urine samples for pharmacokinetic assessment over 24 h and were monitored for safety. RESULTS: Renal clearance of DFP decreased as renal impairment increased. However, based on C (max), AUC(0,t) and AUC(0,∞), there were no significant group differences in systemic exposure, because less than 4% of the drug was excreted unchanged in the urine. DFP is extensively metabolized to a renally excreted, pharmacologically inactive metabolite, deferiprone 3‐O‐glucuronide (DFP‐G), which exhibited higher C (max), AUC(0,t), AUC(0,∞) and longer t (max) and t (1/2) in the renally impaired groups compared with HVs. The C (max) and AUCs of DFP‐G increased as eGFR decreased. Overall, 75%–95% of the dose was retrieved in urine, either as DFP or DFP‐G, regardless of severity of renal impairment. With respect to safety, DFP was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that no adjustment of the DFP dosage regimen in patients with renal impairment is necessary, as there were no significant changes in the systemic exposure to the drug.