Cargando…

Identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow

Extensive cross-talk between signaling pathways is required to integrate the myriad of extracellular signal combinations at the cellular level. Gene duplication events may lead to the emergence of novel functions, leaving groups of similar genes - termed paralogs - in the genome. To distinguish crit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Modos, Dezso, Brooks, Johanne, Fazekas, David, Ari, Eszter, Vellai, Tibor, Csermely, Peter, Korcsmaros, Tamas, Lenti, Katalin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5138592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27922122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38588
_version_ 1782472091889565696
author Modos, Dezso
Brooks, Johanne
Fazekas, David
Ari, Eszter
Vellai, Tibor
Csermely, Peter
Korcsmaros, Tamas
Lenti, Katalin
author_facet Modos, Dezso
Brooks, Johanne
Fazekas, David
Ari, Eszter
Vellai, Tibor
Csermely, Peter
Korcsmaros, Tamas
Lenti, Katalin
author_sort Modos, Dezso
collection PubMed
description Extensive cross-talk between signaling pathways is required to integrate the myriad of extracellular signal combinations at the cellular level. Gene duplication events may lead to the emergence of novel functions, leaving groups of similar genes - termed paralogs - in the genome. To distinguish critical paralog groups (CPGs) from other paralogs in human signaling networks, we developed a signaling network-based method using cross-talk annotation and tissue-specific signaling flow analysis. 75 CPGs were found with higher degree, betweenness centrality, closeness, and ‘bowtieness’ when compared to other paralogs or other proteins in the signaling network. CPGs had higher diversity in all these measures, with more varied biological functions and more specific post-transcriptional regulation than non-critical paralog groups (non-CPG). Using TGF-beta, Notch and MAPK pathways as examples, SMAD2/3, NOTCH1/2/3 and MEK3/6-p38 CPGs were found to regulate the signaling flow of their respective pathways. Additionally, CPGs showed a higher mutation rate in both inherited diseases and cancer, and were enriched in drug targets. In conclusion, the results revealed two distinct types of paralog groups in the signaling network: CPGs and non-CPGs. Thus highlighting the importance of CPGs as compared to non-CPGs in drug discovery and disease pathogenesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5138592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51385922016-12-16 Identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow Modos, Dezso Brooks, Johanne Fazekas, David Ari, Eszter Vellai, Tibor Csermely, Peter Korcsmaros, Tamas Lenti, Katalin Sci Rep Article Extensive cross-talk between signaling pathways is required to integrate the myriad of extracellular signal combinations at the cellular level. Gene duplication events may lead to the emergence of novel functions, leaving groups of similar genes - termed paralogs - in the genome. To distinguish critical paralog groups (CPGs) from other paralogs in human signaling networks, we developed a signaling network-based method using cross-talk annotation and tissue-specific signaling flow analysis. 75 CPGs were found with higher degree, betweenness centrality, closeness, and ‘bowtieness’ when compared to other paralogs or other proteins in the signaling network. CPGs had higher diversity in all these measures, with more varied biological functions and more specific post-transcriptional regulation than non-critical paralog groups (non-CPG). Using TGF-beta, Notch and MAPK pathways as examples, SMAD2/3, NOTCH1/2/3 and MEK3/6-p38 CPGs were found to regulate the signaling flow of their respective pathways. Additionally, CPGs showed a higher mutation rate in both inherited diseases and cancer, and were enriched in drug targets. In conclusion, the results revealed two distinct types of paralog groups in the signaling network: CPGs and non-CPGs. Thus highlighting the importance of CPGs as compared to non-CPGs in drug discovery and disease pathogenesis. Nature Publishing Group 2016-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5138592/ /pubmed/27922122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38588 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Modos, Dezso
Brooks, Johanne
Fazekas, David
Ari, Eszter
Vellai, Tibor
Csermely, Peter
Korcsmaros, Tamas
Lenti, Katalin
Identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow
title Identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow
title_full Identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow
title_fullStr Identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow
title_full_unstemmed Identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow
title_short Identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow
title_sort identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5138592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27922122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38588
work_keys_str_mv AT modosdezso identificationofcriticalparaloggroupswithindispensablerolesintheregulationofsignalingflow
AT brooksjohanne identificationofcriticalparaloggroupswithindispensablerolesintheregulationofsignalingflow
AT fazekasdavid identificationofcriticalparaloggroupswithindispensablerolesintheregulationofsignalingflow
AT arieszter identificationofcriticalparaloggroupswithindispensablerolesintheregulationofsignalingflow
AT vellaitibor identificationofcriticalparaloggroupswithindispensablerolesintheregulationofsignalingflow
AT csermelypeter identificationofcriticalparaloggroupswithindispensablerolesintheregulationofsignalingflow
AT korcsmarostamas identificationofcriticalparaloggroupswithindispensablerolesintheregulationofsignalingflow
AT lentikatalin identificationofcriticalparaloggroupswithindispensablerolesintheregulationofsignalingflow