Cargando…
Identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow
Extensive cross-talk between signaling pathways is required to integrate the myriad of extracellular signal combinations at the cellular level. Gene duplication events may lead to the emergence of novel functions, leaving groups of similar genes - termed paralogs - in the genome. To distinguish crit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5138592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27922122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38588 |
_version_ | 1782472091889565696 |
---|---|
author | Modos, Dezso Brooks, Johanne Fazekas, David Ari, Eszter Vellai, Tibor Csermely, Peter Korcsmaros, Tamas Lenti, Katalin |
author_facet | Modos, Dezso Brooks, Johanne Fazekas, David Ari, Eszter Vellai, Tibor Csermely, Peter Korcsmaros, Tamas Lenti, Katalin |
author_sort | Modos, Dezso |
collection | PubMed |
description | Extensive cross-talk between signaling pathways is required to integrate the myriad of extracellular signal combinations at the cellular level. Gene duplication events may lead to the emergence of novel functions, leaving groups of similar genes - termed paralogs - in the genome. To distinguish critical paralog groups (CPGs) from other paralogs in human signaling networks, we developed a signaling network-based method using cross-talk annotation and tissue-specific signaling flow analysis. 75 CPGs were found with higher degree, betweenness centrality, closeness, and ‘bowtieness’ when compared to other paralogs or other proteins in the signaling network. CPGs had higher diversity in all these measures, with more varied biological functions and more specific post-transcriptional regulation than non-critical paralog groups (non-CPG). Using TGF-beta, Notch and MAPK pathways as examples, SMAD2/3, NOTCH1/2/3 and MEK3/6-p38 CPGs were found to regulate the signaling flow of their respective pathways. Additionally, CPGs showed a higher mutation rate in both inherited diseases and cancer, and were enriched in drug targets. In conclusion, the results revealed two distinct types of paralog groups in the signaling network: CPGs and non-CPGs. Thus highlighting the importance of CPGs as compared to non-CPGs in drug discovery and disease pathogenesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5138592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51385922016-12-16 Identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow Modos, Dezso Brooks, Johanne Fazekas, David Ari, Eszter Vellai, Tibor Csermely, Peter Korcsmaros, Tamas Lenti, Katalin Sci Rep Article Extensive cross-talk between signaling pathways is required to integrate the myriad of extracellular signal combinations at the cellular level. Gene duplication events may lead to the emergence of novel functions, leaving groups of similar genes - termed paralogs - in the genome. To distinguish critical paralog groups (CPGs) from other paralogs in human signaling networks, we developed a signaling network-based method using cross-talk annotation and tissue-specific signaling flow analysis. 75 CPGs were found with higher degree, betweenness centrality, closeness, and ‘bowtieness’ when compared to other paralogs or other proteins in the signaling network. CPGs had higher diversity in all these measures, with more varied biological functions and more specific post-transcriptional regulation than non-critical paralog groups (non-CPG). Using TGF-beta, Notch and MAPK pathways as examples, SMAD2/3, NOTCH1/2/3 and MEK3/6-p38 CPGs were found to regulate the signaling flow of their respective pathways. Additionally, CPGs showed a higher mutation rate in both inherited diseases and cancer, and were enriched in drug targets. In conclusion, the results revealed two distinct types of paralog groups in the signaling network: CPGs and non-CPGs. Thus highlighting the importance of CPGs as compared to non-CPGs in drug discovery and disease pathogenesis. Nature Publishing Group 2016-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5138592/ /pubmed/27922122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38588 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Modos, Dezso Brooks, Johanne Fazekas, David Ari, Eszter Vellai, Tibor Csermely, Peter Korcsmaros, Tamas Lenti, Katalin Identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow |
title | Identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow |
title_full | Identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow |
title_fullStr | Identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow |
title_full_unstemmed | Identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow |
title_short | Identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow |
title_sort | identification of critical paralog groups with indispensable roles in the regulation of signaling flow |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5138592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27922122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38588 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT modosdezso identificationofcriticalparaloggroupswithindispensablerolesintheregulationofsignalingflow AT brooksjohanne identificationofcriticalparaloggroupswithindispensablerolesintheregulationofsignalingflow AT fazekasdavid identificationofcriticalparaloggroupswithindispensablerolesintheregulationofsignalingflow AT arieszter identificationofcriticalparaloggroupswithindispensablerolesintheregulationofsignalingflow AT vellaitibor identificationofcriticalparaloggroupswithindispensablerolesintheregulationofsignalingflow AT csermelypeter identificationofcriticalparaloggroupswithindispensablerolesintheregulationofsignalingflow AT korcsmarostamas identificationofcriticalparaloggroupswithindispensablerolesintheregulationofsignalingflow AT lentikatalin identificationofcriticalparaloggroupswithindispensablerolesintheregulationofsignalingflow |