Cargando…

Learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial

BACKGROUND: Students in biomedical disciplines require understanding of normal and abnormal microscopic appearances of human tissues (histology and histopathology). For this purpose, practical classes in these disciplines typically use virtual microscopy, viewing digitised whole slide images in web...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahota, Michael, Leung, Betty, Dowdell, Stephanie, Velan, Gary M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27955651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0831-x
_version_ 1782474814964891648
author Sahota, Michael
Leung, Betty
Dowdell, Stephanie
Velan, Gary M.
author_facet Sahota, Michael
Leung, Betty
Dowdell, Stephanie
Velan, Gary M.
author_sort Sahota, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Students in biomedical disciplines require understanding of normal and abnormal microscopic appearances of human tissues (histology and histopathology). For this purpose, practical classes in these disciplines typically use virtual microscopy, viewing digitised whole slide images in web browsers. To enhance engagement, tools have been developed to enable individual or collaborative annotation of whole slide images within web browsers. To date, there have been no studies that have critically compared the impact on learning of individual and collaborative annotations on whole slide images. METHODS: Junior and senior students engaged in Pathology practical classes within Medical Science and Medicine programs participated in cross-over trials of individual and collaborative annotation activities. Students’ understanding of microscopic morphology was compared using timed online quizzes, while students’ perceptions of learning were evaluated using an online questionnaire. RESULTS: For senior medical students, collaborative annotation of whole slide images was superior for understanding key microscopic features when compared to individual annotation; whilst being at least equivalent to individual annotation for junior medical science students. Across cohorts, students agreed that the annotation activities provided a user-friendly learning environment that met their flexible learning needs, improved efficiency, provided useful feedback, and helped them to set learning priorities. Importantly, these activities were also perceived to enhance motivation and improve understanding. CONCLUSION: Collaborative annotation improves understanding of microscopic morphology for students with sufficient background understanding of the discipline. These findings have implications for the deployment of annotation activities in biomedical curricula, and potentially for postgraduate training in Anatomical Pathology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0831-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5154086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51540862016-12-20 Learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial Sahota, Michael Leung, Betty Dowdell, Stephanie Velan, Gary M. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Students in biomedical disciplines require understanding of normal and abnormal microscopic appearances of human tissues (histology and histopathology). For this purpose, practical classes in these disciplines typically use virtual microscopy, viewing digitised whole slide images in web browsers. To enhance engagement, tools have been developed to enable individual or collaborative annotation of whole slide images within web browsers. To date, there have been no studies that have critically compared the impact on learning of individual and collaborative annotations on whole slide images. METHODS: Junior and senior students engaged in Pathology practical classes within Medical Science and Medicine programs participated in cross-over trials of individual and collaborative annotation activities. Students’ understanding of microscopic morphology was compared using timed online quizzes, while students’ perceptions of learning were evaluated using an online questionnaire. RESULTS: For senior medical students, collaborative annotation of whole slide images was superior for understanding key microscopic features when compared to individual annotation; whilst being at least equivalent to individual annotation for junior medical science students. Across cohorts, students agreed that the annotation activities provided a user-friendly learning environment that met their flexible learning needs, improved efficiency, provided useful feedback, and helped them to set learning priorities. Importantly, these activities were also perceived to enhance motivation and improve understanding. CONCLUSION: Collaborative annotation improves understanding of microscopic morphology for students with sufficient background understanding of the discipline. These findings have implications for the deployment of annotation activities in biomedical curricula, and potentially for postgraduate training in Anatomical Pathology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0831-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5154086/ /pubmed/27955651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0831-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sahota, Michael
Leung, Betty
Dowdell, Stephanie
Velan, Gary M.
Learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial
title Learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial
title_full Learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial
title_fullStr Learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial
title_full_unstemmed Learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial
title_short Learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial
title_sort learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27955651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0831-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sahotamichael learningpathologyusingcollaborativevsindividualannotationofwholeslideimagesamixedmethodstrial
AT leungbetty learningpathologyusingcollaborativevsindividualannotationofwholeslideimagesamixedmethodstrial
AT dowdellstephanie learningpathologyusingcollaborativevsindividualannotationofwholeslideimagesamixedmethodstrial
AT velangarym learningpathologyusingcollaborativevsindividualannotationofwholeslideimagesamixedmethodstrial