Cargando…
Learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial
BACKGROUND: Students in biomedical disciplines require understanding of normal and abnormal microscopic appearances of human tissues (histology and histopathology). For this purpose, practical classes in these disciplines typically use virtual microscopy, viewing digitised whole slide images in web...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27955651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0831-x |
_version_ | 1782474814964891648 |
---|---|
author | Sahota, Michael Leung, Betty Dowdell, Stephanie Velan, Gary M. |
author_facet | Sahota, Michael Leung, Betty Dowdell, Stephanie Velan, Gary M. |
author_sort | Sahota, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Students in biomedical disciplines require understanding of normal and abnormal microscopic appearances of human tissues (histology and histopathology). For this purpose, practical classes in these disciplines typically use virtual microscopy, viewing digitised whole slide images in web browsers. To enhance engagement, tools have been developed to enable individual or collaborative annotation of whole slide images within web browsers. To date, there have been no studies that have critically compared the impact on learning of individual and collaborative annotations on whole slide images. METHODS: Junior and senior students engaged in Pathology practical classes within Medical Science and Medicine programs participated in cross-over trials of individual and collaborative annotation activities. Students’ understanding of microscopic morphology was compared using timed online quizzes, while students’ perceptions of learning were evaluated using an online questionnaire. RESULTS: For senior medical students, collaborative annotation of whole slide images was superior for understanding key microscopic features when compared to individual annotation; whilst being at least equivalent to individual annotation for junior medical science students. Across cohorts, students agreed that the annotation activities provided a user-friendly learning environment that met their flexible learning needs, improved efficiency, provided useful feedback, and helped them to set learning priorities. Importantly, these activities were also perceived to enhance motivation and improve understanding. CONCLUSION: Collaborative annotation improves understanding of microscopic morphology for students with sufficient background understanding of the discipline. These findings have implications for the deployment of annotation activities in biomedical curricula, and potentially for postgraduate training in Anatomical Pathology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0831-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5154086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51540862016-12-20 Learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial Sahota, Michael Leung, Betty Dowdell, Stephanie Velan, Gary M. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Students in biomedical disciplines require understanding of normal and abnormal microscopic appearances of human tissues (histology and histopathology). For this purpose, practical classes in these disciplines typically use virtual microscopy, viewing digitised whole slide images in web browsers. To enhance engagement, tools have been developed to enable individual or collaborative annotation of whole slide images within web browsers. To date, there have been no studies that have critically compared the impact on learning of individual and collaborative annotations on whole slide images. METHODS: Junior and senior students engaged in Pathology practical classes within Medical Science and Medicine programs participated in cross-over trials of individual and collaborative annotation activities. Students’ understanding of microscopic morphology was compared using timed online quizzes, while students’ perceptions of learning were evaluated using an online questionnaire. RESULTS: For senior medical students, collaborative annotation of whole slide images was superior for understanding key microscopic features when compared to individual annotation; whilst being at least equivalent to individual annotation for junior medical science students. Across cohorts, students agreed that the annotation activities provided a user-friendly learning environment that met their flexible learning needs, improved efficiency, provided useful feedback, and helped them to set learning priorities. Importantly, these activities were also perceived to enhance motivation and improve understanding. CONCLUSION: Collaborative annotation improves understanding of microscopic morphology for students with sufficient background understanding of the discipline. These findings have implications for the deployment of annotation activities in biomedical curricula, and potentially for postgraduate training in Anatomical Pathology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0831-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5154086/ /pubmed/27955651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0831-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sahota, Michael Leung, Betty Dowdell, Stephanie Velan, Gary M. Learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial |
title | Learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial |
title_full | Learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial |
title_fullStr | Learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial |
title_short | Learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial |
title_sort | learning pathology using collaborative vs. individual annotation of whole slide images: a mixed methods trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5154086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27955651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0831-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sahotamichael learningpathologyusingcollaborativevsindividualannotationofwholeslideimagesamixedmethodstrial AT leungbetty learningpathologyusingcollaborativevsindividualannotationofwholeslideimagesamixedmethodstrial AT dowdellstephanie learningpathologyusingcollaborativevsindividualannotationofwholeslideimagesamixedmethodstrial AT velangarym learningpathologyusingcollaborativevsindividualannotationofwholeslideimagesamixedmethodstrial |