Cargando…

Implicit Prosody and Cue-based Retrieval: L1 and L2 Agreement and Comprehension during Reading

This project focuses on structural and prosodic effects during reading, examining their influence on agreement processing and comprehension in native English (L1) and Spanish–English bilingual (L2) speakers. We consolidate research from several distinct areas of inquiry—cognitive processing, reading...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pratt, Elizabeth, Fernández, Eva M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5156782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28018264
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01922
_version_ 1782481322497802240
author Pratt, Elizabeth
Fernández, Eva M.
author_facet Pratt, Elizabeth
Fernández, Eva M.
author_sort Pratt, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description This project focuses on structural and prosodic effects during reading, examining their influence on agreement processing and comprehension in native English (L1) and Spanish–English bilingual (L2) speakers. We consolidate research from several distinct areas of inquiry—cognitive processing, reading fluency, and L1/L2 processing—in order to support the integration of prosody with a cue-based retrieval mechanism for subject-verb agreement. To explore this proposal, the experimental design manipulated text presentation to influence implicit prosody, using sentences designed to induce subject-verb agreement attraction errors. Materials included simple and complex relative clauses with head nouns and verbs that were either matched or mismatched for number. Participants read items in one of three presentation formats (whole sentence, word-by-word, or phrase-by-phrase), rated each item for grammaticality, and responded to a comprehension probe. Results indicated that while overall, message comprehension was prioritized over subject-verb agreement computation, presentation format differentially affected both measures in the L1 and L2 groups. For the L1 participants, facilitating the projection of phrasal prosody onto text (phrase-by-phrase presentation) enhanced performance in agreement processing, while disrupting prosodic projection via word-by-word presentation decreased comprehension accuracy. For the L2 participants, however, phrase-by-phrase presentation was not significantly beneficial for agreement processing, and additionally resulted in lower comprehension accuracy. These differences point to a significant role of prosodic phrasing during agreement processing in both L1 and L2 speakers, additionally suggesting that it may contribute to a cue-based retrieval agreement model, either acting as a cue directly, or otherwise scaffolding the retrieval process. The discussion and results presented provide support both for a cue-based retrieval mechanism in agreement, and the function of prosody within such a mechanism, adding further insight into the interaction of retrieval processes, cognitive task load, and the role of implicit prosody.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5156782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51567822016-12-23 Implicit Prosody and Cue-based Retrieval: L1 and L2 Agreement and Comprehension during Reading Pratt, Elizabeth Fernández, Eva M. Front Psychol Psychology This project focuses on structural and prosodic effects during reading, examining their influence on agreement processing and comprehension in native English (L1) and Spanish–English bilingual (L2) speakers. We consolidate research from several distinct areas of inquiry—cognitive processing, reading fluency, and L1/L2 processing—in order to support the integration of prosody with a cue-based retrieval mechanism for subject-verb agreement. To explore this proposal, the experimental design manipulated text presentation to influence implicit prosody, using sentences designed to induce subject-verb agreement attraction errors. Materials included simple and complex relative clauses with head nouns and verbs that were either matched or mismatched for number. Participants read items in one of three presentation formats (whole sentence, word-by-word, or phrase-by-phrase), rated each item for grammaticality, and responded to a comprehension probe. Results indicated that while overall, message comprehension was prioritized over subject-verb agreement computation, presentation format differentially affected both measures in the L1 and L2 groups. For the L1 participants, facilitating the projection of phrasal prosody onto text (phrase-by-phrase presentation) enhanced performance in agreement processing, while disrupting prosodic projection via word-by-word presentation decreased comprehension accuracy. For the L2 participants, however, phrase-by-phrase presentation was not significantly beneficial for agreement processing, and additionally resulted in lower comprehension accuracy. These differences point to a significant role of prosodic phrasing during agreement processing in both L1 and L2 speakers, additionally suggesting that it may contribute to a cue-based retrieval agreement model, either acting as a cue directly, or otherwise scaffolding the retrieval process. The discussion and results presented provide support both for a cue-based retrieval mechanism in agreement, and the function of prosody within such a mechanism, adding further insight into the interaction of retrieval processes, cognitive task load, and the role of implicit prosody. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5156782/ /pubmed/28018264 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01922 Text en Copyright © 2016 Pratt and Fernández. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Pratt, Elizabeth
Fernández, Eva M.
Implicit Prosody and Cue-based Retrieval: L1 and L2 Agreement and Comprehension during Reading
title Implicit Prosody and Cue-based Retrieval: L1 and L2 Agreement and Comprehension during Reading
title_full Implicit Prosody and Cue-based Retrieval: L1 and L2 Agreement and Comprehension during Reading
title_fullStr Implicit Prosody and Cue-based Retrieval: L1 and L2 Agreement and Comprehension during Reading
title_full_unstemmed Implicit Prosody and Cue-based Retrieval: L1 and L2 Agreement and Comprehension during Reading
title_short Implicit Prosody and Cue-based Retrieval: L1 and L2 Agreement and Comprehension during Reading
title_sort implicit prosody and cue-based retrieval: l1 and l2 agreement and comprehension during reading
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5156782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28018264
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01922
work_keys_str_mv AT prattelizabeth implicitprosodyandcuebasedretrievall1andl2agreementandcomprehensionduringreading
AT fernandezevam implicitprosodyandcuebasedretrievall1andl2agreementandcomprehensionduringreading