Cargando…

Comparison of a teratogenic transcriptome-based predictive test based on human embryonic versus inducible pluripotent stem cells

BACKGROUND: Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) partially recapitulate early embryonic three germ layer development, allowing testing of potential teratogenic hazards. Because use of hESCs is ethically debated, we investigated the potential for human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) to replace...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shinde, Vaibhav, Perumal Srinivasan, Sureshkumar, Henry, Margit, Rotshteyn, Tamara, Hescheler, Jürgen, Rahnenführer, Jörg, Grinberg, Marianna, Meisig, Johannes, Blüthgen, Nils, Waldmann, Tanja, Leist, Marcel, Hengstler, Jan Georg, Sachinidis, Agapios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5203708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28038682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-016-0449-2
_version_ 1782489774819377152
author Shinde, Vaibhav
Perumal Srinivasan, Sureshkumar
Henry, Margit
Rotshteyn, Tamara
Hescheler, Jürgen
Rahnenführer, Jörg
Grinberg, Marianna
Meisig, Johannes
Blüthgen, Nils
Waldmann, Tanja
Leist, Marcel
Hengstler, Jan Georg
Sachinidis, Agapios
author_facet Shinde, Vaibhav
Perumal Srinivasan, Sureshkumar
Henry, Margit
Rotshteyn, Tamara
Hescheler, Jürgen
Rahnenführer, Jörg
Grinberg, Marianna
Meisig, Johannes
Blüthgen, Nils
Waldmann, Tanja
Leist, Marcel
Hengstler, Jan Georg
Sachinidis, Agapios
author_sort Shinde, Vaibhav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) partially recapitulate early embryonic three germ layer development, allowing testing of potential teratogenic hazards. Because use of hESCs is ethically debated, we investigated the potential for human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) to replace hESCs in such tests. METHODS: Three cell lines, comprising hiPSCs (foreskin and IMR90) and hESCs (H9) were differentiated for 14 days. Their transcriptome profiles were obtained on day 0 and day 14 and analyzed by comprehensive bioinformatics tools. RESULTS: The transcriptomes on day 14 showed that more than 70% of the “developmental genes” (regulated genes with > 2-fold change on day 14 compared to day 0) exhibited variability among cell lines. The developmental genes belonging to all three cell lines captured biological processes and KEGG pathways related to all three germ layer embryonic development. In addition, transcriptome profiles were obtained after 14 days of exposure to teratogenic valproic acid (VPA) during differentiation. Although the differentially regulated genes between treated and untreated samples showed more than 90% variability among cell lines, VPA clearly antagonized the expression of developmental genes in all cell lines: suppressing upregulated developmental genes, while inducing downregulated ones. To quantify VPA-disturbed development based on developmental genes, we estimated the “developmental potency” (D (p)) and “developmental index” (D (i)). CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in genes deregulated by VPA, uniform D (i) values were obtained for all three cell lines. Given that the D (i) values for VPA were similar for hESCs and hiPSCs, D (i) can be used for robust hazard identification, irrespective of whether hESCs or hiPSCs are used in the test systems. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13287-016-0449-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5203708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52037082017-01-03 Comparison of a teratogenic transcriptome-based predictive test based on human embryonic versus inducible pluripotent stem cells Shinde, Vaibhav Perumal Srinivasan, Sureshkumar Henry, Margit Rotshteyn, Tamara Hescheler, Jürgen Rahnenführer, Jörg Grinberg, Marianna Meisig, Johannes Blüthgen, Nils Waldmann, Tanja Leist, Marcel Hengstler, Jan Georg Sachinidis, Agapios Stem Cell Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) partially recapitulate early embryonic three germ layer development, allowing testing of potential teratogenic hazards. Because use of hESCs is ethically debated, we investigated the potential for human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) to replace hESCs in such tests. METHODS: Three cell lines, comprising hiPSCs (foreskin and IMR90) and hESCs (H9) were differentiated for 14 days. Their transcriptome profiles were obtained on day 0 and day 14 and analyzed by comprehensive bioinformatics tools. RESULTS: The transcriptomes on day 14 showed that more than 70% of the “developmental genes” (regulated genes with > 2-fold change on day 14 compared to day 0) exhibited variability among cell lines. The developmental genes belonging to all three cell lines captured biological processes and KEGG pathways related to all three germ layer embryonic development. In addition, transcriptome profiles were obtained after 14 days of exposure to teratogenic valproic acid (VPA) during differentiation. Although the differentially regulated genes between treated and untreated samples showed more than 90% variability among cell lines, VPA clearly antagonized the expression of developmental genes in all cell lines: suppressing upregulated developmental genes, while inducing downregulated ones. To quantify VPA-disturbed development based on developmental genes, we estimated the “developmental potency” (D (p)) and “developmental index” (D (i)). CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in genes deregulated by VPA, uniform D (i) values were obtained for all three cell lines. Given that the D (i) values for VPA were similar for hESCs and hiPSCs, D (i) can be used for robust hazard identification, irrespective of whether hESCs or hiPSCs are used in the test systems. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13287-016-0449-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5203708/ /pubmed/28038682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-016-0449-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Shinde, Vaibhav
Perumal Srinivasan, Sureshkumar
Henry, Margit
Rotshteyn, Tamara
Hescheler, Jürgen
Rahnenführer, Jörg
Grinberg, Marianna
Meisig, Johannes
Blüthgen, Nils
Waldmann, Tanja
Leist, Marcel
Hengstler, Jan Georg
Sachinidis, Agapios
Comparison of a teratogenic transcriptome-based predictive test based on human embryonic versus inducible pluripotent stem cells
title Comparison of a teratogenic transcriptome-based predictive test based on human embryonic versus inducible pluripotent stem cells
title_full Comparison of a teratogenic transcriptome-based predictive test based on human embryonic versus inducible pluripotent stem cells
title_fullStr Comparison of a teratogenic transcriptome-based predictive test based on human embryonic versus inducible pluripotent stem cells
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a teratogenic transcriptome-based predictive test based on human embryonic versus inducible pluripotent stem cells
title_short Comparison of a teratogenic transcriptome-based predictive test based on human embryonic versus inducible pluripotent stem cells
title_sort comparison of a teratogenic transcriptome-based predictive test based on human embryonic versus inducible pluripotent stem cells
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5203708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28038682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-016-0449-2
work_keys_str_mv AT shindevaibhav comparisonofateratogenictranscriptomebasedpredictivetestbasedonhumanembryonicversusinduciblepluripotentstemcells
AT perumalsrinivasansureshkumar comparisonofateratogenictranscriptomebasedpredictivetestbasedonhumanembryonicversusinduciblepluripotentstemcells
AT henrymargit comparisonofateratogenictranscriptomebasedpredictivetestbasedonhumanembryonicversusinduciblepluripotentstemcells
AT rotshteyntamara comparisonofateratogenictranscriptomebasedpredictivetestbasedonhumanembryonicversusinduciblepluripotentstemcells
AT heschelerjurgen comparisonofateratogenictranscriptomebasedpredictivetestbasedonhumanembryonicversusinduciblepluripotentstemcells
AT rahnenfuhrerjorg comparisonofateratogenictranscriptomebasedpredictivetestbasedonhumanembryonicversusinduciblepluripotentstemcells
AT grinbergmarianna comparisonofateratogenictranscriptomebasedpredictivetestbasedonhumanembryonicversusinduciblepluripotentstemcells
AT meisigjohannes comparisonofateratogenictranscriptomebasedpredictivetestbasedonhumanembryonicversusinduciblepluripotentstemcells
AT bluthgennils comparisonofateratogenictranscriptomebasedpredictivetestbasedonhumanembryonicversusinduciblepluripotentstemcells
AT waldmanntanja comparisonofateratogenictranscriptomebasedpredictivetestbasedonhumanembryonicversusinduciblepluripotentstemcells
AT leistmarcel comparisonofateratogenictranscriptomebasedpredictivetestbasedonhumanembryonicversusinduciblepluripotentstemcells
AT hengstlerjangeorg comparisonofateratogenictranscriptomebasedpredictivetestbasedonhumanembryonicversusinduciblepluripotentstemcells
AT sachinidisagapios comparisonofateratogenictranscriptomebasedpredictivetestbasedonhumanembryonicversusinduciblepluripotentstemcells