Cargando…

sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio test for pre‐eclampsia: an economic assessment for the UK

OBJECTIVES: To assess the economic impact of introducing into clinical practice in the UK the soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase (sFlt‐1) to placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio test for guiding the management of pre‐eclampsia. METHODS: We used an economic model estimating the incremental value of inf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vatish, M., Strunz‐McKendry, T., Hund, M., Allegranza, D., Wolf, C., Smare, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27300726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.15997
_version_ 1782491804040429568
author Vatish, M.
Strunz‐McKendry, T.
Hund, M.
Allegranza, D.
Wolf, C.
Smare, C.
author_facet Vatish, M.
Strunz‐McKendry, T.
Hund, M.
Allegranza, D.
Wolf, C.
Smare, C.
author_sort Vatish, M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the economic impact of introducing into clinical practice in the UK the soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase (sFlt‐1) to placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio test for guiding the management of pre‐eclampsia. METHODS: We used an economic model estimating the incremental value of information, from a UK National Health Service payer's perspective, generated by the sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio test, compared with current diagnostic procedures, in guiding the management of women with suspected pre‐eclampsia. The economic model estimated costs associated with the diagnosis and management of pre‐eclampsia in pregnant women between 24 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks' gestation, managed in either a ‘test’ scenario in which the sFlt‐1/PlGF test is used in addition to current diagnostic procedures, or a ‘no‐test’ scenario in which clinical decisions are based on current diagnostic procedures alone. Test characteristics and resource use were derived from PROGNOSIS, a non‐interventional study in women presenting with clinical suspicion of pre‐eclampsia. The main outcome measure from the economic model was the cost per patient per episode of care, from first suspicion of pre‐eclampsia to birth. RESULTS: Introduction of the sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio test into clinical practice is expected to result in cost savings of £344 per patient compared with a no‐test scenario. Savings are generated primarily through an improvement in diagnostic accuracy and subsequent reduction in unnecessary hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Introducing the sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio test into clinical practice in the UK was shown to be cost‐saving by reducing unnecessary hospitalization of women at low risk of developing pre‐eclampsia. In addition, the test ensures that those women at higher risk are identified and managed appropriately. © 2016 Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5215695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52156952017-01-18 sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio test for pre‐eclampsia: an economic assessment for the UK Vatish, M. Strunz‐McKendry, T. Hund, M. Allegranza, D. Wolf, C. Smare, C. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Original Papers OBJECTIVES: To assess the economic impact of introducing into clinical practice in the UK the soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase (sFlt‐1) to placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio test for guiding the management of pre‐eclampsia. METHODS: We used an economic model estimating the incremental value of information, from a UK National Health Service payer's perspective, generated by the sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio test, compared with current diagnostic procedures, in guiding the management of women with suspected pre‐eclampsia. The economic model estimated costs associated with the diagnosis and management of pre‐eclampsia in pregnant women between 24 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks' gestation, managed in either a ‘test’ scenario in which the sFlt‐1/PlGF test is used in addition to current diagnostic procedures, or a ‘no‐test’ scenario in which clinical decisions are based on current diagnostic procedures alone. Test characteristics and resource use were derived from PROGNOSIS, a non‐interventional study in women presenting with clinical suspicion of pre‐eclampsia. The main outcome measure from the economic model was the cost per patient per episode of care, from first suspicion of pre‐eclampsia to birth. RESULTS: Introduction of the sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio test into clinical practice is expected to result in cost savings of £344 per patient compared with a no‐test scenario. Savings are generated primarily through an improvement in diagnostic accuracy and subsequent reduction in unnecessary hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Introducing the sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio test into clinical practice in the UK was shown to be cost‐saving by reducing unnecessary hospitalization of women at low risk of developing pre‐eclampsia. In addition, the test ensures that those women at higher risk are identified and managed appropriately. © 2016 Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2016-11-08 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5215695/ /pubmed/27300726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.15997 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Vatish, M.
Strunz‐McKendry, T.
Hund, M.
Allegranza, D.
Wolf, C.
Smare, C.
sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio test for pre‐eclampsia: an economic assessment for the UK
title sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio test for pre‐eclampsia: an economic assessment for the UK
title_full sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio test for pre‐eclampsia: an economic assessment for the UK
title_fullStr sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio test for pre‐eclampsia: an economic assessment for the UK
title_full_unstemmed sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio test for pre‐eclampsia: an economic assessment for the UK
title_short sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio test for pre‐eclampsia: an economic assessment for the UK
title_sort sflt‐1/plgf ratio test for pre‐eclampsia: an economic assessment for the uk
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27300726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.15997
work_keys_str_mv AT vatishm sflt1plgfratiotestforpreeclampsiaaneconomicassessmentfortheuk
AT strunzmckendryt sflt1plgfratiotestforpreeclampsiaaneconomicassessmentfortheuk
AT hundm sflt1plgfratiotestforpreeclampsiaaneconomicassessmentfortheuk
AT allegranzad sflt1plgfratiotestforpreeclampsiaaneconomicassessmentfortheuk
AT wolfc sflt1plgfratiotestforpreeclampsiaaneconomicassessmentfortheuk
AT smarec sflt1plgfratiotestforpreeclampsiaaneconomicassessmentfortheuk