Cargando…

Strengths and weaknesses of EST-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing

BACKGROUND: Alternative splicing contributes significantly to the complexity of the human transcriptome and proteome. Computational prediction of alternative splice isoforms are usually based on EST sequences that also allow to approximate the expression pattern of the related transcripts. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Shobhit, Zink, Dorothea, Korn, Bernhard, Vingron, Martin, Haas, Stefan A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC521684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15453915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-5-72
_version_ 1782121843742736384
author Gupta, Shobhit
Zink, Dorothea
Korn, Bernhard
Vingron, Martin
Haas, Stefan A
author_facet Gupta, Shobhit
Zink, Dorothea
Korn, Bernhard
Vingron, Martin
Haas, Stefan A
author_sort Gupta, Shobhit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Alternative splicing contributes significantly to the complexity of the human transcriptome and proteome. Computational prediction of alternative splice isoforms are usually based on EST sequences that also allow to approximate the expression pattern of the related transcripts. However, the limited number of tissues represented in the EST data as well as the different cDNA construction protocols may influence the predictive capacity of ESTs to unravel tissue-specifically expressed transcripts. METHODS: We predict tissue and tumor specific splice isoforms based on the genomic mapping (SpliceNest) of the EST consensus sequences and library annotation provided in the GeneNest database. We further ascertain the potentially rare tissue specific transcripts as the ones represented only by ESTs derived from normalized libraries. A subset of the predicted tissue and tumor specific isoforms are then validated via RT-PCR experiments over a spectrum of 40 tissue types. RESULTS: Our strategy revealed 427 genes with at least one tissue specific transcript as well as 1120 genes showing tumor specific isoforms. While our experimental evaluation of computationally predicted tissue-specific isoforms revealed a high success rate in confirming the expression of these isoforms in the respective tissue, the strategy frequently failed to detect the expected restricted expression pattern. The analysis of putative lowly expressed transcripts using normalized cDNA libraries suggests that our ability to detect tissue-specific isoforms strongly depends on the expression level of the respective transcript as well as on the sensitivity of the experimental methods. Especially splice isoforms predicted to be disease-specific tend to represent transcripts that are expressed in a set of healthy tissues rather than novel isoforms. CONCLUSIONS: We propose to combine the computational prediction of alternative splice isoforms with experimental validation for efficient delineation of an accurate set of tissue-specific transcripts.
format Text
id pubmed-521684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-5216842004-10-12 Strengths and weaknesses of EST-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing Gupta, Shobhit Zink, Dorothea Korn, Bernhard Vingron, Martin Haas, Stefan A BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Alternative splicing contributes significantly to the complexity of the human transcriptome and proteome. Computational prediction of alternative splice isoforms are usually based on EST sequences that also allow to approximate the expression pattern of the related transcripts. However, the limited number of tissues represented in the EST data as well as the different cDNA construction protocols may influence the predictive capacity of ESTs to unravel tissue-specifically expressed transcripts. METHODS: We predict tissue and tumor specific splice isoforms based on the genomic mapping (SpliceNest) of the EST consensus sequences and library annotation provided in the GeneNest database. We further ascertain the potentially rare tissue specific transcripts as the ones represented only by ESTs derived from normalized libraries. A subset of the predicted tissue and tumor specific isoforms are then validated via RT-PCR experiments over a spectrum of 40 tissue types. RESULTS: Our strategy revealed 427 genes with at least one tissue specific transcript as well as 1120 genes showing tumor specific isoforms. While our experimental evaluation of computationally predicted tissue-specific isoforms revealed a high success rate in confirming the expression of these isoforms in the respective tissue, the strategy frequently failed to detect the expected restricted expression pattern. The analysis of putative lowly expressed transcripts using normalized cDNA libraries suggests that our ability to detect tissue-specific isoforms strongly depends on the expression level of the respective transcript as well as on the sensitivity of the experimental methods. Especially splice isoforms predicted to be disease-specific tend to represent transcripts that are expressed in a set of healthy tissues rather than novel isoforms. CONCLUSIONS: We propose to combine the computational prediction of alternative splice isoforms with experimental validation for efficient delineation of an accurate set of tissue-specific transcripts. BioMed Central 2004-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC521684/ /pubmed/15453915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-5-72 Text en Copyright © 2004 Gupta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Gupta, Shobhit
Zink, Dorothea
Korn, Bernhard
Vingron, Martin
Haas, Stefan A
Strengths and weaknesses of EST-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing
title Strengths and weaknesses of EST-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing
title_full Strengths and weaknesses of EST-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing
title_fullStr Strengths and weaknesses of EST-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing
title_full_unstemmed Strengths and weaknesses of EST-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing
title_short Strengths and weaknesses of EST-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing
title_sort strengths and weaknesses of est-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC521684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15453915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-5-72
work_keys_str_mv AT guptashobhit strengthsandweaknessesofestbasedpredictionoftissuespecificalternativesplicing
AT zinkdorothea strengthsandweaknessesofestbasedpredictionoftissuespecificalternativesplicing
AT kornbernhard strengthsandweaknessesofestbasedpredictionoftissuespecificalternativesplicing
AT vingronmartin strengthsandweaknessesofestbasedpredictionoftissuespecificalternativesplicing
AT haasstefana strengthsandweaknessesofestbasedpredictionoftissuespecificalternativesplicing