Cargando…
Strengths and weaknesses of EST-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing
BACKGROUND: Alternative splicing contributes significantly to the complexity of the human transcriptome and proteome. Computational prediction of alternative splice isoforms are usually based on EST sequences that also allow to approximate the expression pattern of the related transcripts. However,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC521684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15453915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-5-72 |
_version_ | 1782121843742736384 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Shobhit Zink, Dorothea Korn, Bernhard Vingron, Martin Haas, Stefan A |
author_facet | Gupta, Shobhit Zink, Dorothea Korn, Bernhard Vingron, Martin Haas, Stefan A |
author_sort | Gupta, Shobhit |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Alternative splicing contributes significantly to the complexity of the human transcriptome and proteome. Computational prediction of alternative splice isoforms are usually based on EST sequences that also allow to approximate the expression pattern of the related transcripts. However, the limited number of tissues represented in the EST data as well as the different cDNA construction protocols may influence the predictive capacity of ESTs to unravel tissue-specifically expressed transcripts. METHODS: We predict tissue and tumor specific splice isoforms based on the genomic mapping (SpliceNest) of the EST consensus sequences and library annotation provided in the GeneNest database. We further ascertain the potentially rare tissue specific transcripts as the ones represented only by ESTs derived from normalized libraries. A subset of the predicted tissue and tumor specific isoforms are then validated via RT-PCR experiments over a spectrum of 40 tissue types. RESULTS: Our strategy revealed 427 genes with at least one tissue specific transcript as well as 1120 genes showing tumor specific isoforms. While our experimental evaluation of computationally predicted tissue-specific isoforms revealed a high success rate in confirming the expression of these isoforms in the respective tissue, the strategy frequently failed to detect the expected restricted expression pattern. The analysis of putative lowly expressed transcripts using normalized cDNA libraries suggests that our ability to detect tissue-specific isoforms strongly depends on the expression level of the respective transcript as well as on the sensitivity of the experimental methods. Especially splice isoforms predicted to be disease-specific tend to represent transcripts that are expressed in a set of healthy tissues rather than novel isoforms. CONCLUSIONS: We propose to combine the computational prediction of alternative splice isoforms with experimental validation for efficient delineation of an accurate set of tissue-specific transcripts. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-521684 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-5216842004-10-12 Strengths and weaknesses of EST-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing Gupta, Shobhit Zink, Dorothea Korn, Bernhard Vingron, Martin Haas, Stefan A BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Alternative splicing contributes significantly to the complexity of the human transcriptome and proteome. Computational prediction of alternative splice isoforms are usually based on EST sequences that also allow to approximate the expression pattern of the related transcripts. However, the limited number of tissues represented in the EST data as well as the different cDNA construction protocols may influence the predictive capacity of ESTs to unravel tissue-specifically expressed transcripts. METHODS: We predict tissue and tumor specific splice isoforms based on the genomic mapping (SpliceNest) of the EST consensus sequences and library annotation provided in the GeneNest database. We further ascertain the potentially rare tissue specific transcripts as the ones represented only by ESTs derived from normalized libraries. A subset of the predicted tissue and tumor specific isoforms are then validated via RT-PCR experiments over a spectrum of 40 tissue types. RESULTS: Our strategy revealed 427 genes with at least one tissue specific transcript as well as 1120 genes showing tumor specific isoforms. While our experimental evaluation of computationally predicted tissue-specific isoforms revealed a high success rate in confirming the expression of these isoforms in the respective tissue, the strategy frequently failed to detect the expected restricted expression pattern. The analysis of putative lowly expressed transcripts using normalized cDNA libraries suggests that our ability to detect tissue-specific isoforms strongly depends on the expression level of the respective transcript as well as on the sensitivity of the experimental methods. Especially splice isoforms predicted to be disease-specific tend to represent transcripts that are expressed in a set of healthy tissues rather than novel isoforms. CONCLUSIONS: We propose to combine the computational prediction of alternative splice isoforms with experimental validation for efficient delineation of an accurate set of tissue-specific transcripts. BioMed Central 2004-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC521684/ /pubmed/15453915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-5-72 Text en Copyright © 2004 Gupta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Gupta, Shobhit Zink, Dorothea Korn, Bernhard Vingron, Martin Haas, Stefan A Strengths and weaknesses of EST-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing |
title | Strengths and weaknesses of EST-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing |
title_full | Strengths and weaknesses of EST-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing |
title_fullStr | Strengths and weaknesses of EST-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing |
title_full_unstemmed | Strengths and weaknesses of EST-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing |
title_short | Strengths and weaknesses of EST-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing |
title_sort | strengths and weaknesses of est-based prediction of tissue-specific alternative splicing |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC521684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15453915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-5-72 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptashobhit strengthsandweaknessesofestbasedpredictionoftissuespecificalternativesplicing AT zinkdorothea strengthsandweaknessesofestbasedpredictionoftissuespecificalternativesplicing AT kornbernhard strengthsandweaknessesofestbasedpredictionoftissuespecificalternativesplicing AT vingronmartin strengthsandweaknessesofestbasedpredictionoftissuespecificalternativesplicing AT haasstefana strengthsandweaknessesofestbasedpredictionoftissuespecificalternativesplicing |