Cargando…

Using Next-Generation Sequencing for DNA Barcoding: Capturing Allelic Variation in ITS2

Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2) is a popular DNA barcoding marker; however, in some animal species it is hypervariable and therefore difficult to sequence with traditional methods. With next-generation sequencing (NGS) it is possible to sequence all gene variants despite the presence of single...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batovska, Jana, Cogan, Noel O. I., Lynch, Stacey E., Blacket, Mark J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Genetics Society of America 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.036145
_version_ 1782492046208008192
author Batovska, Jana
Cogan, Noel O. I.
Lynch, Stacey E.
Blacket, Mark J.
author_facet Batovska, Jana
Cogan, Noel O. I.
Lynch, Stacey E.
Blacket, Mark J.
author_sort Batovska, Jana
collection PubMed
description Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2) is a popular DNA barcoding marker; however, in some animal species it is hypervariable and therefore difficult to sequence with traditional methods. With next-generation sequencing (NGS) it is possible to sequence all gene variants despite the presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions/deletions (indels), homopolymeric regions, and microsatellites. Our aim was to compare the performance of Sanger sequencing and NGS amplicon sequencing in characterizing ITS2 in 26 mosquito species represented by 88 samples. The suitability of ITS2 as a DNA barcoding marker for mosquitoes, and its allelic diversity in individuals and species, was also assessed. Compared to Sanger sequencing, NGS was able to characterize the ITS2 region to a greater extent, with resolution within and between individuals and species that was previously not possible. A total of 382 unique sequences (alleles) were generated from the 88 mosquito specimens, demonstrating the diversity present that has been overlooked by traditional sequencing methods. Multiple indels and microsatellites were present in the ITS2 alleles, which were often specific to species or genera, causing variation in sequence length. As a barcoding marker, ITS2 was able to separate all of the species, apart from members of the Culex pipiens complex, providing the same resolution as the commonly used Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI). The ability to cost-effectively sequence hypervariable markers makes NGS an invaluable tool with many applications in the DNA barcoding field, and provides insights into the limitations of previous studies and techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5217108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Genetics Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52171082017-01-09 Using Next-Generation Sequencing for DNA Barcoding: Capturing Allelic Variation in ITS2 Batovska, Jana Cogan, Noel O. I. Lynch, Stacey E. Blacket, Mark J. G3 (Bethesda) Investigations Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2) is a popular DNA barcoding marker; however, in some animal species it is hypervariable and therefore difficult to sequence with traditional methods. With next-generation sequencing (NGS) it is possible to sequence all gene variants despite the presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions/deletions (indels), homopolymeric regions, and microsatellites. Our aim was to compare the performance of Sanger sequencing and NGS amplicon sequencing in characterizing ITS2 in 26 mosquito species represented by 88 samples. The suitability of ITS2 as a DNA barcoding marker for mosquitoes, and its allelic diversity in individuals and species, was also assessed. Compared to Sanger sequencing, NGS was able to characterize the ITS2 region to a greater extent, with resolution within and between individuals and species that was previously not possible. A total of 382 unique sequences (alleles) were generated from the 88 mosquito specimens, demonstrating the diversity present that has been overlooked by traditional sequencing methods. Multiple indels and microsatellites were present in the ITS2 alleles, which were often specific to species or genera, causing variation in sequence length. As a barcoding marker, ITS2 was able to separate all of the species, apart from members of the Culex pipiens complex, providing the same resolution as the commonly used Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI). The ability to cost-effectively sequence hypervariable markers makes NGS an invaluable tool with many applications in the DNA barcoding field, and provides insights into the limitations of previous studies and techniques. Genetics Society of America 2016-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5217108/ /pubmed/27799340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.036145 Text en Copyright © 2017 Batovska et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Investigations
Batovska, Jana
Cogan, Noel O. I.
Lynch, Stacey E.
Blacket, Mark J.
Using Next-Generation Sequencing for DNA Barcoding: Capturing Allelic Variation in ITS2
title Using Next-Generation Sequencing for DNA Barcoding: Capturing Allelic Variation in ITS2
title_full Using Next-Generation Sequencing for DNA Barcoding: Capturing Allelic Variation in ITS2
title_fullStr Using Next-Generation Sequencing for DNA Barcoding: Capturing Allelic Variation in ITS2
title_full_unstemmed Using Next-Generation Sequencing for DNA Barcoding: Capturing Allelic Variation in ITS2
title_short Using Next-Generation Sequencing for DNA Barcoding: Capturing Allelic Variation in ITS2
title_sort using next-generation sequencing for dna barcoding: capturing allelic variation in its2
topic Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.036145
work_keys_str_mv AT batovskajana usingnextgenerationsequencingfordnabarcodingcapturingallelicvariationinits2
AT cogannoeloi usingnextgenerationsequencingfordnabarcodingcapturingallelicvariationinits2
AT lynchstaceye usingnextgenerationsequencingfordnabarcodingcapturingallelicvariationinits2
AT blacketmarkj usingnextgenerationsequencingfordnabarcodingcapturingallelicvariationinits2