Cargando…
Who to Interview? Low Adherence by U.S. Medical Schools to Medical Student Performance Evaluation Format Makes Resident Selection Difficult
INTRODUCTION: The Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) appendices provide a program director with comparative performance for a student’s academic and professional attributes, but they are frequently absent or incomplete. METHODS: We reviewed MSPEs from applicants to our emergency medicine...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5226763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28116008 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.10.32233 |
_version_ | 1782493707945115648 |
---|---|
author | Boysen-Osborn, Megan Yanuck, Justin Mattson, James Toohey, Shannon Wray, Alisa Wiechmann, Warren Lahham, Shadi Langdorf, Mark I. |
author_facet | Boysen-Osborn, Megan Yanuck, Justin Mattson, James Toohey, Shannon Wray, Alisa Wiechmann, Warren Lahham, Shadi Langdorf, Mark I. |
author_sort | Boysen-Osborn, Megan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) appendices provide a program director with comparative performance for a student’s academic and professional attributes, but they are frequently absent or incomplete. METHODS: We reviewed MSPEs from applicants to our emergency medicine residency program from 134 of 136 (99%) U.S. allopathic medical schools, over two application cycles (2012–13, 2014–15). We determined the degree of compliance with each of the five recommended MSPE appendices. RESULTS: Only three (2%) medical schools were compliant with all five appendices. The medical school information page (MSIP, appendix E) was present most commonly (85%), followed by comparative clerkship performance (appendix B, 82%), overall performance (appendix D, 59%), preclinical performance (appendix A, 57%), and professional attributes (appendix C, 18%). Few schools (7%) provided student-specific, comparative professionalism assessments. CONCLUSION: Medical schools inconsistently provide graphic, comparative data for their students in the MSPE. Although program directors (PD) value evidence of an applicant’s professionalism when selecting residents, medical schools rarely provide such useful, comparative professionalism data in their MSPEs. As PDs seek to evaluate applicants based on academic performance and professionalism, rather than standardized testing alone, medical schools must make MSPEs more consistent, objective, and comparative. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5226763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52267632017-01-23 Who to Interview? Low Adherence by U.S. Medical Schools to Medical Student Performance Evaluation Format Makes Resident Selection Difficult Boysen-Osborn, Megan Yanuck, Justin Mattson, James Toohey, Shannon Wray, Alisa Wiechmann, Warren Lahham, Shadi Langdorf, Mark I. West J Emerg Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: The Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) appendices provide a program director with comparative performance for a student’s academic and professional attributes, but they are frequently absent or incomplete. METHODS: We reviewed MSPEs from applicants to our emergency medicine residency program from 134 of 136 (99%) U.S. allopathic medical schools, over two application cycles (2012–13, 2014–15). We determined the degree of compliance with each of the five recommended MSPE appendices. RESULTS: Only three (2%) medical schools were compliant with all five appendices. The medical school information page (MSIP, appendix E) was present most commonly (85%), followed by comparative clerkship performance (appendix B, 82%), overall performance (appendix D, 59%), preclinical performance (appendix A, 57%), and professional attributes (appendix C, 18%). Few schools (7%) provided student-specific, comparative professionalism assessments. CONCLUSION: Medical schools inconsistently provide graphic, comparative data for their students in the MSPE. Although program directors (PD) value evidence of an applicant’s professionalism when selecting residents, medical schools rarely provide such useful, comparative professionalism data in their MSPEs. As PDs seek to evaluate applicants based on academic performance and professionalism, rather than standardized testing alone, medical schools must make MSPEs more consistent, objective, and comparative. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2017-01 2016-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5226763/ /pubmed/28116008 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.10.32233 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Boysen-Osborn et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Research Boysen-Osborn, Megan Yanuck, Justin Mattson, James Toohey, Shannon Wray, Alisa Wiechmann, Warren Lahham, Shadi Langdorf, Mark I. Who to Interview? Low Adherence by U.S. Medical Schools to Medical Student Performance Evaluation Format Makes Resident Selection Difficult |
title | Who to Interview? Low Adherence by U.S. Medical Schools to Medical Student Performance Evaluation Format Makes Resident Selection Difficult |
title_full | Who to Interview? Low Adherence by U.S. Medical Schools to Medical Student Performance Evaluation Format Makes Resident Selection Difficult |
title_fullStr | Who to Interview? Low Adherence by U.S. Medical Schools to Medical Student Performance Evaluation Format Makes Resident Selection Difficult |
title_full_unstemmed | Who to Interview? Low Adherence by U.S. Medical Schools to Medical Student Performance Evaluation Format Makes Resident Selection Difficult |
title_short | Who to Interview? Low Adherence by U.S. Medical Schools to Medical Student Performance Evaluation Format Makes Resident Selection Difficult |
title_sort | who to interview? low adherence by u.s. medical schools to medical student performance evaluation format makes resident selection difficult |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5226763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28116008 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.10.32233 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boysenosbornmegan whotointerviewlowadherencebyusmedicalschoolstomedicalstudentperformanceevaluationformatmakesresidentselectiondifficult AT yanuckjustin whotointerviewlowadherencebyusmedicalschoolstomedicalstudentperformanceevaluationformatmakesresidentselectiondifficult AT mattsonjames whotointerviewlowadherencebyusmedicalschoolstomedicalstudentperformanceevaluationformatmakesresidentselectiondifficult AT tooheyshannon whotointerviewlowadherencebyusmedicalschoolstomedicalstudentperformanceevaluationformatmakesresidentselectiondifficult AT wrayalisa whotointerviewlowadherencebyusmedicalschoolstomedicalstudentperformanceevaluationformatmakesresidentselectiondifficult AT wiechmannwarren whotointerviewlowadherencebyusmedicalschoolstomedicalstudentperformanceevaluationformatmakesresidentselectiondifficult AT lahhamshadi whotointerviewlowadherencebyusmedicalschoolstomedicalstudentperformanceevaluationformatmakesresidentselectiondifficult AT langdorfmarki whotointerviewlowadherencebyusmedicalschoolstomedicalstudentperformanceevaluationformatmakesresidentselectiondifficult |