Cargando…
External validation of a clinical decision rule: we need events in a population in order to rule them out!
We respond to the Lorton et al. article on external validation of the PECARN study. With an event rate of only 0.6%, we believe that their study failed to confirm the safety of this rule. Such a low number of events should call for caution when interpreting the results of diagnostic tests.
Autores principales: | Freund, Yonathan, Philippon, Anne-Laure |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28086985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0346-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
External validation of clinical decision rules for children with wrist trauma
por: Mulders, Marjolein A. M., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
MOdified DIagnostic strateGy to safely ruLe-out pulmonary embolism In the emergency depArtment: study protocol for the Non-Inferiority MODIGLIANI cluster cross-over randomized trial
por: Philippon, Anne-Laure, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Ruling out Appendicitis in Children: Can We Use Clinical Prediction Rules?
por: van Amstel, Paul, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
External validation of a pediatric decision rule for blunt abdominal trauma
por: Sigal, Adam P., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
One spectrum to rule them all?
por: Gallego Cadavid, Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2017)