Cargando…
The fallacy of enrolling only high-risk subjects in cancer prevention trials: Is there a "free lunch"?
BACKGROUND: There is a common belief that most cancer prevention trials should be restricted to high-risk subjects in order to increase statistical power. This strategy is appropriate if the ultimate target population is subjects at the same high-risk. However if the target population is the general...
Autores principales: | Baker, Stuart G, Kramer, Barnett S, Corle, Donald |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC524373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15461821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-24 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?
por: Baker, Stuart G, et al.
Publicado: (2002) -
Correction: The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?
por: Baker, Stuart G, et al.
Publicado: (2003) -
Despise the free lunch
por: Almadi, Majid A, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Peers bring back free lunch
Publicado: (2002) -
Blow-up: a free lunch?
por: Koenderink, Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2012)