Cargando…
Factorial versus multi‐arm multi‐stage designs for clinical trials with multiple treatments
When several treatments are available for evaluation in a clinical trial, different design options are available. We compare multi‐arm multi‐stage with factorial designs, and in particular, we will consider a 2 × 2 factorial design, where groups of patients will either take treatments A, B, both or...
Autores principales: | Jaki, Thomas, Vasileiou, Despina |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5244690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27804166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.7159 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Optimal design for multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials
por: Wason, James MS, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
An order restricted multi‐arm multi‐stage clinical trial design
por: Serra, Alessandra, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Treatment selection in multi-arm, multi-stage clinical trials
por: Jaki, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Designing multi‐arm multi‐stage clinical trials using a risk–benefit criterion for treatment selection
por: Jaki, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Some recommendations for multi-arm multi-stage trials
por: Wason, James, et al.
Publicado: (2012)