Cargando…
Comparison of different sample preparation methods for platinum determination in cultured cells by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry
BACKGROUND: Platinum-based agents are widely used in chemotherapy against solid tumors and insufficient intracellular drug accumulation is one of the leading causes of platinum resistance which is associated with poor survival of tumor patients. Thus, the detection of intracellular platinum is pivot...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5248575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28123908 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2873 |
_version_ | 1782497289874440192 |
---|---|
author | Xiao, Man Huang, Zaiju Cai, Jing Jia, Jinghui Zhang, Yuzeng Dong, Weihong Wang, Zehua |
author_facet | Xiao, Man Huang, Zaiju Cai, Jing Jia, Jinghui Zhang, Yuzeng Dong, Weihong Wang, Zehua |
author_sort | Xiao, Man |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Platinum-based agents are widely used in chemotherapy against solid tumors and insufficient intracellular drug accumulation is one of the leading causes of platinum resistance which is associated with poor survival of tumor patients. Thus, the detection of intracellular platinum is pivotal for studies aiming to overcome platinum resistance. In the present study, we aimed to establish a reliable graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS)-based assay to quantify the intracellular platinum content for cultured cells. METHODS: Several most commonly applied cell preparation methods, including 0.2% HNO(3), 0.2% Triton X-100, concentrated nitric acid, RIPA combined with concentrated nitric acid and hydroxide, followed by GFAAS for platinum detection were compared in ovarian, cervical and liver cancer cell lines to obtain the optimal one, and parameters regarding linearity, accuracy, precision and sensitivity were evaluated. Influence of other metals on platinum detection and the storage conditions of samples were also determined. RESULTS: The treatment of cells with 0.2% HNO(3) was superior to other approaches with fewer platinum loss and better repeatability. The recovery rate and precision of this method were 97.3%–103.0% and 1.4%–3.8%, respectively. The average recoveries in the presence of other metals were 95.1%–103.1%. The detection limit was 13.23 ug/L. The recovery rate of platinum remained acceptable even in cell samples stored in −20 °C or −80 °C for two months. DISCUSSION: After comparison, we found that 0.2% HNO(3) was optimal for intracellular platinum quantification based on GFAAS, which presented values compatible with that of inductively-coupled plasma mass-spectrometry (ICP-MS), and this is partially attributed to the simplicity of this method. Moreover, the assay was proved to be accurate, sensitive, cost-effective and suitable for the research of platinum-based antitumor therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5248575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52485752017-01-25 Comparison of different sample preparation methods for platinum determination in cultured cells by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry Xiao, Man Huang, Zaiju Cai, Jing Jia, Jinghui Zhang, Yuzeng Dong, Weihong Wang, Zehua PeerJ Cell Biology BACKGROUND: Platinum-based agents are widely used in chemotherapy against solid tumors and insufficient intracellular drug accumulation is one of the leading causes of platinum resistance which is associated with poor survival of tumor patients. Thus, the detection of intracellular platinum is pivotal for studies aiming to overcome platinum resistance. In the present study, we aimed to establish a reliable graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS)-based assay to quantify the intracellular platinum content for cultured cells. METHODS: Several most commonly applied cell preparation methods, including 0.2% HNO(3), 0.2% Triton X-100, concentrated nitric acid, RIPA combined with concentrated nitric acid and hydroxide, followed by GFAAS for platinum detection were compared in ovarian, cervical and liver cancer cell lines to obtain the optimal one, and parameters regarding linearity, accuracy, precision and sensitivity were evaluated. Influence of other metals on platinum detection and the storage conditions of samples were also determined. RESULTS: The treatment of cells with 0.2% HNO(3) was superior to other approaches with fewer platinum loss and better repeatability. The recovery rate and precision of this method were 97.3%–103.0% and 1.4%–3.8%, respectively. The average recoveries in the presence of other metals were 95.1%–103.1%. The detection limit was 13.23 ug/L. The recovery rate of platinum remained acceptable even in cell samples stored in −20 °C or −80 °C for two months. DISCUSSION: After comparison, we found that 0.2% HNO(3) was optimal for intracellular platinum quantification based on GFAAS, which presented values compatible with that of inductively-coupled plasma mass-spectrometry (ICP-MS), and this is partially attributed to the simplicity of this method. Moreover, the assay was proved to be accurate, sensitive, cost-effective and suitable for the research of platinum-based antitumor therapy. PeerJ Inc. 2017-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5248575/ /pubmed/28123908 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2873 Text en ©2017 Xiao et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Cell Biology Xiao, Man Huang, Zaiju Cai, Jing Jia, Jinghui Zhang, Yuzeng Dong, Weihong Wang, Zehua Comparison of different sample preparation methods for platinum determination in cultured cells by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry |
title | Comparison of different sample preparation methods for platinum determination in cultured cells by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry |
title_full | Comparison of different sample preparation methods for platinum determination in cultured cells by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry |
title_fullStr | Comparison of different sample preparation methods for platinum determination in cultured cells by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of different sample preparation methods for platinum determination in cultured cells by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry |
title_short | Comparison of different sample preparation methods for platinum determination in cultured cells by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry |
title_sort | comparison of different sample preparation methods for platinum determination in cultured cells by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry |
topic | Cell Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5248575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28123908 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2873 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaoman comparisonofdifferentsamplepreparationmethodsforplatinumdeterminationinculturedcellsbygraphitefurnaceatomicabsorptionspectrometry AT huangzaiju comparisonofdifferentsamplepreparationmethodsforplatinumdeterminationinculturedcellsbygraphitefurnaceatomicabsorptionspectrometry AT caijing comparisonofdifferentsamplepreparationmethodsforplatinumdeterminationinculturedcellsbygraphitefurnaceatomicabsorptionspectrometry AT jiajinghui comparisonofdifferentsamplepreparationmethodsforplatinumdeterminationinculturedcellsbygraphitefurnaceatomicabsorptionspectrometry AT zhangyuzeng comparisonofdifferentsamplepreparationmethodsforplatinumdeterminationinculturedcellsbygraphitefurnaceatomicabsorptionspectrometry AT dongweihong comparisonofdifferentsamplepreparationmethodsforplatinumdeterminationinculturedcellsbygraphitefurnaceatomicabsorptionspectrometry AT wangzehua comparisonofdifferentsamplepreparationmethodsforplatinumdeterminationinculturedcellsbygraphitefurnaceatomicabsorptionspectrometry |