Cargando…

Clinical Impact of Minimal Residual Disease in Children with Different Subtypes of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with Response-Adapted Therapy

To determine the clinical significance of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with prognostically relevant subtypes of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), we analyzed data from 488 patients treated in St. Jude Total Therapy Study XV with treatment intensity based mainly on MRD level...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pui, Ching-Hon, Pei, Deqing, Raimondi, Susana C, Coustan-Smith, Elaine, Jeha, Sima, Cheng, Cheng, Bowman, W Paul, Sandlund, John T, Ribeiro, Raul C, Rubnitz, Jeffrey E, Inaba, Hiroto, Gruber, Tanja A, Leung, Wing H, Yang, Jun J, Downing, James R, Evans, William E, Relling, Mary V, Campana, Dario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27560110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.234
_version_ 1782504301263847424
author Pui, Ching-Hon
Pei, Deqing
Raimondi, Susana C
Coustan-Smith, Elaine
Jeha, Sima
Cheng, Cheng
Bowman, W Paul
Sandlund, John T
Ribeiro, Raul C
Rubnitz, Jeffrey E
Inaba, Hiroto
Gruber, Tanja A
Leung, Wing H
Yang, Jun J
Downing, James R
Evans, William E
Relling, Mary V
Campana, Dario
author_facet Pui, Ching-Hon
Pei, Deqing
Raimondi, Susana C
Coustan-Smith, Elaine
Jeha, Sima
Cheng, Cheng
Bowman, W Paul
Sandlund, John T
Ribeiro, Raul C
Rubnitz, Jeffrey E
Inaba, Hiroto
Gruber, Tanja A
Leung, Wing H
Yang, Jun J
Downing, James R
Evans, William E
Relling, Mary V
Campana, Dario
author_sort Pui, Ching-Hon
collection PubMed
description To determine the clinical significance of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with prognostically relevant subtypes of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), we analyzed data from 488 patients treated in St. Jude Total Therapy Study XV with treatment intensity based mainly on MRD levels measured during remission induction. MRD levels on day 19 predicted treatment outcome for patients with hyperdiploid >50 ALL, NCI standard-risk B-ALL or T-cell ALL, while MRD levels on day 46 were prognostic for patients with NCI standard-risk or high-risk B-ALL. Patients with t(12;21)/(ETV6-RUNX1) or hyperdiploidy >50 ALL had the best prognosis; those with a negative MRD on day 19 had a particularly low risk of relapse: 1.9% and 3.8%, respectively. Patients with NCI high-risk B-ALL or T-cell ALL had an inferior outcome; even with undetectable MRD on day 46, cumulative risk of relapse was 12.7% and 15.5%, respectively. Among patients with NCI standard-risk B-ALL, the outcome was intermediate overall but was poor if MRD was ≥1% on day ≥19 or MRD was detectable at any level on day 46. Our results indicate that the clinical impact of MRD on treatment outcome in childhood ALL varies considerably according to leukemia subtype and time of measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5288281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52882812017-02-18 Clinical Impact of Minimal Residual Disease in Children with Different Subtypes of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with Response-Adapted Therapy Pui, Ching-Hon Pei, Deqing Raimondi, Susana C Coustan-Smith, Elaine Jeha, Sima Cheng, Cheng Bowman, W Paul Sandlund, John T Ribeiro, Raul C Rubnitz, Jeffrey E Inaba, Hiroto Gruber, Tanja A Leung, Wing H Yang, Jun J Downing, James R Evans, William E Relling, Mary V Campana, Dario Leukemia Article To determine the clinical significance of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with prognostically relevant subtypes of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), we analyzed data from 488 patients treated in St. Jude Total Therapy Study XV with treatment intensity based mainly on MRD levels measured during remission induction. MRD levels on day 19 predicted treatment outcome for patients with hyperdiploid >50 ALL, NCI standard-risk B-ALL or T-cell ALL, while MRD levels on day 46 were prognostic for patients with NCI standard-risk or high-risk B-ALL. Patients with t(12;21)/(ETV6-RUNX1) or hyperdiploidy >50 ALL had the best prognosis; those with a negative MRD on day 19 had a particularly low risk of relapse: 1.9% and 3.8%, respectively. Patients with NCI high-risk B-ALL or T-cell ALL had an inferior outcome; even with undetectable MRD on day 46, cumulative risk of relapse was 12.7% and 15.5%, respectively. Among patients with NCI standard-risk B-ALL, the outcome was intermediate overall but was poor if MRD was ≥1% on day ≥19 or MRD was detectable at any level on day 46. Our results indicate that the clinical impact of MRD on treatment outcome in childhood ALL varies considerably according to leukemia subtype and time of measurement. 2016-08-18 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5288281/ /pubmed/27560110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.234 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Pui, Ching-Hon
Pei, Deqing
Raimondi, Susana C
Coustan-Smith, Elaine
Jeha, Sima
Cheng, Cheng
Bowman, W Paul
Sandlund, John T
Ribeiro, Raul C
Rubnitz, Jeffrey E
Inaba, Hiroto
Gruber, Tanja A
Leung, Wing H
Yang, Jun J
Downing, James R
Evans, William E
Relling, Mary V
Campana, Dario
Clinical Impact of Minimal Residual Disease in Children with Different Subtypes of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with Response-Adapted Therapy
title Clinical Impact of Minimal Residual Disease in Children with Different Subtypes of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with Response-Adapted Therapy
title_full Clinical Impact of Minimal Residual Disease in Children with Different Subtypes of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with Response-Adapted Therapy
title_fullStr Clinical Impact of Minimal Residual Disease in Children with Different Subtypes of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with Response-Adapted Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Impact of Minimal Residual Disease in Children with Different Subtypes of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with Response-Adapted Therapy
title_short Clinical Impact of Minimal Residual Disease in Children with Different Subtypes of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with Response-Adapted Therapy
title_sort clinical impact of minimal residual disease in children with different subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with response-adapted therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27560110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.234
work_keys_str_mv AT puichinghon clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT peideqing clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT raimondisusanac clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT coustansmithelaine clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT jehasima clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT chengcheng clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT bowmanwpaul clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT sandlundjohnt clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT ribeiroraulc clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT rubnitzjeffreye clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT inabahiroto clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT grubertanjaa clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT leungwingh clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT yangjunj clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT downingjamesr clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT evanswilliame clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT rellingmaryv clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy
AT campanadario clinicalimpactofminimalresidualdiseaseinchildrenwithdifferentsubtypesofacutelymphoblasticleukemiatreatedwithresponseadaptedtherapy