Cargando…
Are Luxury Brand Labels and “Green” Labels Costly Signals of Social Status? An Extended Replication
Costly signaling theory provides an explanation for why humans are willing to a pay a premium for conspicuous products such as luxury brand-labeled clothing or conspicuous environmentally friendly cars. According to the theory, the extra cost of such products is a signal of social status and wealth...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28170399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170216 |
_version_ | 1782505480562671616 |
---|---|
author | Berger, Joël |
author_facet | Berger, Joël |
author_sort | Berger, Joël |
collection | PubMed |
description | Costly signaling theory provides an explanation for why humans are willing to a pay a premium for conspicuous products such as luxury brand-labeled clothing or conspicuous environmentally friendly cars. According to the theory, the extra cost of such products is a signal of social status and wealth and leads to advantages in social interactions for the signaler. A previous study found positive evidence for the case of luxury brand labels. However, an issue of this study was that some of the experiments were not conducted in a perfectly double-blind manner. I resolved this by replicating variations of the original design in a double-blind procedure. Additionally, besides the luxury label condition, I introduced a “green” label condition. Thus, the hypothesis that signaling theory is able to explain pro-environmental behavior was tested for the first time in a natural field setting. Further, I conducted experiments in both average and below-average socioeconomic neighborhoods, where, according to signaling theory, the effects of luxury signals should be even stronger. In contrast to the original study, I did not find positive effects of the luxury brand label in any of the five experiments. Nor did I find evidence for a green-signaling effect. Moreover, in poor neighborhoods a negative tendency of the luxury label actually became evident. This suggests that a signaling theory explanation of costly labels must take into account the characteristics of the observers, e.g. their social status. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5295666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52956662017-02-17 Are Luxury Brand Labels and “Green” Labels Costly Signals of Social Status? An Extended Replication Berger, Joël PLoS One Research Article Costly signaling theory provides an explanation for why humans are willing to a pay a premium for conspicuous products such as luxury brand-labeled clothing or conspicuous environmentally friendly cars. According to the theory, the extra cost of such products is a signal of social status and wealth and leads to advantages in social interactions for the signaler. A previous study found positive evidence for the case of luxury brand labels. However, an issue of this study was that some of the experiments were not conducted in a perfectly double-blind manner. I resolved this by replicating variations of the original design in a double-blind procedure. Additionally, besides the luxury label condition, I introduced a “green” label condition. Thus, the hypothesis that signaling theory is able to explain pro-environmental behavior was tested for the first time in a natural field setting. Further, I conducted experiments in both average and below-average socioeconomic neighborhoods, where, according to signaling theory, the effects of luxury signals should be even stronger. In contrast to the original study, I did not find positive effects of the luxury brand label in any of the five experiments. Nor did I find evidence for a green-signaling effect. Moreover, in poor neighborhoods a negative tendency of the luxury label actually became evident. This suggests that a signaling theory explanation of costly labels must take into account the characteristics of the observers, e.g. their social status. Public Library of Science 2017-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5295666/ /pubmed/28170399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170216 Text en © 2017 Joël Berger http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Berger, Joël Are Luxury Brand Labels and “Green” Labels Costly Signals of Social Status? An Extended Replication |
title | Are Luxury Brand Labels and “Green” Labels Costly Signals of Social Status? An Extended Replication |
title_full | Are Luxury Brand Labels and “Green” Labels Costly Signals of Social Status? An Extended Replication |
title_fullStr | Are Luxury Brand Labels and “Green” Labels Costly Signals of Social Status? An Extended Replication |
title_full_unstemmed | Are Luxury Brand Labels and “Green” Labels Costly Signals of Social Status? An Extended Replication |
title_short | Are Luxury Brand Labels and “Green” Labels Costly Signals of Social Status? An Extended Replication |
title_sort | are luxury brand labels and “green” labels costly signals of social status? an extended replication |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28170399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bergerjoel areluxurybrandlabelsandgreenlabelscostlysignalsofsocialstatusanextendedreplication |