Cargando…

Systematic review of educational interventions for looked‐after children and young people: Recommendations for intervention development and evaluation

Looked‐after children and young people (LACYP) are educationally disadvantaged compared to the general population. A systematic review was conducted of randomised controlled trials evaluating interventions aimed at LACYP aged ≤18 years. Restrictions were not placed on delivery setting or delivery ag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Rhiannon, Brown, Rachel, Rees, Gwyther, Smith, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28239209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/berj.3252
_version_ 1782506029450264576
author Evans, Rhiannon
Brown, Rachel
Rees, Gwyther
Smith, Philip
author_facet Evans, Rhiannon
Brown, Rachel
Rees, Gwyther
Smith, Philip
author_sort Evans, Rhiannon
collection PubMed
description Looked‐after children and young people (LACYP) are educationally disadvantaged compared to the general population. A systematic review was conducted of randomised controlled trials evaluating interventions aimed at LACYP aged ≤18 years. Restrictions were not placed on delivery setting or delivery agent. Intervention outcomes were: academic skills; academic achievement and grade completion; special education status; homework completion; school attendance, suspension, and drop‐out; number of school placements; teacher‐student relationships; school behaviour; and academic attitudes. Fifteen studies reporting on 12 interventions met the inclusion criteria. Nine interventions demonstrated tentative impacts. However, evidence of effectiveness could not be ascertained due to variable methodological quality, as appraised by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Theoretical and methodological recommendations are provided to enhance the development and evaluation of educational interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5299458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52994582017-02-22 Systematic review of educational interventions for looked‐after children and young people: Recommendations for intervention development and evaluation Evans, Rhiannon Brown, Rachel Rees, Gwyther Smith, Philip Br Educ Res J Articles Looked‐after children and young people (LACYP) are educationally disadvantaged compared to the general population. A systematic review was conducted of randomised controlled trials evaluating interventions aimed at LACYP aged ≤18 years. Restrictions were not placed on delivery setting or delivery agent. Intervention outcomes were: academic skills; academic achievement and grade completion; special education status; homework completion; school attendance, suspension, and drop‐out; number of school placements; teacher‐student relationships; school behaviour; and academic attitudes. Fifteen studies reporting on 12 interventions met the inclusion criteria. Nine interventions demonstrated tentative impacts. However, evidence of effectiveness could not be ascertained due to variable methodological quality, as appraised by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Theoretical and methodological recommendations are provided to enhance the development and evaluation of educational interventions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-11-17 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5299458/ /pubmed/28239209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/berj.3252 Text en © 2016 The Authors. British Educational Research Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Educational Research Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Evans, Rhiannon
Brown, Rachel
Rees, Gwyther
Smith, Philip
Systematic review of educational interventions for looked‐after children and young people: Recommendations for intervention development and evaluation
title Systematic review of educational interventions for looked‐after children and young people: Recommendations for intervention development and evaluation
title_full Systematic review of educational interventions for looked‐after children and young people: Recommendations for intervention development and evaluation
title_fullStr Systematic review of educational interventions for looked‐after children and young people: Recommendations for intervention development and evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of educational interventions for looked‐after children and young people: Recommendations for intervention development and evaluation
title_short Systematic review of educational interventions for looked‐after children and young people: Recommendations for intervention development and evaluation
title_sort systematic review of educational interventions for looked‐after children and young people: recommendations for intervention development and evaluation
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28239209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/berj.3252
work_keys_str_mv AT evansrhiannon systematicreviewofeducationalinterventionsforlookedafterchildrenandyoungpeoplerecommendationsforinterventiondevelopmentandevaluation
AT brownrachel systematicreviewofeducationalinterventionsforlookedafterchildrenandyoungpeoplerecommendationsforinterventiondevelopmentandevaluation
AT reesgwyther systematicreviewofeducationalinterventionsforlookedafterchildrenandyoungpeoplerecommendationsforinterventiondevelopmentandevaluation
AT smithphilip systematicreviewofeducationalinterventionsforlookedafterchildrenandyoungpeoplerecommendationsforinterventiondevelopmentandevaluation