Cargando…

Feedback in the nonshifting context of the midwifery clinical education in Indonesia: A mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Clinical education in some countries applies a hospital-based learning approach where each student rotates to one division to another division (call of shifting). However, for clinical midwifery education in Indonesia each student remains in a community midwifery clinic (call of nonshift...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nugraheny, Esti, Claramita, Mora, Rahayu, Gandes R., Kumara, Amitya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5301072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28194205
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.197671
_version_ 1782506293997600768
author Nugraheny, Esti
Claramita, Mora
Rahayu, Gandes R.
Kumara, Amitya
author_facet Nugraheny, Esti
Claramita, Mora
Rahayu, Gandes R.
Kumara, Amitya
author_sort Nugraheny, Esti
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical education in some countries applies a hospital-based learning approach where each student rotates to one division to another division (call of shifting). However, for clinical midwifery education in Indonesia each student remains in a community midwifery clinic (call of nonshifting). Because of the differences in the shifting system used, the question of “How is feedback in the nonshifting context of the clinical midwifery education being given?” needs to be explored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a mixed methods study and was carried out in a School of Midwifery in Indonesia during 2014 and 2015. We explored the supervisors’ and students’ perception on the feedback delivery. Students’ perceptions were collected through focus group discussions whereas supervisors’ perceptions were recorded through interviews. The quality of feedback was observed using a checklist. Qualitative data were analyzed using Atlas Ti and quantitative data were analyzed using a descriptive statistic method. RESULTS: From the qualitative data, students and supervisors perceived their feedback as “more intensive.” They reported authenticity in the monitoring and feedback from the day-to-day delivery of patient care with their supervisors. Students and supervisors also described their feedback as “more integrated.” The feedback process stimulated students to value history taking, physical examination, and midwifery care. On the other hand, quantitative data from observations presented that “intensive and integrated feedback” were not supported by the quality of the feedback based on literature of the theory of facilitating learning (the mean was 4.67 on a scale of 0–9). CONCLUSIONS: The nonshifting clinical midwifery education can be a better alternative for facilitating the process of providing integrated and intensive feedback. To improve the quality of the feedback, training on providing feedback in a nonshifting context is fundamental in Indonesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5301072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53010722017-02-13 Feedback in the nonshifting context of the midwifery clinical education in Indonesia: A mixed methods study Nugraheny, Esti Claramita, Mora Rahayu, Gandes R. Kumara, Amitya Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Clinical education in some countries applies a hospital-based learning approach where each student rotates to one division to another division (call of shifting). However, for clinical midwifery education in Indonesia each student remains in a community midwifery clinic (call of nonshifting). Because of the differences in the shifting system used, the question of “How is feedback in the nonshifting context of the clinical midwifery education being given?” needs to be explored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a mixed methods study and was carried out in a School of Midwifery in Indonesia during 2014 and 2015. We explored the supervisors’ and students’ perception on the feedback delivery. Students’ perceptions were collected through focus group discussions whereas supervisors’ perceptions were recorded through interviews. The quality of feedback was observed using a checklist. Qualitative data were analyzed using Atlas Ti and quantitative data were analyzed using a descriptive statistic method. RESULTS: From the qualitative data, students and supervisors perceived their feedback as “more intensive.” They reported authenticity in the monitoring and feedback from the day-to-day delivery of patient care with their supervisors. Students and supervisors also described their feedback as “more integrated.” The feedback process stimulated students to value history taking, physical examination, and midwifery care. On the other hand, quantitative data from observations presented that “intensive and integrated feedback” were not supported by the quality of the feedback based on literature of the theory of facilitating learning (the mean was 4.67 on a scale of 0–9). CONCLUSIONS: The nonshifting clinical midwifery education can be a better alternative for facilitating the process of providing integrated and intensive feedback. To improve the quality of the feedback, training on providing feedback in a nonshifting context is fundamental in Indonesia. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5301072/ /pubmed/28194205 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.197671 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nugraheny, Esti
Claramita, Mora
Rahayu, Gandes R.
Kumara, Amitya
Feedback in the nonshifting context of the midwifery clinical education in Indonesia: A mixed methods study
title Feedback in the nonshifting context of the midwifery clinical education in Indonesia: A mixed methods study
title_full Feedback in the nonshifting context of the midwifery clinical education in Indonesia: A mixed methods study
title_fullStr Feedback in the nonshifting context of the midwifery clinical education in Indonesia: A mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Feedback in the nonshifting context of the midwifery clinical education in Indonesia: A mixed methods study
title_short Feedback in the nonshifting context of the midwifery clinical education in Indonesia: A mixed methods study
title_sort feedback in the nonshifting context of the midwifery clinical education in indonesia: a mixed methods study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5301072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28194205
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.197671
work_keys_str_mv AT nugrahenyesti feedbackinthenonshiftingcontextofthemidwiferyclinicaleducationinindonesiaamixedmethodsstudy
AT claramitamora feedbackinthenonshiftingcontextofthemidwiferyclinicaleducationinindonesiaamixedmethodsstudy
AT rahayugandesr feedbackinthenonshiftingcontextofthemidwiferyclinicaleducationinindonesiaamixedmethodsstudy
AT kumaraamitya feedbackinthenonshiftingcontextofthemidwiferyclinicaleducationinindonesiaamixedmethodsstudy