Cargando…

Generating evidence on a risk-based monitoring approach in the academic setting – lessons learned

BACKGROUND: In spite of efforts to employ risk-based strategies to increase monitoring efficiency in the academic setting, empirical evidence on their effectiveness remains sparse. This mixed-methods study aimed to evaluate the risk-based on-site monitoring approach currently followed at our academi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Niederhäusern, Belinda, Orleth, Annette, Schädelin, Sabine, Rawi, Nawal, Velkopolszky, Martin, Becherer, Claudia, Benkert, Pascal, Satalkar, Priya, Briel, Matthias, Pauli-Magnus, Christiane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5307807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28193170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0308-6
_version_ 1782507436263866368
author von Niederhäusern, Belinda
Orleth, Annette
Schädelin, Sabine
Rawi, Nawal
Velkopolszky, Martin
Becherer, Claudia
Benkert, Pascal
Satalkar, Priya
Briel, Matthias
Pauli-Magnus, Christiane
author_facet von Niederhäusern, Belinda
Orleth, Annette
Schädelin, Sabine
Rawi, Nawal
Velkopolszky, Martin
Becherer, Claudia
Benkert, Pascal
Satalkar, Priya
Briel, Matthias
Pauli-Magnus, Christiane
author_sort von Niederhäusern, Belinda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In spite of efforts to employ risk-based strategies to increase monitoring efficiency in the academic setting, empirical evidence on their effectiveness remains sparse. This mixed-methods study aimed to evaluate the risk-based on-site monitoring approach currently followed at our academic institution. METHODS: We selected all studies monitored by the Clinical Trial Unit (CTU) according to Risk ADApted MONitoring (ADAMON) at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, between 01.01.2012 and 31.12.2014. We extracted study characteristics and monitoring information from the CTU Enterprise Resource Management system and from monitoring reports of all selected studies. We summarized the data descriptively. Additionally, we conducted semi-structured interviews with the three current CTU monitors. RESULTS: During the observation period, a total of 214 monitoring visits were conducted in 43 studies resulting in 2961 documented monitoring findings. Our risk-based approach predominantly identified administrative (46.2%) and patient right findings (49.1%). We identified observational study design, high ADAMON risk category, industry sponsorship, the presence of an electronic database, experienced site staff, and inclusion of vulnerable study population to be factors associated with lower numbers of findings. The monitors understand the positive aspects of a risk-based approach but fear missing systematic errors due to the low frequency of visits. CONCLUSIONS: We show that the factors mostly increasing the risk for on-site monitoring findings are underrepresented in the current risk analysis scheme. Our risk-based on-site approach should further be complemented by centralized data checks, allowing monitors to transform their role towards partners for overall trial quality, and success. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0308-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5307807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53078072017-02-22 Generating evidence on a risk-based monitoring approach in the academic setting – lessons learned von Niederhäusern, Belinda Orleth, Annette Schädelin, Sabine Rawi, Nawal Velkopolszky, Martin Becherer, Claudia Benkert, Pascal Satalkar, Priya Briel, Matthias Pauli-Magnus, Christiane BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: In spite of efforts to employ risk-based strategies to increase monitoring efficiency in the academic setting, empirical evidence on their effectiveness remains sparse. This mixed-methods study aimed to evaluate the risk-based on-site monitoring approach currently followed at our academic institution. METHODS: We selected all studies monitored by the Clinical Trial Unit (CTU) according to Risk ADApted MONitoring (ADAMON) at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, between 01.01.2012 and 31.12.2014. We extracted study characteristics and monitoring information from the CTU Enterprise Resource Management system and from monitoring reports of all selected studies. We summarized the data descriptively. Additionally, we conducted semi-structured interviews with the three current CTU monitors. RESULTS: During the observation period, a total of 214 monitoring visits were conducted in 43 studies resulting in 2961 documented monitoring findings. Our risk-based approach predominantly identified administrative (46.2%) and patient right findings (49.1%). We identified observational study design, high ADAMON risk category, industry sponsorship, the presence of an electronic database, experienced site staff, and inclusion of vulnerable study population to be factors associated with lower numbers of findings. The monitors understand the positive aspects of a risk-based approach but fear missing systematic errors due to the low frequency of visits. CONCLUSIONS: We show that the factors mostly increasing the risk for on-site monitoring findings are underrepresented in the current risk analysis scheme. Our risk-based on-site approach should further be complemented by centralized data checks, allowing monitors to transform their role towards partners for overall trial quality, and success. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0308-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5307807/ /pubmed/28193170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0308-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
von Niederhäusern, Belinda
Orleth, Annette
Schädelin, Sabine
Rawi, Nawal
Velkopolszky, Martin
Becherer, Claudia
Benkert, Pascal
Satalkar, Priya
Briel, Matthias
Pauli-Magnus, Christiane
Generating evidence on a risk-based monitoring approach in the academic setting – lessons learned
title Generating evidence on a risk-based monitoring approach in the academic setting – lessons learned
title_full Generating evidence on a risk-based monitoring approach in the academic setting – lessons learned
title_fullStr Generating evidence on a risk-based monitoring approach in the academic setting – lessons learned
title_full_unstemmed Generating evidence on a risk-based monitoring approach in the academic setting – lessons learned
title_short Generating evidence on a risk-based monitoring approach in the academic setting – lessons learned
title_sort generating evidence on a risk-based monitoring approach in the academic setting – lessons learned
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5307807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28193170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0308-6
work_keys_str_mv AT vonniederhausernbelinda generatingevidenceonariskbasedmonitoringapproachintheacademicsettinglessonslearned
AT orlethannette generatingevidenceonariskbasedmonitoringapproachintheacademicsettinglessonslearned
AT schadelinsabine generatingevidenceonariskbasedmonitoringapproachintheacademicsettinglessonslearned
AT rawinawal generatingevidenceonariskbasedmonitoringapproachintheacademicsettinglessonslearned
AT velkopolszkymartin generatingevidenceonariskbasedmonitoringapproachintheacademicsettinglessonslearned
AT bechererclaudia generatingevidenceonariskbasedmonitoringapproachintheacademicsettinglessonslearned
AT benkertpascal generatingevidenceonariskbasedmonitoringapproachintheacademicsettinglessonslearned
AT satalkarpriya generatingevidenceonariskbasedmonitoringapproachintheacademicsettinglessonslearned
AT brielmatthias generatingevidenceonariskbasedmonitoringapproachintheacademicsettinglessonslearned
AT paulimagnuschristiane generatingevidenceonariskbasedmonitoringapproachintheacademicsettinglessonslearned