Cargando…

The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing

Target fishing often relies on the use of reverse docking to identify potential target proteins of ligands from protein database. The limitation of reverse docking is the accuracy of current scoring funtions used to distinguish true target from non-target proteins. Many contemporary scoring function...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Qiyao, Zhao, Liang, Hu, Jianxing, Jin, Hongwei, Liu, Zhenming, Zhang, Liangren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5308821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28196116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171433
_version_ 1782507606482354176
author Luo, Qiyao
Zhao, Liang
Hu, Jianxing
Jin, Hongwei
Liu, Zhenming
Zhang, Liangren
author_facet Luo, Qiyao
Zhao, Liang
Hu, Jianxing
Jin, Hongwei
Liu, Zhenming
Zhang, Liangren
author_sort Luo, Qiyao
collection PubMed
description Target fishing often relies on the use of reverse docking to identify potential target proteins of ligands from protein database. The limitation of reverse docking is the accuracy of current scoring funtions used to distinguish true target from non-target proteins. Many contemporary scoring functions are designed for the virtual screening of small molecules without special optimization for reverse docking, which would be easily influenced by the properties of protein pockets, resulting in scoring bias to the proteins with certain properties. This bias would cause lots of false positives in reverse docking, interferring the identification of true targets. In this paper, we have conducted a large-scale reverse docking (5000 molecules to 100 proteins) to study the scoring bias in reverse docking by DOCK, Glide, and AutoDock Vina. And we found that there were actually some frequency hits, namely interference proteins in all three docking procedures. After analyzing the differences of pocket properties between these interference proteins and the others, we speculated that the interference proteins have larger contact area (related to the size and shape of protein pockets) with ligands (for all three docking programs) or higher hydrophobicity (for Glide), which could be the causes of scoring bias. Then we applied the score normalization method to eliminate this scoring bias, which was effective to make docking score more balanced between different proteins in the reverse docking of benchmark dataset. Later, the Astex Diver Set was utilized to validate the effect of score normalization on actual cases of reverse docking, showing that the accuracy of target prediction significantly increased by 21.5% in the reverse docking by Glide after score normalization, though there was no obvious change in the reverse docking by DOCK and AutoDock Vina. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of score normalization to eliminate the scoring bias and improve the accuracy of target prediction in reverse docking. Moreover, the properties of protein pockets causing scoring bias to certain proteins we found here can provide the theory basis to further optimize the scoring functions of docking programs for future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5308821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53088212017-02-28 The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing Luo, Qiyao Zhao, Liang Hu, Jianxing Jin, Hongwei Liu, Zhenming Zhang, Liangren PLoS One Research Article Target fishing often relies on the use of reverse docking to identify potential target proteins of ligands from protein database. The limitation of reverse docking is the accuracy of current scoring funtions used to distinguish true target from non-target proteins. Many contemporary scoring functions are designed for the virtual screening of small molecules without special optimization for reverse docking, which would be easily influenced by the properties of protein pockets, resulting in scoring bias to the proteins with certain properties. This bias would cause lots of false positives in reverse docking, interferring the identification of true targets. In this paper, we have conducted a large-scale reverse docking (5000 molecules to 100 proteins) to study the scoring bias in reverse docking by DOCK, Glide, and AutoDock Vina. And we found that there were actually some frequency hits, namely interference proteins in all three docking procedures. After analyzing the differences of pocket properties between these interference proteins and the others, we speculated that the interference proteins have larger contact area (related to the size and shape of protein pockets) with ligands (for all three docking programs) or higher hydrophobicity (for Glide), which could be the causes of scoring bias. Then we applied the score normalization method to eliminate this scoring bias, which was effective to make docking score more balanced between different proteins in the reverse docking of benchmark dataset. Later, the Astex Diver Set was utilized to validate the effect of score normalization on actual cases of reverse docking, showing that the accuracy of target prediction significantly increased by 21.5% in the reverse docking by Glide after score normalization, though there was no obvious change in the reverse docking by DOCK and AutoDock Vina. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of score normalization to eliminate the scoring bias and improve the accuracy of target prediction in reverse docking. Moreover, the properties of protein pockets causing scoring bias to certain proteins we found here can provide the theory basis to further optimize the scoring functions of docking programs for future research. Public Library of Science 2017-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5308821/ /pubmed/28196116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171433 Text en © 2017 Luo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Luo, Qiyao
Zhao, Liang
Hu, Jianxing
Jin, Hongwei
Liu, Zhenming
Zhang, Liangren
The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing
title The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing
title_full The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing
title_fullStr The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing
title_full_unstemmed The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing
title_short The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing
title_sort scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5308821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28196116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171433
work_keys_str_mv AT luoqiyao thescoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing
AT zhaoliang thescoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing
AT hujianxing thescoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing
AT jinhongwei thescoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing
AT liuzhenming thescoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing
AT zhangliangren thescoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing
AT luoqiyao scoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing
AT zhaoliang scoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing
AT hujianxing scoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing
AT jinhongwei scoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing
AT liuzhenming scoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing
AT zhangliangren scoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing