Cargando…
The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing
Target fishing often relies on the use of reverse docking to identify potential target proteins of ligands from protein database. The limitation of reverse docking is the accuracy of current scoring funtions used to distinguish true target from non-target proteins. Many contemporary scoring function...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5308821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28196116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171433 |
_version_ | 1782507606482354176 |
---|---|
author | Luo, Qiyao Zhao, Liang Hu, Jianxing Jin, Hongwei Liu, Zhenming Zhang, Liangren |
author_facet | Luo, Qiyao Zhao, Liang Hu, Jianxing Jin, Hongwei Liu, Zhenming Zhang, Liangren |
author_sort | Luo, Qiyao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Target fishing often relies on the use of reverse docking to identify potential target proteins of ligands from protein database. The limitation of reverse docking is the accuracy of current scoring funtions used to distinguish true target from non-target proteins. Many contemporary scoring functions are designed for the virtual screening of small molecules without special optimization for reverse docking, which would be easily influenced by the properties of protein pockets, resulting in scoring bias to the proteins with certain properties. This bias would cause lots of false positives in reverse docking, interferring the identification of true targets. In this paper, we have conducted a large-scale reverse docking (5000 molecules to 100 proteins) to study the scoring bias in reverse docking by DOCK, Glide, and AutoDock Vina. And we found that there were actually some frequency hits, namely interference proteins in all three docking procedures. After analyzing the differences of pocket properties between these interference proteins and the others, we speculated that the interference proteins have larger contact area (related to the size and shape of protein pockets) with ligands (for all three docking programs) or higher hydrophobicity (for Glide), which could be the causes of scoring bias. Then we applied the score normalization method to eliminate this scoring bias, which was effective to make docking score more balanced between different proteins in the reverse docking of benchmark dataset. Later, the Astex Diver Set was utilized to validate the effect of score normalization on actual cases of reverse docking, showing that the accuracy of target prediction significantly increased by 21.5% in the reverse docking by Glide after score normalization, though there was no obvious change in the reverse docking by DOCK and AutoDock Vina. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of score normalization to eliminate the scoring bias and improve the accuracy of target prediction in reverse docking. Moreover, the properties of protein pockets causing scoring bias to certain proteins we found here can provide the theory basis to further optimize the scoring functions of docking programs for future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5308821 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53088212017-02-28 The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing Luo, Qiyao Zhao, Liang Hu, Jianxing Jin, Hongwei Liu, Zhenming Zhang, Liangren PLoS One Research Article Target fishing often relies on the use of reverse docking to identify potential target proteins of ligands from protein database. The limitation of reverse docking is the accuracy of current scoring funtions used to distinguish true target from non-target proteins. Many contemporary scoring functions are designed for the virtual screening of small molecules without special optimization for reverse docking, which would be easily influenced by the properties of protein pockets, resulting in scoring bias to the proteins with certain properties. This bias would cause lots of false positives in reverse docking, interferring the identification of true targets. In this paper, we have conducted a large-scale reverse docking (5000 molecules to 100 proteins) to study the scoring bias in reverse docking by DOCK, Glide, and AutoDock Vina. And we found that there were actually some frequency hits, namely interference proteins in all three docking procedures. After analyzing the differences of pocket properties between these interference proteins and the others, we speculated that the interference proteins have larger contact area (related to the size and shape of protein pockets) with ligands (for all three docking programs) or higher hydrophobicity (for Glide), which could be the causes of scoring bias. Then we applied the score normalization method to eliminate this scoring bias, which was effective to make docking score more balanced between different proteins in the reverse docking of benchmark dataset. Later, the Astex Diver Set was utilized to validate the effect of score normalization on actual cases of reverse docking, showing that the accuracy of target prediction significantly increased by 21.5% in the reverse docking by Glide after score normalization, though there was no obvious change in the reverse docking by DOCK and AutoDock Vina. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of score normalization to eliminate the scoring bias and improve the accuracy of target prediction in reverse docking. Moreover, the properties of protein pockets causing scoring bias to certain proteins we found here can provide the theory basis to further optimize the scoring functions of docking programs for future research. Public Library of Science 2017-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5308821/ /pubmed/28196116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171433 Text en © 2017 Luo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Luo, Qiyao Zhao, Liang Hu, Jianxing Jin, Hongwei Liu, Zhenming Zhang, Liangren The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing |
title | The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing |
title_full | The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing |
title_fullStr | The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing |
title_full_unstemmed | The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing |
title_short | The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing |
title_sort | scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5308821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28196116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171433 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luoqiyao thescoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing AT zhaoliang thescoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing AT hujianxing thescoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing AT jinhongwei thescoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing AT liuzhenming thescoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing AT zhangliangren thescoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing AT luoqiyao scoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing AT zhaoliang scoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing AT hujianxing scoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing AT jinhongwei scoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing AT liuzhenming scoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing AT zhangliangren scoringbiasinreversedockingandthescorenormalizationstrategytoimprovesuccessrateoftargetfishing |