Cargando…
Allometric Scaling of Clearance in Paediatric Patients: When Does the Magic of 0.75 Fade?
Allometric scaling on the basis of bodyweight raised to the power of 0.75 (AS0.75) is frequently used to scale size-related changes in plasma clearance (CL(p)) from adults to children. A systematic assessment of its applicability is undertaken for scenarios considering size-related changes with and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27510367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-016-0436-x |
_version_ | 1782508715791876096 |
---|---|
author | Calvier, Elisa A. M. Krekels, Elke H. J. Välitalo, Pyry A. J. Rostami-Hodjegan, Amin Tibboel, Dick Danhof, Meindert Knibbe, Catherijne A. J. |
author_facet | Calvier, Elisa A. M. Krekels, Elke H. J. Välitalo, Pyry A. J. Rostami-Hodjegan, Amin Tibboel, Dick Danhof, Meindert Knibbe, Catherijne A. J. |
author_sort | Calvier, Elisa A. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Allometric scaling on the basis of bodyweight raised to the power of 0.75 (AS0.75) is frequently used to scale size-related changes in plasma clearance (CL(p)) from adults to children. A systematic assessment of its applicability is undertaken for scenarios considering size-related changes with and without maturation processes. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) simulation workflow was developed in R for 12,620 hypothetical drugs. In scenario one, only size-related changes in liver weight, hepatic blood flow, and glomerular filtration were included in simulations of ‘true’ paediatric CL(p). In a second scenario, maturation in unbound microsomal intrinsic clearance (CL(int,mic)), plasma protein concentration, and haematocrit were also included in these simulated ‘true’ paediatric CL(p) values. For both scenarios, the prediction error (PE) of AS0.75-based paediatric CL(p) predictions was assessed, while, for the first scenario, an allometric exponent was also estimated based on ‘true’ CL(p). In the first scenario, the PE of AS0.75-based paediatric CL(p) predictions reached up to 278 % in neonates, and the allometric exponent was estimated to range from 0.50 to 1.20 depending on age and drug properties. In the second scenario, the PE sensitivity to drug properties and maturation was higher in the youngest children, with AS0.75 resulting in accurate CL(p) predictions above 5 years of age. Using PBPK principles, there is no evidence for one unique allometric exponent in paediatric patients, even in scenarios that only consider size-related changes. As PE is most sensitive to the allometric exponent, drug properties and maturation in younger children, AS0.75 leads to increasingly worse predictions with decreasing age. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40262-016-0436-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5315734 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53157342017-03-02 Allometric Scaling of Clearance in Paediatric Patients: When Does the Magic of 0.75 Fade? Calvier, Elisa A. M. Krekels, Elke H. J. Välitalo, Pyry A. J. Rostami-Hodjegan, Amin Tibboel, Dick Danhof, Meindert Knibbe, Catherijne A. J. Clin Pharmacokinet Original Research Article Allometric scaling on the basis of bodyweight raised to the power of 0.75 (AS0.75) is frequently used to scale size-related changes in plasma clearance (CL(p)) from adults to children. A systematic assessment of its applicability is undertaken for scenarios considering size-related changes with and without maturation processes. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) simulation workflow was developed in R for 12,620 hypothetical drugs. In scenario one, only size-related changes in liver weight, hepatic blood flow, and glomerular filtration were included in simulations of ‘true’ paediatric CL(p). In a second scenario, maturation in unbound microsomal intrinsic clearance (CL(int,mic)), plasma protein concentration, and haematocrit were also included in these simulated ‘true’ paediatric CL(p) values. For both scenarios, the prediction error (PE) of AS0.75-based paediatric CL(p) predictions was assessed, while, for the first scenario, an allometric exponent was also estimated based on ‘true’ CL(p). In the first scenario, the PE of AS0.75-based paediatric CL(p) predictions reached up to 278 % in neonates, and the allometric exponent was estimated to range from 0.50 to 1.20 depending on age and drug properties. In the second scenario, the PE sensitivity to drug properties and maturation was higher in the youngest children, with AS0.75 resulting in accurate CL(p) predictions above 5 years of age. Using PBPK principles, there is no evidence for one unique allometric exponent in paediatric patients, even in scenarios that only consider size-related changes. As PE is most sensitive to the allometric exponent, drug properties and maturation in younger children, AS0.75 leads to increasingly worse predictions with decreasing age. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40262-016-0436-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-08-10 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5315734/ /pubmed/27510367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-016-0436-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Calvier, Elisa A. M. Krekels, Elke H. J. Välitalo, Pyry A. J. Rostami-Hodjegan, Amin Tibboel, Dick Danhof, Meindert Knibbe, Catherijne A. J. Allometric Scaling of Clearance in Paediatric Patients: When Does the Magic of 0.75 Fade? |
title | Allometric Scaling of Clearance in Paediatric Patients: When Does the Magic of 0.75 Fade? |
title_full | Allometric Scaling of Clearance in Paediatric Patients: When Does the Magic of 0.75 Fade? |
title_fullStr | Allometric Scaling of Clearance in Paediatric Patients: When Does the Magic of 0.75 Fade? |
title_full_unstemmed | Allometric Scaling of Clearance in Paediatric Patients: When Does the Magic of 0.75 Fade? |
title_short | Allometric Scaling of Clearance in Paediatric Patients: When Does the Magic of 0.75 Fade? |
title_sort | allometric scaling of clearance in paediatric patients: when does the magic of 0.75 fade? |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27510367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-016-0436-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT calvierelisaam allometricscalingofclearanceinpaediatricpatientswhendoesthemagicof075fade AT krekelselkehj allometricscalingofclearanceinpaediatricpatientswhendoesthemagicof075fade AT valitalopyryaj allometricscalingofclearanceinpaediatricpatientswhendoesthemagicof075fade AT rostamihodjeganamin allometricscalingofclearanceinpaediatricpatientswhendoesthemagicof075fade AT tibboeldick allometricscalingofclearanceinpaediatricpatientswhendoesthemagicof075fade AT danhofmeindert allometricscalingofclearanceinpaediatricpatientswhendoesthemagicof075fade AT knibbecatherijneaj allometricscalingofclearanceinpaediatricpatientswhendoesthemagicof075fade |