Cargando…

(13)C ENDOR Spectroscopy of Lipoxygenase–Substrate Complexes Reveals the Structural Basis for C–H Activation by Tunneling

[Image: see text] In enzymatic C–H activation by hydrogen tunneling, reduced barrier width is important for efficient hydrogen wave function overlap during catalysis. For native enzymes displaying nonadiabatic tunneling, the dominant reactive hydrogen donor–acceptor distance (DAD) is typically ca. 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horitani, Masaki, Offenbacher, Adam R., Carr, Cody A. Marcus, Yu, Tao, Hoeke, Veronika, Cutsail, George E., Hammes-Schiffer, Sharon, Klinman, Judith P., Hoffman, Brian M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5322796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28121140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b11856
_version_ 1782509917758816256
author Horitani, Masaki
Offenbacher, Adam R.
Carr, Cody A. Marcus
Yu, Tao
Hoeke, Veronika
Cutsail, George E.
Hammes-Schiffer, Sharon
Klinman, Judith P.
Hoffman, Brian M.
author_facet Horitani, Masaki
Offenbacher, Adam R.
Carr, Cody A. Marcus
Yu, Tao
Hoeke, Veronika
Cutsail, George E.
Hammes-Schiffer, Sharon
Klinman, Judith P.
Hoffman, Brian M.
author_sort Horitani, Masaki
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] In enzymatic C–H activation by hydrogen tunneling, reduced barrier width is important for efficient hydrogen wave function overlap during catalysis. For native enzymes displaying nonadiabatic tunneling, the dominant reactive hydrogen donor–acceptor distance (DAD) is typically ca. 2.7 Å, considerably shorter than normal van der Waals distances. Without a ground state substrate-bound structure for the prototypical nonadiabatic tunneling system, soybean lipoxygenase (SLO), it has remained unclear whether the requisite close tunneling distance occurs through an unusual ground state active site arrangement or by thermally sampling conformational substates. Herein, we introduce Mn(2+) as a spin-probe surrogate for the SLO Fe ion; X-ray diffraction shows Mn-SLO is structurally faithful to the native enzyme. (13)C ENDOR then reveals the locations of (13)C10 and reactive (13)C11 of linoleic acid relative to the metal; (1)H ENDOR and molecular dynamics simulations of the fully solvated SLO model using ENDOR-derived restraints give additional metrical information. The resulting three-dimensional representation of the SLO active site ground state contains a reactive (a) conformer with hydrogen DAD of ∼3.1 Å, approximately van der Waals contact, plus an inactive (b) conformer with even longer DAD, establishing that stochastic conformational sampling is required to achieve reactive tunneling geometries. Tunneling-impaired SLO variants show increased DADs and variations in substrate positioning and rigidity, confirming previous kinetic and theoretical predictions of such behavior. Overall, this investigation highlights the (i) predictive power of nonadiabatic quantum treatments of proton-coupled electron transfer in SLO and (ii) sensitivity of ENDOR probes to test, detect, and corroborate kinetically predicted trends in active site reactivity and to reveal unexpected features of active site architecture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5322796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53227962018-01-25 (13)C ENDOR Spectroscopy of Lipoxygenase–Substrate Complexes Reveals the Structural Basis for C–H Activation by Tunneling Horitani, Masaki Offenbacher, Adam R. Carr, Cody A. Marcus Yu, Tao Hoeke, Veronika Cutsail, George E. Hammes-Schiffer, Sharon Klinman, Judith P. Hoffman, Brian M. J Am Chem Soc [Image: see text] In enzymatic C–H activation by hydrogen tunneling, reduced barrier width is important for efficient hydrogen wave function overlap during catalysis. For native enzymes displaying nonadiabatic tunneling, the dominant reactive hydrogen donor–acceptor distance (DAD) is typically ca. 2.7 Å, considerably shorter than normal van der Waals distances. Without a ground state substrate-bound structure for the prototypical nonadiabatic tunneling system, soybean lipoxygenase (SLO), it has remained unclear whether the requisite close tunneling distance occurs through an unusual ground state active site arrangement or by thermally sampling conformational substates. Herein, we introduce Mn(2+) as a spin-probe surrogate for the SLO Fe ion; X-ray diffraction shows Mn-SLO is structurally faithful to the native enzyme. (13)C ENDOR then reveals the locations of (13)C10 and reactive (13)C11 of linoleic acid relative to the metal; (1)H ENDOR and molecular dynamics simulations of the fully solvated SLO model using ENDOR-derived restraints give additional metrical information. The resulting three-dimensional representation of the SLO active site ground state contains a reactive (a) conformer with hydrogen DAD of ∼3.1 Å, approximately van der Waals contact, plus an inactive (b) conformer with even longer DAD, establishing that stochastic conformational sampling is required to achieve reactive tunneling geometries. Tunneling-impaired SLO variants show increased DADs and variations in substrate positioning and rigidity, confirming previous kinetic and theoretical predictions of such behavior. Overall, this investigation highlights the (i) predictive power of nonadiabatic quantum treatments of proton-coupled electron transfer in SLO and (ii) sensitivity of ENDOR probes to test, detect, and corroborate kinetically predicted trends in active site reactivity and to reveal unexpected features of active site architecture. American Chemical Society 2017-01-25 2017-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5322796/ /pubmed/28121140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b11856 Text en Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Horitani, Masaki
Offenbacher, Adam R.
Carr, Cody A. Marcus
Yu, Tao
Hoeke, Veronika
Cutsail, George E.
Hammes-Schiffer, Sharon
Klinman, Judith P.
Hoffman, Brian M.
(13)C ENDOR Spectroscopy of Lipoxygenase–Substrate Complexes Reveals the Structural Basis for C–H Activation by Tunneling
title (13)C ENDOR Spectroscopy of Lipoxygenase–Substrate Complexes Reveals the Structural Basis for C–H Activation by Tunneling
title_full (13)C ENDOR Spectroscopy of Lipoxygenase–Substrate Complexes Reveals the Structural Basis for C–H Activation by Tunneling
title_fullStr (13)C ENDOR Spectroscopy of Lipoxygenase–Substrate Complexes Reveals the Structural Basis for C–H Activation by Tunneling
title_full_unstemmed (13)C ENDOR Spectroscopy of Lipoxygenase–Substrate Complexes Reveals the Structural Basis for C–H Activation by Tunneling
title_short (13)C ENDOR Spectroscopy of Lipoxygenase–Substrate Complexes Reveals the Structural Basis for C–H Activation by Tunneling
title_sort (13)c endor spectroscopy of lipoxygenase–substrate complexes reveals the structural basis for c–h activation by tunneling
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5322796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28121140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b11856
work_keys_str_mv AT horitanimasaki 13cendorspectroscopyoflipoxygenasesubstratecomplexesrevealsthestructuralbasisforchactivationbytunneling
AT offenbacheradamr 13cendorspectroscopyoflipoxygenasesubstratecomplexesrevealsthestructuralbasisforchactivationbytunneling
AT carrcodyamarcus 13cendorspectroscopyoflipoxygenasesubstratecomplexesrevealsthestructuralbasisforchactivationbytunneling
AT yutao 13cendorspectroscopyoflipoxygenasesubstratecomplexesrevealsthestructuralbasisforchactivationbytunneling
AT hoekeveronika 13cendorspectroscopyoflipoxygenasesubstratecomplexesrevealsthestructuralbasisforchactivationbytunneling
AT cutsailgeorgee 13cendorspectroscopyoflipoxygenasesubstratecomplexesrevealsthestructuralbasisforchactivationbytunneling
AT hammesschiffersharon 13cendorspectroscopyoflipoxygenasesubstratecomplexesrevealsthestructuralbasisforchactivationbytunneling
AT klinmanjudithp 13cendorspectroscopyoflipoxygenasesubstratecomplexesrevealsthestructuralbasisforchactivationbytunneling
AT hoffmanbrianm 13cendorspectroscopyoflipoxygenasesubstratecomplexesrevealsthestructuralbasisforchactivationbytunneling