Cargando…
Resident Development via Progress Testing and Test-Marking: An Innovation and Program Evaluation
INTRODUCTION: Since 2008, the McMaster University Royal College Emergency Medicine residency training program has run practice Short Answer Question (SAQ) examinations to help residents test their knowledge and gain practice in answering exam-style questions. However, marking this type of SAQ exam i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5323028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265528 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.992 |
_version_ | 1782509957916131328 |
---|---|
author | Schiff, Karen Williams, D. Josh Pardhan, Alim Preyra, Ian Li, Shelly-Anne Chan, Teresa |
author_facet | Schiff, Karen Williams, D. Josh Pardhan, Alim Preyra, Ian Li, Shelly-Anne Chan, Teresa |
author_sort | Schiff, Karen |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Since 2008, the McMaster University Royal College Emergency Medicine residency training program has run practice Short Answer Question (SAQ) examinations to help residents test their knowledge and gain practice in answering exam-style questions. However, marking this type of SAQ exam is time-consuming. METHODS: To help address this problem, we require that senior residents help mark at least one exam per year alongside faculty members. Examinees’ identities are kept anonymous by assigning a random number to each resident, which is only decoded after marking. Aggregation of marks is done by faculty only. The senior residents and faculty members all share sequential marking of each question. Each question is reviewed, and exemplar “best practice” answers are discussed. As novel/unusual answers appear, instantaneous fact-checking (via textbooks, or the internet) and discussions occur allowing for real-time modification to the answer keys as needed. RESULTS: A total of 22 out of 37 residents (post graduate year 1 to post graduate year 5 (PGY1 to PGY5)) participated in a recent program evaluation focus group. This evaluation showed that residents feel quite positive about this process. With the anonymization process, residents do not object to their colleagues seeing and marking their answers. Senior residents have found this process informative and have felt that this process helps them gain insight into better “examsmanship.” CONCLUSIONS: Involving residents in marking short-answer exams is acceptable and perceived as useful experience for improving exam-taking skills. More studies of similar innovations would be required to determine to what extent this may be the case. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5323028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53230282017-03-06 Resident Development via Progress Testing and Test-Marking: An Innovation and Program Evaluation Schiff, Karen Williams, D. Josh Pardhan, Alim Preyra, Ian Li, Shelly-Anne Chan, Teresa Cureus Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: Since 2008, the McMaster University Royal College Emergency Medicine residency training program has run practice Short Answer Question (SAQ) examinations to help residents test their knowledge and gain practice in answering exam-style questions. However, marking this type of SAQ exam is time-consuming. METHODS: To help address this problem, we require that senior residents help mark at least one exam per year alongside faculty members. Examinees’ identities are kept anonymous by assigning a random number to each resident, which is only decoded after marking. Aggregation of marks is done by faculty only. The senior residents and faculty members all share sequential marking of each question. Each question is reviewed, and exemplar “best practice” answers are discussed. As novel/unusual answers appear, instantaneous fact-checking (via textbooks, or the internet) and discussions occur allowing for real-time modification to the answer keys as needed. RESULTS: A total of 22 out of 37 residents (post graduate year 1 to post graduate year 5 (PGY1 to PGY5)) participated in a recent program evaluation focus group. This evaluation showed that residents feel quite positive about this process. With the anonymization process, residents do not object to their colleagues seeing and marking their answers. Senior residents have found this process informative and have felt that this process helps them gain insight into better “examsmanship.” CONCLUSIONS: Involving residents in marking short-answer exams is acceptable and perceived as useful experience for improving exam-taking skills. More studies of similar innovations would be required to determine to what extent this may be the case. Cureus 2017-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5323028/ /pubmed/28265528 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.992 Text en Copyright © 2017, Schiff et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Schiff, Karen Williams, D. Josh Pardhan, Alim Preyra, Ian Li, Shelly-Anne Chan, Teresa Resident Development via Progress Testing and Test-Marking: An Innovation and Program Evaluation |
title | Resident Development via Progress Testing and Test-Marking: An Innovation and Program Evaluation |
title_full | Resident Development via Progress Testing and Test-Marking: An Innovation and Program Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Resident Development via Progress Testing and Test-Marking: An Innovation and Program Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Resident Development via Progress Testing and Test-Marking: An Innovation and Program Evaluation |
title_short | Resident Development via Progress Testing and Test-Marking: An Innovation and Program Evaluation |
title_sort | resident development via progress testing and test-marking: an innovation and program evaluation |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5323028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265528 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.992 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schiffkaren residentdevelopmentviaprogresstestingandtestmarkinganinnovationandprogramevaluation AT williamsdjosh residentdevelopmentviaprogresstestingandtestmarkinganinnovationandprogramevaluation AT pardhanalim residentdevelopmentviaprogresstestingandtestmarkinganinnovationandprogramevaluation AT preyraian residentdevelopmentviaprogresstestingandtestmarkinganinnovationandprogramevaluation AT lishellyanne residentdevelopmentviaprogresstestingandtestmarkinganinnovationandprogramevaluation AT chanteresa residentdevelopmentviaprogresstestingandtestmarkinganinnovationandprogramevaluation |