Cargando…
Proteomics insights into DNA damage response and translating this knowledge to clinical strategies
Genomic instability is a critical driver in the process of cancer formation. At the same time, inducing DNA damage by irradiation or genotoxic compounds constitutes a key therapeutic strategy to kill fast‐dividing cancer cells. Sensing of DNA lesions initiates a complex set of signalling pathways, c...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27682984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201600018 |
_version_ | 1782511716978917376 |
---|---|
author | von Stechow, Louise Olsen, Jesper V. |
author_facet | von Stechow, Louise Olsen, Jesper V. |
author_sort | von Stechow, Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genomic instability is a critical driver in the process of cancer formation. At the same time, inducing DNA damage by irradiation or genotoxic compounds constitutes a key therapeutic strategy to kill fast‐dividing cancer cells. Sensing of DNA lesions initiates a complex set of signalling pathways, collectively known as the DNA damage response (DDR). Deciphering DDR signalling pathways with high‐throughput technologies could provide insights into oncogenic transformation, metastasis formation and therapy responses, and could build a basis for better therapeutic interventions in cancer treatment. Mass spectrometry (MS)‐based proteomics emerged as a method of choice for global studies of proteins and their posttranslational modifications (PTMs). MS‐based studies of the DDR have aided in delineating DNA damage‐induced signalling responses. Those studies identified changes in abundance, interactions and modification of proteins in the context of genotoxic stress. Here we review ground‐breaking MS‐based proteomics studies, which analysed changes in protein abundance, protein‐protein and protein‐DNA interactions, phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitylation, SUMOylation and Poly(ADP‐ribose)ylation (PARylation) in the DDR. Finally, we provide an outlook on how proteomics studies of the DDR could aid clinical developments on multiple levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5333460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53334602017-03-16 Proteomics insights into DNA damage response and translating this knowledge to clinical strategies von Stechow, Louise Olsen, Jesper V. Proteomics Biomedicine Genomic instability is a critical driver in the process of cancer formation. At the same time, inducing DNA damage by irradiation or genotoxic compounds constitutes a key therapeutic strategy to kill fast‐dividing cancer cells. Sensing of DNA lesions initiates a complex set of signalling pathways, collectively known as the DNA damage response (DDR). Deciphering DDR signalling pathways with high‐throughput technologies could provide insights into oncogenic transformation, metastasis formation and therapy responses, and could build a basis for better therapeutic interventions in cancer treatment. Mass spectrometry (MS)‐based proteomics emerged as a method of choice for global studies of proteins and their posttranslational modifications (PTMs). MS‐based studies of the DDR have aided in delineating DNA damage‐induced signalling responses. Those studies identified changes in abundance, interactions and modification of proteins in the context of genotoxic stress. Here we review ground‐breaking MS‐based proteomics studies, which analysed changes in protein abundance, protein‐protein and protein‐DNA interactions, phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitylation, SUMOylation and Poly(ADP‐ribose)ylation (PARylation) in the DDR. Finally, we provide an outlook on how proteomics studies of the DDR could aid clinical developments on multiple levels. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-12-12 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5333460/ /pubmed/27682984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201600018 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Proteomics Published by Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Biomedicine von Stechow, Louise Olsen, Jesper V. Proteomics insights into DNA damage response and translating this knowledge to clinical strategies |
title | Proteomics insights into DNA damage response and translating this knowledge to clinical strategies |
title_full | Proteomics insights into DNA damage response and translating this knowledge to clinical strategies |
title_fullStr | Proteomics insights into DNA damage response and translating this knowledge to clinical strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | Proteomics insights into DNA damage response and translating this knowledge to clinical strategies |
title_short | Proteomics insights into DNA damage response and translating this knowledge to clinical strategies |
title_sort | proteomics insights into dna damage response and translating this knowledge to clinical strategies |
topic | Biomedicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27682984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201600018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vonstechowlouise proteomicsinsightsintodnadamageresponseandtranslatingthisknowledgetoclinicalstrategies AT olsenjesperv proteomicsinsightsintodnadamageresponseandtranslatingthisknowledgetoclinicalstrategies |