Cargando…

Knowledge into learning: comparing lecture, e‐learning and self‐study take‐home packet instructional methodologies with nurses

AIM: The aim of this quantitative experimental study was to examine which of three instructional methodologies of traditional lecture, online electronic learning (e‐learning) and self‐study take‐home packets are effective in knowledge acquisition of professional registered nurses. DESIGN: A true exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Soper, Tracey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.73
_version_ 1782512793332744192
author Soper, Tracey
author_facet Soper, Tracey
author_sort Soper, Tracey
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this quantitative experimental study was to examine which of three instructional methodologies of traditional lecture, online electronic learning (e‐learning) and self‐study take‐home packets are effective in knowledge acquisition of professional registered nurses. DESIGN: A true experimental design was conducted to contrast the knowledge acquisition of 87 registered nurses randomly selected. METHODS: A 40‐item Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) true/false test was used to measure knowledge acquisition. Based on 0.05 significance level, the ANOVA test revealed that there was no difference in knowledge acquisition by registered nurses based on which of three learning instructional method they were assigned. It can be concluded that while all of these instructional methods were equally effective in knowledge acquisition, these methods may not be equally cost‐ and time‐effective. RESULTS: The study was able to determine that there were no significant differences in knowledge acquisition of nurses between the three instructional methodologies. The study also found that all groups scored at the acceptable level for certification. It can be concluded that all of these instructional methods were equally effective in knowledge acquisition but are not equally cost‐ and time‐effective. Therefore, hospital educators may wish to formulate policies regarding choice of instructional method that take into account the efficient use of nurses’ time and institutional resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5340166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53401662017-03-10 Knowledge into learning: comparing lecture, e‐learning and self‐study take‐home packet instructional methodologies with nurses Soper, Tracey Nurs Open Research Articles AIM: The aim of this quantitative experimental study was to examine which of three instructional methodologies of traditional lecture, online electronic learning (e‐learning) and self‐study take‐home packets are effective in knowledge acquisition of professional registered nurses. DESIGN: A true experimental design was conducted to contrast the knowledge acquisition of 87 registered nurses randomly selected. METHODS: A 40‐item Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) true/false test was used to measure knowledge acquisition. Based on 0.05 significance level, the ANOVA test revealed that there was no difference in knowledge acquisition by registered nurses based on which of three learning instructional method they were assigned. It can be concluded that while all of these instructional methods were equally effective in knowledge acquisition, these methods may not be equally cost‐ and time‐effective. RESULTS: The study was able to determine that there were no significant differences in knowledge acquisition of nurses between the three instructional methodologies. The study also found that all groups scored at the acceptable level for certification. It can be concluded that all of these instructional methods were equally effective in knowledge acquisition but are not equally cost‐ and time‐effective. Therefore, hospital educators may wish to formulate policies regarding choice of instructional method that take into account the efficient use of nurses’ time and institutional resources. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5340166/ /pubmed/28286663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.73 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Soper, Tracey
Knowledge into learning: comparing lecture, e‐learning and self‐study take‐home packet instructional methodologies with nurses
title Knowledge into learning: comparing lecture, e‐learning and self‐study take‐home packet instructional methodologies with nurses
title_full Knowledge into learning: comparing lecture, e‐learning and self‐study take‐home packet instructional methodologies with nurses
title_fullStr Knowledge into learning: comparing lecture, e‐learning and self‐study take‐home packet instructional methodologies with nurses
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge into learning: comparing lecture, e‐learning and self‐study take‐home packet instructional methodologies with nurses
title_short Knowledge into learning: comparing lecture, e‐learning and self‐study take‐home packet instructional methodologies with nurses
title_sort knowledge into learning: comparing lecture, e‐learning and self‐study take‐home packet instructional methodologies with nurses
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.73
work_keys_str_mv AT sopertracey knowledgeintolearningcomparinglectureelearningandselfstudytakehomepacketinstructionalmethodologieswithnurses