Cargando…

Influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf students’ reading after cochlear implantation

The target of this investigation was to determine the effectiveness of neurofeedback in promoting reading in deaf kids after cochlear implantation. This research was an analytical example of 8 kids (5 sons and three girls) grown 8-14 years old by an IQ of eighty, based on Wechsler exam scheduled on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soltani Kouhbanani, S, Khosrorad, R, Hashemian, M, Nasehnezhad, M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Carol Davila University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316664
_version_ 1782514367496978432
author Soltani Kouhbanani, S
Khosrorad, R
Hashemian, M
Nasehnezhad, M
author_facet Soltani Kouhbanani, S
Khosrorad, R
Hashemian, M
Nasehnezhad, M
author_sort Soltani Kouhbanani, S
collection PubMed
description The target of this investigation was to determine the effectiveness of neurofeedback in promoting reading in deaf kids after cochlear implantation. This research was an analytical example of 8 kids (5 sons and three girls) grown 8-14 years old by an IQ of eighty, based on Wechsler exam scheduled on the student’s list. Next recognizing the students according to specific standards, parents and their kid engaged in the research, which happened in Ava square in Ilam, and, afterward heard the stories about the way they could manage the trade themselves. No past of seizure disorders, epilepsy and brain trauma was recorded. No past of seizure disorders, epilepsy and brain trauma was recorded. The cochlear implant was done in 18 months and highest twenty-four months. The members were randomly split into a test collection and a check collection. The experimental group got neurofeedback therapy for twenty sessions of forty minutes any (3 sessions by week). The means used in this research were a demographic questionnaire (which covered data such as age, degree, and IQ), a reading disorder test, and the neurofeedback devices. The capability to read the neurofeedback collection recorded that the reading problems in the experimental group were lower. Also, the functional groups, relocation, replacement and reverse readings improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5348961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Carol Davila University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53489612017-03-17 Influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf students’ reading after cochlear implantation Soltani Kouhbanani, S Khosrorad, R Hashemian, M Nasehnezhad, M J Med Life Original Articles The target of this investigation was to determine the effectiveness of neurofeedback in promoting reading in deaf kids after cochlear implantation. This research was an analytical example of 8 kids (5 sons and three girls) grown 8-14 years old by an IQ of eighty, based on Wechsler exam scheduled on the student’s list. Next recognizing the students according to specific standards, parents and their kid engaged in the research, which happened in Ava square in Ilam, and, afterward heard the stories about the way they could manage the trade themselves. No past of seizure disorders, epilepsy and brain trauma was recorded. No past of seizure disorders, epilepsy and brain trauma was recorded. The cochlear implant was done in 18 months and highest twenty-four months. The members were randomly split into a test collection and a check collection. The experimental group got neurofeedback therapy for twenty sessions of forty minutes any (3 sessions by week). The means used in this research were a demographic questionnaire (which covered data such as age, degree, and IQ), a reading disorder test, and the neurofeedback devices. The capability to read the neurofeedback collection recorded that the reading problems in the experimental group were lower. Also, the functional groups, relocation, replacement and reverse readings improved. Carol Davila University Press 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC5348961/ /pubmed/28316664 Text en ©Carol Davila University Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Soltani Kouhbanani, S
Khosrorad, R
Hashemian, M
Nasehnezhad, M
Influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf students’ reading after cochlear implantation
title Influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf students’ reading after cochlear implantation
title_full Influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf students’ reading after cochlear implantation
title_fullStr Influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf students’ reading after cochlear implantation
title_full_unstemmed Influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf students’ reading after cochlear implantation
title_short Influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf students’ reading after cochlear implantation
title_sort influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf students’ reading after cochlear implantation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316664
work_keys_str_mv AT soltanikouhbananis influenceofneurofeedbackinimprovingthedeafstudentsreadingaftercochlearimplantation
AT khosroradr influenceofneurofeedbackinimprovingthedeafstudentsreadingaftercochlearimplantation
AT hashemianm influenceofneurofeedbackinimprovingthedeafstudentsreadingaftercochlearimplantation
AT nasehnezhadm influenceofneurofeedbackinimprovingthedeafstudentsreadingaftercochlearimplantation