Cargando…
Influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf students’ reading after cochlear implantation
The target of this investigation was to determine the effectiveness of neurofeedback in promoting reading in deaf kids after cochlear implantation. This research was an analytical example of 8 kids (5 sons and three girls) grown 8-14 years old by an IQ of eighty, based on Wechsler exam scheduled on...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Carol Davila University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316664 |
_version_ | 1782514367496978432 |
---|---|
author | Soltani Kouhbanani, S Khosrorad, R Hashemian, M Nasehnezhad, M |
author_facet | Soltani Kouhbanani, S Khosrorad, R Hashemian, M Nasehnezhad, M |
author_sort | Soltani Kouhbanani, S |
collection | PubMed |
description | The target of this investigation was to determine the effectiveness of neurofeedback in promoting reading in deaf kids after cochlear implantation. This research was an analytical example of 8 kids (5 sons and three girls) grown 8-14 years old by an IQ of eighty, based on Wechsler exam scheduled on the student’s list. Next recognizing the students according to specific standards, parents and their kid engaged in the research, which happened in Ava square in Ilam, and, afterward heard the stories about the way they could manage the trade themselves. No past of seizure disorders, epilepsy and brain trauma was recorded. No past of seizure disorders, epilepsy and brain trauma was recorded. The cochlear implant was done in 18 months and highest twenty-four months. The members were randomly split into a test collection and a check collection. The experimental group got neurofeedback therapy for twenty sessions of forty minutes any (3 sessions by week). The means used in this research were a demographic questionnaire (which covered data such as age, degree, and IQ), a reading disorder test, and the neurofeedback devices. The capability to read the neurofeedback collection recorded that the reading problems in the experimental group were lower. Also, the functional groups, relocation, replacement and reverse readings improved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5348961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Carol Davila University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53489612017-03-17 Influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf students’ reading after cochlear implantation Soltani Kouhbanani, S Khosrorad, R Hashemian, M Nasehnezhad, M J Med Life Original Articles The target of this investigation was to determine the effectiveness of neurofeedback in promoting reading in deaf kids after cochlear implantation. This research was an analytical example of 8 kids (5 sons and three girls) grown 8-14 years old by an IQ of eighty, based on Wechsler exam scheduled on the student’s list. Next recognizing the students according to specific standards, parents and their kid engaged in the research, which happened in Ava square in Ilam, and, afterward heard the stories about the way they could manage the trade themselves. No past of seizure disorders, epilepsy and brain trauma was recorded. No past of seizure disorders, epilepsy and brain trauma was recorded. The cochlear implant was done in 18 months and highest twenty-four months. The members were randomly split into a test collection and a check collection. The experimental group got neurofeedback therapy for twenty sessions of forty minutes any (3 sessions by week). The means used in this research were a demographic questionnaire (which covered data such as age, degree, and IQ), a reading disorder test, and the neurofeedback devices. The capability to read the neurofeedback collection recorded that the reading problems in the experimental group were lower. Also, the functional groups, relocation, replacement and reverse readings improved. Carol Davila University Press 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC5348961/ /pubmed/28316664 Text en ©Carol Davila University Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Soltani Kouhbanani, S Khosrorad, R Hashemian, M Nasehnezhad, M Influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf students’ reading after cochlear implantation |
title | Influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf
students’ reading after cochlear implantation
|
title_full | Influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf
students’ reading after cochlear implantation
|
title_fullStr | Influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf
students’ reading after cochlear implantation
|
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf
students’ reading after cochlear implantation
|
title_short | Influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf
students’ reading after cochlear implantation
|
title_sort | influence of neurofeedback in improving the deaf
students’ reading after cochlear implantation |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316664 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soltanikouhbananis influenceofneurofeedbackinimprovingthedeafstudentsreadingaftercochlearimplantation AT khosroradr influenceofneurofeedbackinimprovingthedeafstudentsreadingaftercochlearimplantation AT hashemianm influenceofneurofeedbackinimprovingthedeafstudentsreadingaftercochlearimplantation AT nasehnezhadm influenceofneurofeedbackinimprovingthedeafstudentsreadingaftercochlearimplantation |