Cargando…

The Patient Feedback Response Framework – Understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback: A qualitative study

Patients are increasingly being asked for feedback about their healthcare experiences. However, healthcare staff often find it difficult to act on this feedback in order to make improvements to services. This paper draws upon notions of legitimacy and readiness to develop a conceptual framework (Pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheard, Laura, Marsh, Claire, O'Hara, Jane, Armitage, Gerry, Wright, John, Lawton, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pergamon 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28189820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.005
_version_ 1782516546260697088
author Sheard, Laura
Marsh, Claire
O'Hara, Jane
Armitage, Gerry
Wright, John
Lawton, Rebecca
author_facet Sheard, Laura
Marsh, Claire
O'Hara, Jane
Armitage, Gerry
Wright, John
Lawton, Rebecca
author_sort Sheard, Laura
collection PubMed
description Patients are increasingly being asked for feedback about their healthcare experiences. However, healthcare staff often find it difficult to act on this feedback in order to make improvements to services. This paper draws upon notions of legitimacy and readiness to develop a conceptual framework (Patient Feedback Response Framework – PFRF) which outlines why staff may find it problematic to respond to patient feedback. A large qualitative study was conducted with 17 ward based teams between 2013 and 2014, across three hospital Trusts in the North of England. This was a process evaluation of a wider study where ward staff were encouraged to make action plans based on patient feedback. We focus on three methods here: i) examination of taped discussion between ward staff during action planning meetings ii) facilitators notes of these meetings iii) telephone interviews with staff focusing on whether action plans had been achieved six months later. Analysis employed an abductive approach. Through the development of the PFRF, we found that making changes based on patient feedback is a complex multi-tiered process and not something that ward staff can simply ‘do’. First, staff must exhibit normative legitimacy – the belief that listening to patients is a worthwhile exercise. Second, structural legitimacy has to be in place – ward teams need adequate autonomy, ownership and resource to enact change. Some ward teams are able to make improvements within their immediate control and environment. Third, for those staff who require interdepartmental co-operation or high level assistance to achieve change, organisational readiness must exist at the level of the hospital otherwise improvement will rarely be enacted. Case studies drawn from our empirical data demonstrate the above. It is only when appropriate levels of individual and organisational capacity to change exist, that patient feedback is likely to be acted upon to improve services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5360173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Pergamon
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53601732017-04-01 The Patient Feedback Response Framework – Understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback: A qualitative study Sheard, Laura Marsh, Claire O'Hara, Jane Armitage, Gerry Wright, John Lawton, Rebecca Soc Sci Med Article Patients are increasingly being asked for feedback about their healthcare experiences. However, healthcare staff often find it difficult to act on this feedback in order to make improvements to services. This paper draws upon notions of legitimacy and readiness to develop a conceptual framework (Patient Feedback Response Framework – PFRF) which outlines why staff may find it problematic to respond to patient feedback. A large qualitative study was conducted with 17 ward based teams between 2013 and 2014, across three hospital Trusts in the North of England. This was a process evaluation of a wider study where ward staff were encouraged to make action plans based on patient feedback. We focus on three methods here: i) examination of taped discussion between ward staff during action planning meetings ii) facilitators notes of these meetings iii) telephone interviews with staff focusing on whether action plans had been achieved six months later. Analysis employed an abductive approach. Through the development of the PFRF, we found that making changes based on patient feedback is a complex multi-tiered process and not something that ward staff can simply ‘do’. First, staff must exhibit normative legitimacy – the belief that listening to patients is a worthwhile exercise. Second, structural legitimacy has to be in place – ward teams need adequate autonomy, ownership and resource to enact change. Some ward teams are able to make improvements within their immediate control and environment. Third, for those staff who require interdepartmental co-operation or high level assistance to achieve change, organisational readiness must exist at the level of the hospital otherwise improvement will rarely be enacted. Case studies drawn from our empirical data demonstrate the above. It is only when appropriate levels of individual and organisational capacity to change exist, that patient feedback is likely to be acted upon to improve services. Pergamon 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5360173/ /pubmed/28189820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.005 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sheard, Laura
Marsh, Claire
O'Hara, Jane
Armitage, Gerry
Wright, John
Lawton, Rebecca
The Patient Feedback Response Framework – Understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback: A qualitative study
title The Patient Feedback Response Framework – Understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback: A qualitative study
title_full The Patient Feedback Response Framework – Understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback: A qualitative study
title_fullStr The Patient Feedback Response Framework – Understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback: A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed The Patient Feedback Response Framework – Understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback: A qualitative study
title_short The Patient Feedback Response Framework – Understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback: A qualitative study
title_sort patient feedback response framework – understanding why uk hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback: a qualitative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28189820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.005
work_keys_str_mv AT sheardlaura thepatientfeedbackresponseframeworkunderstandingwhyukhospitalstafffinditdifficulttomakeimprovementsbasedonpatientfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT marshclaire thepatientfeedbackresponseframeworkunderstandingwhyukhospitalstafffinditdifficulttomakeimprovementsbasedonpatientfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT oharajane thepatientfeedbackresponseframeworkunderstandingwhyukhospitalstafffinditdifficulttomakeimprovementsbasedonpatientfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT armitagegerry thepatientfeedbackresponseframeworkunderstandingwhyukhospitalstafffinditdifficulttomakeimprovementsbasedonpatientfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT wrightjohn thepatientfeedbackresponseframeworkunderstandingwhyukhospitalstafffinditdifficulttomakeimprovementsbasedonpatientfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT lawtonrebecca thepatientfeedbackresponseframeworkunderstandingwhyukhospitalstafffinditdifficulttomakeimprovementsbasedonpatientfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT sheardlaura patientfeedbackresponseframeworkunderstandingwhyukhospitalstafffinditdifficulttomakeimprovementsbasedonpatientfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT marshclaire patientfeedbackresponseframeworkunderstandingwhyukhospitalstafffinditdifficulttomakeimprovementsbasedonpatientfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT oharajane patientfeedbackresponseframeworkunderstandingwhyukhospitalstafffinditdifficulttomakeimprovementsbasedonpatientfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT armitagegerry patientfeedbackresponseframeworkunderstandingwhyukhospitalstafffinditdifficulttomakeimprovementsbasedonpatientfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT wrightjohn patientfeedbackresponseframeworkunderstandingwhyukhospitalstafffinditdifficulttomakeimprovementsbasedonpatientfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT lawtonrebecca patientfeedbackresponseframeworkunderstandingwhyukhospitalstafffinditdifficulttomakeimprovementsbasedonpatientfeedbackaqualitativestudy