Cargando…

Applicability of predictive toxicology methods for monoclonal antibody therapeutics: status Quo and scope

Biopharmaceuticals, monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapeutics in particular, have positively impacted millions of lives. MAbs and related therapeutics are highly desirable from a biopharmaceutical perspective as they are highly target specific and well tolerated within the human system. Neverthel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kizhedath, Arathi, Wilkinson, Simon, Glassey, Jarka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27766364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-016-1876-7
_version_ 1782517292546916352
author Kizhedath, Arathi
Wilkinson, Simon
Glassey, Jarka
author_facet Kizhedath, Arathi
Wilkinson, Simon
Glassey, Jarka
author_sort Kizhedath, Arathi
collection PubMed
description Biopharmaceuticals, monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapeutics in particular, have positively impacted millions of lives. MAbs and related therapeutics are highly desirable from a biopharmaceutical perspective as they are highly target specific and well tolerated within the human system. Nevertheless, several mAbs have been discontinued or withdrawn based either on their inability to demonstrate efficacy and/or due to adverse effects. Approved monoclonal antibodies and derived therapeutics have been associated with adverse effects such as immunogenicity, cytokine release syndrome, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, intravascular haemolysis, cardiac arrhythmias, abnormal liver function, gastrointestinal perforation, bronchospasm, intraocular inflammation, urticaria, nephritis, neuropathy, birth defects, fever and cough to name a few. The advances made in this field are also impeded by a lack of progress in bioprocess development strategies as well as increasing costs owing to attrition, wherein the lack of efficacy and safety accounts for nearly 60 % of all factors contributing to attrition. This reiterates the need for smarter preclinical development using quality by design-based approaches encompassing carefully designed predictive models during early stages of drug development. Different in vitro and in silico methods are extensively used for predicting biological activity as well as toxicity during small molecule drug development; however, their full potential has not been utilized for biological drug development. The scope of in vitro and in silico tools in early developmental stages of monoclonal antibody-based therapeutics production and how it contributes to lower attrition rates leading to faster development of potential drug candidates has been evaluated. The applicability of computational toxicology approaches in this context as well as the pitfalls and promises of extending such techniques to biopharmaceutical development has been highlighted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00204-016-1876-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5364268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53642682017-04-07 Applicability of predictive toxicology methods for monoclonal antibody therapeutics: status Quo and scope Kizhedath, Arathi Wilkinson, Simon Glassey, Jarka Arch Toxicol Review Article Biopharmaceuticals, monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapeutics in particular, have positively impacted millions of lives. MAbs and related therapeutics are highly desirable from a biopharmaceutical perspective as they are highly target specific and well tolerated within the human system. Nevertheless, several mAbs have been discontinued or withdrawn based either on their inability to demonstrate efficacy and/or due to adverse effects. Approved monoclonal antibodies and derived therapeutics have been associated with adverse effects such as immunogenicity, cytokine release syndrome, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, intravascular haemolysis, cardiac arrhythmias, abnormal liver function, gastrointestinal perforation, bronchospasm, intraocular inflammation, urticaria, nephritis, neuropathy, birth defects, fever and cough to name a few. The advances made in this field are also impeded by a lack of progress in bioprocess development strategies as well as increasing costs owing to attrition, wherein the lack of efficacy and safety accounts for nearly 60 % of all factors contributing to attrition. This reiterates the need for smarter preclinical development using quality by design-based approaches encompassing carefully designed predictive models during early stages of drug development. Different in vitro and in silico methods are extensively used for predicting biological activity as well as toxicity during small molecule drug development; however, their full potential has not been utilized for biological drug development. The scope of in vitro and in silico tools in early developmental stages of monoclonal antibody-based therapeutics production and how it contributes to lower attrition rates leading to faster development of potential drug candidates has been evaluated. The applicability of computational toxicology approaches in this context as well as the pitfalls and promises of extending such techniques to biopharmaceutical development has been highlighted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00204-016-1876-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-10-20 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5364268/ /pubmed/27766364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-016-1876-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Kizhedath, Arathi
Wilkinson, Simon
Glassey, Jarka
Applicability of predictive toxicology methods for monoclonal antibody therapeutics: status Quo and scope
title Applicability of predictive toxicology methods for monoclonal antibody therapeutics: status Quo and scope
title_full Applicability of predictive toxicology methods for monoclonal antibody therapeutics: status Quo and scope
title_fullStr Applicability of predictive toxicology methods for monoclonal antibody therapeutics: status Quo and scope
title_full_unstemmed Applicability of predictive toxicology methods for monoclonal antibody therapeutics: status Quo and scope
title_short Applicability of predictive toxicology methods for monoclonal antibody therapeutics: status Quo and scope
title_sort applicability of predictive toxicology methods for monoclonal antibody therapeutics: status quo and scope
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27766364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-016-1876-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kizhedatharathi applicabilityofpredictivetoxicologymethodsformonoclonalantibodytherapeuticsstatusquoandscope
AT wilkinsonsimon applicabilityofpredictivetoxicologymethodsformonoclonalantibodytherapeuticsstatusquoandscope
AT glasseyjarka applicabilityofpredictivetoxicologymethodsformonoclonalantibodytherapeuticsstatusquoandscope