Cargando…

Does social distinction contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in diet: the case of ‘superfoods’ consumption

BACKGROUND: The key mechanisms underlying socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intake are still poorly understood, hampering the development of interventions. An important, but sparsely mentioned mechanism is that of ‘social distinction’, whereby those in a higher socioeconomic position adopt dieta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oude Groeniger, Joost, van Lenthe, Frank J., Beenackers, Mariëlle A., Kamphuis, Carlijn B. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5369222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28347301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0495-x
_version_ 1782518090407346176
author Oude Groeniger, Joost
van Lenthe, Frank J.
Beenackers, Mariëlle A.
Kamphuis, Carlijn B. M.
author_facet Oude Groeniger, Joost
van Lenthe, Frank J.
Beenackers, Mariëlle A.
Kamphuis, Carlijn B. M.
author_sort Oude Groeniger, Joost
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The key mechanisms underlying socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intake are still poorly understood, hampering the development of interventions. An important, but sparsely mentioned mechanism is that of ‘social distinction’, whereby those in a higher socioeconomic position adopt dietary patterns by which they can distinguish themselves from lower socioeconomic groups. We investigated the importance of distinction as a mechanism, by testing the socioeconomic gradient in the consumption of so-called ‘superfoods’ and the contribution of a well-established indicator of distinction, cultural participation. METHODS: Data from participants (25–75 years) of the 2014 survey of the Dutch population-based GLOBE study were used (N = 2812). Multivariable regression models were used to analyse the association between education, income and cultural participation (e.g. visits to museums, opera, theatre, concerts) and the consumption of superfoods (spelt, quinoa and goji berries, chia seeds or wheatgrass). RESULTS: The consumption of superfoods is far more prevalent among higher socioeconomic groups. Adjusting for cultural participation strongly attenuated the educational and income gradient in superfoods consumption, whereas cultural participation remained strongly associated with superfoods consumption. Those in the highest quintile of cultural participation reported the highest consumption of spelt products (OR = 2.97, 95% CI = 2.10;4.18), quinoa (OR = 3.50, 95% CI = 2.12;5.79) and goji berries, chia seeds or wheatgrass (OR = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.73;4.17). CONCLUSIONS: The associations between socioeconomic position and the consumption of ‘superfoods’ seem to be partially driven by a process of social distinction. These findings suggest that distinction may be an important, but currently neglected mechanism in generating socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intake. It deserves a more prominent role in interventions to reduce these inequalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5369222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53692222017-03-30 Does social distinction contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in diet: the case of ‘superfoods’ consumption Oude Groeniger, Joost van Lenthe, Frank J. Beenackers, Mariëlle A. Kamphuis, Carlijn B. M. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: The key mechanisms underlying socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intake are still poorly understood, hampering the development of interventions. An important, but sparsely mentioned mechanism is that of ‘social distinction’, whereby those in a higher socioeconomic position adopt dietary patterns by which they can distinguish themselves from lower socioeconomic groups. We investigated the importance of distinction as a mechanism, by testing the socioeconomic gradient in the consumption of so-called ‘superfoods’ and the contribution of a well-established indicator of distinction, cultural participation. METHODS: Data from participants (25–75 years) of the 2014 survey of the Dutch population-based GLOBE study were used (N = 2812). Multivariable regression models were used to analyse the association between education, income and cultural participation (e.g. visits to museums, opera, theatre, concerts) and the consumption of superfoods (spelt, quinoa and goji berries, chia seeds or wheatgrass). RESULTS: The consumption of superfoods is far more prevalent among higher socioeconomic groups. Adjusting for cultural participation strongly attenuated the educational and income gradient in superfoods consumption, whereas cultural participation remained strongly associated with superfoods consumption. Those in the highest quintile of cultural participation reported the highest consumption of spelt products (OR = 2.97, 95% CI = 2.10;4.18), quinoa (OR = 3.50, 95% CI = 2.12;5.79) and goji berries, chia seeds or wheatgrass (OR = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.73;4.17). CONCLUSIONS: The associations between socioeconomic position and the consumption of ‘superfoods’ seem to be partially driven by a process of social distinction. These findings suggest that distinction may be an important, but currently neglected mechanism in generating socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intake. It deserves a more prominent role in interventions to reduce these inequalities. BioMed Central 2017-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5369222/ /pubmed/28347301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0495-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Oude Groeniger, Joost
van Lenthe, Frank J.
Beenackers, Mariëlle A.
Kamphuis, Carlijn B. M.
Does social distinction contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in diet: the case of ‘superfoods’ consumption
title Does social distinction contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in diet: the case of ‘superfoods’ consumption
title_full Does social distinction contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in diet: the case of ‘superfoods’ consumption
title_fullStr Does social distinction contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in diet: the case of ‘superfoods’ consumption
title_full_unstemmed Does social distinction contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in diet: the case of ‘superfoods’ consumption
title_short Does social distinction contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in diet: the case of ‘superfoods’ consumption
title_sort does social distinction contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in diet: the case of ‘superfoods’ consumption
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5369222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28347301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0495-x
work_keys_str_mv AT oudegroenigerjoost doessocialdistinctioncontributetosocioeconomicinequalitiesindietthecaseofsuperfoodsconsumption
AT vanlenthefrankj doessocialdistinctioncontributetosocioeconomicinequalitiesindietthecaseofsuperfoodsconsumption
AT beenackersmariellea doessocialdistinctioncontributetosocioeconomicinequalitiesindietthecaseofsuperfoodsconsumption
AT kamphuiscarlijnbm doessocialdistinctioncontributetosocioeconomicinequalitiesindietthecaseofsuperfoodsconsumption