Cargando…

House Staff Communication Training and Patient Experience Scores

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether communication training for house staff via role-playing exercises (1) is well received and (2) improves patient experience scores in house staff clinics. METHODS: We conducted a pre–post study in which the house staff for 3 adult hospital departments participated in comm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oladeru, Oladoyin A, Hamadu, Musleehat, Cleary, Paul D, Hittelman, Adam B, Bulsara, Ketan R, Laurans, Maxwell SH, DiCapua, Daniel B, Marcolini, Evie G, Moeller, Jeremy J, Khokhar, Babar, Hodge, Jeannette W, Fortin, Auguste H, Hafler, Janet P, Bennick, Michael C, Hwang, David Y
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28393108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373517694533
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To assess whether communication training for house staff via role-playing exercises (1) is well received and (2) improves patient experience scores in house staff clinics. METHODS: We conducted a pre–post study in which the house staff for 3 adult hospital departments participated in communication training led by trained faculty in small groups. Sessions centered on a published 5-step strategy for opening patient-centered interviews using department-specific role-playing exercises. House staff completed posttraining questionnaires. For 1 month prior to and 1 month following the training, patients in the house staff clinics completed surveys with Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CG-CAHPS) questions regarding physician communication, immediately following clinic visits. Preintervention and postintervention results for top-box scores were compared. RESULTS: Forty-four of a possible 45 house staff (97.8%) participated, with 31 (70.5%) indicating that the role-playing exercise increased their perception of the 5-step strategy. No differences in patient responses to CG-CAHPS questions were seen when comparing 63 preintervention surveys to 77 postintervention surveys. CONCLUSION: Demonstrating an improvement in standard patient experience surveys in resident clinics may require ongoing communication coaching and investigation of the “hidden curriculum” of training.