Cargando…

A comparative study: do “clickers” increase student engagement in multidisciplinary clinical microbiology teaching?

BACKGROUND: Audience response devices, or “clickers”, have been used in the education of future healthcare professionals for several years with varying success. They have been reported to improve the learning experience by promoting engagement and knowledge retention. In 2014, our department evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stevens, Niall T., McDermott, Hélène, Boland, Fiona, Pawlikowska, Teresa, Humphreys, Hilary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28390400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0906-3
_version_ 1782520523604885504
author Stevens, Niall T.
McDermott, Hélène
Boland, Fiona
Pawlikowska, Teresa
Humphreys, Hilary
author_facet Stevens, Niall T.
McDermott, Hélène
Boland, Fiona
Pawlikowska, Teresa
Humphreys, Hilary
author_sort Stevens, Niall T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Audience response devices, or “clickers”, have been used in the education of future healthcare professionals for several years with varying success. They have been reported to improve the learning experience by promoting engagement and knowledge retention. In 2014, our department evaluated the use of “clickers” in a newly introduced multidisciplinary approach to teaching large groups of third year medical students clinical cases developed around a microbiology theme. METHODS: Six multidisciplinary teaching sessions covering community-acquired pneumonia, tuberculosis, infective endocarditis, peritonitis, bloodstream infection with pyelonephritis and bacterial meningitis were included in the study. Three involved the use of the “clickers” and three did not. Consenting undergraduate students attended the designated classes and afterwards answered a short online quiz relating to the session. Students also answered a short questionnaire about the “clickers” to gauge their attitudes on the use of these devices. RESULTS: Of 310 students, 294 (94.8%) agreed to participate in the study. Interestingly, the grades of online quizzes after a session where a “clicker” was used were slightly lower. Looking only at the grades of students who engaged completely with the process (n = 19), there was no statistical difference to suggest that the devices had a positive or negative impact on knowledge retention. However, student attitudes to using the devices were positive overall. Fifty-five percent strongly agreed and 27% agreed that teaching sessions where the “clickers” were used were more engaging. Thirty-four percent strongly agreed and 36% agreed that the “clickers” made important concepts more memorable and 54% felt the device enhanced their understanding of the topic being covered. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, it appears that “clickers” help in improving student engagement in large classroom environments, enhance the learning experience, and are received positively by medical students but their impact on knowledge retention is variable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5385002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53850022017-04-12 A comparative study: do “clickers” increase student engagement in multidisciplinary clinical microbiology teaching? Stevens, Niall T. McDermott, Hélène Boland, Fiona Pawlikowska, Teresa Humphreys, Hilary BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Audience response devices, or “clickers”, have been used in the education of future healthcare professionals for several years with varying success. They have been reported to improve the learning experience by promoting engagement and knowledge retention. In 2014, our department evaluated the use of “clickers” in a newly introduced multidisciplinary approach to teaching large groups of third year medical students clinical cases developed around a microbiology theme. METHODS: Six multidisciplinary teaching sessions covering community-acquired pneumonia, tuberculosis, infective endocarditis, peritonitis, bloodstream infection with pyelonephritis and bacterial meningitis were included in the study. Three involved the use of the “clickers” and three did not. Consenting undergraduate students attended the designated classes and afterwards answered a short online quiz relating to the session. Students also answered a short questionnaire about the “clickers” to gauge their attitudes on the use of these devices. RESULTS: Of 310 students, 294 (94.8%) agreed to participate in the study. Interestingly, the grades of online quizzes after a session where a “clicker” was used were slightly lower. Looking only at the grades of students who engaged completely with the process (n = 19), there was no statistical difference to suggest that the devices had a positive or negative impact on knowledge retention. However, student attitudes to using the devices were positive overall. Fifty-five percent strongly agreed and 27% agreed that teaching sessions where the “clickers” were used were more engaging. Thirty-four percent strongly agreed and 36% agreed that the “clickers” made important concepts more memorable and 54% felt the device enhanced their understanding of the topic being covered. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, it appears that “clickers” help in improving student engagement in large classroom environments, enhance the learning experience, and are received positively by medical students but their impact on knowledge retention is variable. BioMed Central 2017-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5385002/ /pubmed/28390400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0906-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stevens, Niall T.
McDermott, Hélène
Boland, Fiona
Pawlikowska, Teresa
Humphreys, Hilary
A comparative study: do “clickers” increase student engagement in multidisciplinary clinical microbiology teaching?
title A comparative study: do “clickers” increase student engagement in multidisciplinary clinical microbiology teaching?
title_full A comparative study: do “clickers” increase student engagement in multidisciplinary clinical microbiology teaching?
title_fullStr A comparative study: do “clickers” increase student engagement in multidisciplinary clinical microbiology teaching?
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study: do “clickers” increase student engagement in multidisciplinary clinical microbiology teaching?
title_short A comparative study: do “clickers” increase student engagement in multidisciplinary clinical microbiology teaching?
title_sort comparative study: do “clickers” increase student engagement in multidisciplinary clinical microbiology teaching?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28390400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0906-3
work_keys_str_mv AT stevensniallt acomparativestudydoclickersincreasestudentengagementinmultidisciplinaryclinicalmicrobiologyteaching
AT mcdermotthelene acomparativestudydoclickersincreasestudentengagementinmultidisciplinaryclinicalmicrobiologyteaching
AT bolandfiona acomparativestudydoclickersincreasestudentengagementinmultidisciplinaryclinicalmicrobiologyteaching
AT pawlikowskateresa acomparativestudydoclickersincreasestudentengagementinmultidisciplinaryclinicalmicrobiologyteaching
AT humphreyshilary acomparativestudydoclickersincreasestudentengagementinmultidisciplinaryclinicalmicrobiologyteaching
AT stevensniallt comparativestudydoclickersincreasestudentengagementinmultidisciplinaryclinicalmicrobiologyteaching
AT mcdermotthelene comparativestudydoclickersincreasestudentengagementinmultidisciplinaryclinicalmicrobiologyteaching
AT bolandfiona comparativestudydoclickersincreasestudentengagementinmultidisciplinaryclinicalmicrobiologyteaching
AT pawlikowskateresa comparativestudydoclickersincreasestudentengagementinmultidisciplinaryclinicalmicrobiologyteaching
AT humphreyshilary comparativestudydoclickersincreasestudentengagementinmultidisciplinaryclinicalmicrobiologyteaching