Cargando…
Proximity to AGCT sequences dictates MMR-independent versus MMR-dependent mechanisms for AID-induced mutation via UNG2
AID deaminates C to U in either strand of Ig genes, exclusively producing C:G/G:C to T:A/A:T transition mutations if U is left unrepaired. Error-prone processing by UNG2 or mismatch repair diversifies mutation, predominantly at C:G or A:T base pairs, respectively. Here, we show that transversions at...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5389528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28039326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1300 |
_version_ | 1782521285113282560 |
---|---|
author | Thientosapol, Eddy Sanchai Sharbeen, George Lau, K.K. Edwin Bosnjak, Daniel Durack, Timothy Stevanovski, Igor Weninger, Wolfgang Jolly, Christopher J. |
author_facet | Thientosapol, Eddy Sanchai Sharbeen, George Lau, K.K. Edwin Bosnjak, Daniel Durack, Timothy Stevanovski, Igor Weninger, Wolfgang Jolly, Christopher J. |
author_sort | Thientosapol, Eddy Sanchai |
collection | PubMed |
description | AID deaminates C to U in either strand of Ig genes, exclusively producing C:G/G:C to T:A/A:T transition mutations if U is left unrepaired. Error-prone processing by UNG2 or mismatch repair diversifies mutation, predominantly at C:G or A:T base pairs, respectively. Here, we show that transversions at C:G base pairs occur by two distinct processing pathways that are dictated by sequence context. Within and near AGCT mutation hotspots, transversion mutation at C:G was driven by UNG2 without requirement for mismatch repair. Deaminations in AGCT were refractive both to processing by UNG2 and to high-fidelity base excision repair (BER) downstream of UNG2, regardless of mismatch repair activity. We propose that AGCT sequences resist faithful BER because they bind BER-inhibitory protein(s) and/or because hemi-deaminated AGCT motifs innately form a BER-resistant DNA structure. Distal to AGCT sequences, transversions at G were largely co-dependent on UNG2 and mismatch repair. We propose that AGCT-distal transversions are produced when apyrimidinic sites are exposed in mismatch excision patches, because completion of mismatch repair would require bypass of these sites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5389528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53895282017-04-24 Proximity to AGCT sequences dictates MMR-independent versus MMR-dependent mechanisms for AID-induced mutation via UNG2 Thientosapol, Eddy Sanchai Sharbeen, George Lau, K.K. Edwin Bosnjak, Daniel Durack, Timothy Stevanovski, Igor Weninger, Wolfgang Jolly, Christopher J. Nucleic Acids Res Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication AID deaminates C to U in either strand of Ig genes, exclusively producing C:G/G:C to T:A/A:T transition mutations if U is left unrepaired. Error-prone processing by UNG2 or mismatch repair diversifies mutation, predominantly at C:G or A:T base pairs, respectively. Here, we show that transversions at C:G base pairs occur by two distinct processing pathways that are dictated by sequence context. Within and near AGCT mutation hotspots, transversion mutation at C:G was driven by UNG2 without requirement for mismatch repair. Deaminations in AGCT were refractive both to processing by UNG2 and to high-fidelity base excision repair (BER) downstream of UNG2, regardless of mismatch repair activity. We propose that AGCT sequences resist faithful BER because they bind BER-inhibitory protein(s) and/or because hemi-deaminated AGCT motifs innately form a BER-resistant DNA structure. Distal to AGCT sequences, transversions at G were largely co-dependent on UNG2 and mismatch repair. We propose that AGCT-distal transversions are produced when apyrimidinic sites are exposed in mismatch excision patches, because completion of mismatch repair would require bypass of these sites. Oxford University Press 2017-04-07 2016-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5389528/ /pubmed/28039326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1300 Text en © The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication Thientosapol, Eddy Sanchai Sharbeen, George Lau, K.K. Edwin Bosnjak, Daniel Durack, Timothy Stevanovski, Igor Weninger, Wolfgang Jolly, Christopher J. Proximity to AGCT sequences dictates MMR-independent versus MMR-dependent mechanisms for AID-induced mutation via UNG2 |
title | Proximity to AGCT sequences dictates MMR-independent versus MMR-dependent mechanisms for AID-induced mutation via UNG2 |
title_full | Proximity to AGCT sequences dictates MMR-independent versus MMR-dependent mechanisms for AID-induced mutation via UNG2 |
title_fullStr | Proximity to AGCT sequences dictates MMR-independent versus MMR-dependent mechanisms for AID-induced mutation via UNG2 |
title_full_unstemmed | Proximity to AGCT sequences dictates MMR-independent versus MMR-dependent mechanisms for AID-induced mutation via UNG2 |
title_short | Proximity to AGCT sequences dictates MMR-independent versus MMR-dependent mechanisms for AID-induced mutation via UNG2 |
title_sort | proximity to agct sequences dictates mmr-independent versus mmr-dependent mechanisms for aid-induced mutation via ung2 |
topic | Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5389528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28039326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thientosapoleddysanchai proximitytoagctsequencesdictatesmmrindependentversusmmrdependentmechanismsforaidinducedmutationviaung2 AT sharbeengeorge proximitytoagctsequencesdictatesmmrindependentversusmmrdependentmechanismsforaidinducedmutationviaung2 AT laukkedwin proximitytoagctsequencesdictatesmmrindependentversusmmrdependentmechanismsforaidinducedmutationviaung2 AT bosnjakdaniel proximitytoagctsequencesdictatesmmrindependentversusmmrdependentmechanismsforaidinducedmutationviaung2 AT duracktimothy proximitytoagctsequencesdictatesmmrindependentversusmmrdependentmechanismsforaidinducedmutationviaung2 AT stevanovskiigor proximitytoagctsequencesdictatesmmrindependentversusmmrdependentmechanismsforaidinducedmutationviaung2 AT weningerwolfgang proximitytoagctsequencesdictatesmmrindependentversusmmrdependentmechanismsforaidinducedmutationviaung2 AT jollychristopherj proximitytoagctsequencesdictatesmmrindependentversusmmrdependentmechanismsforaidinducedmutationviaung2 |