Cargando…
Different enhancer classes in Drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3D architecture
Eukaryotic gene expression is regulated by enhancer–promoter interactions but the molecular mechanisms that govern specificity have remained elusive. Genome-wide studies utilizing STARR-seq identified two enhancer classes in Drosophila that interact with different core promoters: housekeeping enhanc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5389536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27899590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1114 |
_version_ | 1782521286894813184 |
---|---|
author | Cubeñas-Potts, Caelin Rowley, M. Jordan Lyu, Xiaowen Li, Ge Lei, Elissa P. Corces, Victor G. |
author_facet | Cubeñas-Potts, Caelin Rowley, M. Jordan Lyu, Xiaowen Li, Ge Lei, Elissa P. Corces, Victor G. |
author_sort | Cubeñas-Potts, Caelin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Eukaryotic gene expression is regulated by enhancer–promoter interactions but the molecular mechanisms that govern specificity have remained elusive. Genome-wide studies utilizing STARR-seq identified two enhancer classes in Drosophila that interact with different core promoters: housekeeping enhancers (hkCP) and developmental enhancers (dCP). We hypothesized that the two enhancer classes are occupied by distinct architectural proteins, affecting their enhancer–promoter contacts. By evaluating ChIP-seq occupancy of architectural proteins, typical enhancer-associated proteins, and histone modifications, we determine that both enhancer classes are enriched for RNA Polymerase II, CBP, and architectural proteins but there are also distinctions. hkCP enhancers contain H3K4me3 and exclusively bind Cap-H2, Chromator, DREF and Z4, whereas dCP enhancers contain H3K4me1 and are more enriched for Rad21 and Fs(1)h-L. Additionally, we map the interactions of each enhancer class utilizing a Hi-C dataset with <1 kb resolution. Results suggest that hkCP enhancers are more likely to form multi-TSS interaction networks and be associated with topologically associating domain (TAD) borders, while dCP enhancers are more often bound to one or two TSSs and are enriched at chromatin loop anchors. The data support a model suggesting that the unique architectural protein occupancy within enhancers is one contributor to enhancer–promoter interaction specificity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5389536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53895362017-04-24 Different enhancer classes in Drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3D architecture Cubeñas-Potts, Caelin Rowley, M. Jordan Lyu, Xiaowen Li, Ge Lei, Elissa P. Corces, Victor G. Nucleic Acids Res Gene regulation, Chromatin and Epigenetics Eukaryotic gene expression is regulated by enhancer–promoter interactions but the molecular mechanisms that govern specificity have remained elusive. Genome-wide studies utilizing STARR-seq identified two enhancer classes in Drosophila that interact with different core promoters: housekeeping enhancers (hkCP) and developmental enhancers (dCP). We hypothesized that the two enhancer classes are occupied by distinct architectural proteins, affecting their enhancer–promoter contacts. By evaluating ChIP-seq occupancy of architectural proteins, typical enhancer-associated proteins, and histone modifications, we determine that both enhancer classes are enriched for RNA Polymerase II, CBP, and architectural proteins but there are also distinctions. hkCP enhancers contain H3K4me3 and exclusively bind Cap-H2, Chromator, DREF and Z4, whereas dCP enhancers contain H3K4me1 and are more enriched for Rad21 and Fs(1)h-L. Additionally, we map the interactions of each enhancer class utilizing a Hi-C dataset with <1 kb resolution. Results suggest that hkCP enhancers are more likely to form multi-TSS interaction networks and be associated with topologically associating domain (TAD) borders, while dCP enhancers are more often bound to one or two TSSs and are enriched at chromatin loop anchors. The data support a model suggesting that the unique architectural protein occupancy within enhancers is one contributor to enhancer–promoter interaction specificity. Oxford University Press 2017-02-28 2016-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5389536/ /pubmed/27899590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1114 Text en © The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Gene regulation, Chromatin and Epigenetics Cubeñas-Potts, Caelin Rowley, M. Jordan Lyu, Xiaowen Li, Ge Lei, Elissa P. Corces, Victor G. Different enhancer classes in Drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3D architecture |
title | Different enhancer classes in Drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3D architecture |
title_full | Different enhancer classes in Drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3D architecture |
title_fullStr | Different enhancer classes in Drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3D architecture |
title_full_unstemmed | Different enhancer classes in Drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3D architecture |
title_short | Different enhancer classes in Drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3D architecture |
title_sort | different enhancer classes in drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3d architecture |
topic | Gene regulation, Chromatin and Epigenetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5389536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27899590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cubenaspottscaelin differentenhancerclassesindrosophilabinddistinctarchitecturalproteinsandmediateuniquechromatininteractionsand3darchitecture AT rowleymjordan differentenhancerclassesindrosophilabinddistinctarchitecturalproteinsandmediateuniquechromatininteractionsand3darchitecture AT lyuxiaowen differentenhancerclassesindrosophilabinddistinctarchitecturalproteinsandmediateuniquechromatininteractionsand3darchitecture AT lige differentenhancerclassesindrosophilabinddistinctarchitecturalproteinsandmediateuniquechromatininteractionsand3darchitecture AT leielissap differentenhancerclassesindrosophilabinddistinctarchitecturalproteinsandmediateuniquechromatininteractionsand3darchitecture AT corcesvictorg differentenhancerclassesindrosophilabinddistinctarchitecturalproteinsandmediateuniquechromatininteractionsand3darchitecture |