Cargando…

Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners

Sweetness is one of the 5 prototypical tastes and is activated by sugars and non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS). The aim of this study was to investigate measures of sweet taste function [detection threshold (DT), recognition threshold (RT), and suprathreshold intensity ratings] across multiple sweetene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Low, Julia Y.Q., McBride, Robert L., Lacy, Kathleen E., Keast, Russell S.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5390504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27765786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjw109
_version_ 1782521473508835328
author Low, Julia Y.Q.
McBride, Robert L.
Lacy, Kathleen E.
Keast, Russell S.J.
author_facet Low, Julia Y.Q.
McBride, Robert L.
Lacy, Kathleen E.
Keast, Russell S.J.
author_sort Low, Julia Y.Q.
collection PubMed
description Sweetness is one of the 5 prototypical tastes and is activated by sugars and non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS). The aim of this study was to investigate measures of sweet taste function [detection threshold (DT), recognition threshold (RT), and suprathreshold intensity ratings] across multiple sweeteners. Sixty participants, 18–52 years of age (mean age in years = 26, SD = ±7.8), were recruited to participate in the study. DT and RT were collected for caloric sweeteners (glucose, fructose, sucrose, erythritol) and NNS (sucralose, rebaudioside A). Sweetness intensity for all sweeteners was measured using a general Labeled Magnitude Scale. There were strong correlations between DT and RT of all 4 caloric sweeteners across people (r = 0.62–0.90, P < 0.001), and moderate correlations between DT and RT for both of the NNS (r = 0.39–0.48, P < 0.05); however, weaker correlations were observed between the DT or RT of the caloric sweeteners and NNS (r = 0.26–0.48, P < 0.05). The DT and RT of glucose and fructose were not correlated with DT or RT of sucralose (P > 0.05). In contrast, there were strong correlations between the sweetness intensity ratings of all sweeteners (r = 0.70–0.96, P < 0.001). This suggests those caloric sweeteners and NNS access at least partially independent mechanisms with respect to DT and RT measures. At suprathreshold level, however, the strong correlation between caloric sweeteners and NNS through weak, moderate, and strong intensity indicates a commonality in sweet taste mechanism for the perceived intensity range.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5390504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53905042017-04-24 Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners Low, Julia Y.Q. McBride, Robert L. Lacy, Kathleen E. Keast, Russell S.J. Chem Senses Original Article Sweetness is one of the 5 prototypical tastes and is activated by sugars and non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS). The aim of this study was to investigate measures of sweet taste function [detection threshold (DT), recognition threshold (RT), and suprathreshold intensity ratings] across multiple sweeteners. Sixty participants, 18–52 years of age (mean age in years = 26, SD = ±7.8), were recruited to participate in the study. DT and RT were collected for caloric sweeteners (glucose, fructose, sucrose, erythritol) and NNS (sucralose, rebaudioside A). Sweetness intensity for all sweeteners was measured using a general Labeled Magnitude Scale. There were strong correlations between DT and RT of all 4 caloric sweeteners across people (r = 0.62–0.90, P < 0.001), and moderate correlations between DT and RT for both of the NNS (r = 0.39–0.48, P < 0.05); however, weaker correlations were observed between the DT or RT of the caloric sweeteners and NNS (r = 0.26–0.48, P < 0.05). The DT and RT of glucose and fructose were not correlated with DT or RT of sucralose (P > 0.05). In contrast, there were strong correlations between the sweetness intensity ratings of all sweeteners (r = 0.70–0.96, P < 0.001). This suggests those caloric sweeteners and NNS access at least partially independent mechanisms with respect to DT and RT measures. At suprathreshold level, however, the strong correlation between caloric sweeteners and NNS through weak, moderate, and strong intensity indicates a commonality in sweet taste mechanism for the perceived intensity range. Oxford University Press 2017-02 2016-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5390504/ /pubmed/27765786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjw109 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Low, Julia Y.Q.
McBride, Robert L.
Lacy, Kathleen E.
Keast, Russell S.J.
Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners
title Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners
title_full Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners
title_fullStr Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners
title_full_unstemmed Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners
title_short Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners
title_sort psychophysical evaluation of sweetness functions across multiple sweeteners
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5390504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27765786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjw109
work_keys_str_mv AT lowjuliayq psychophysicalevaluationofsweetnessfunctionsacrossmultiplesweeteners
AT mcbriderobertl psychophysicalevaluationofsweetnessfunctionsacrossmultiplesweeteners
AT lacykathleene psychophysicalevaluationofsweetnessfunctionsacrossmultiplesweeteners
AT keastrussellsj psychophysicalevaluationofsweetnessfunctionsacrossmultiplesweeteners