Cargando…
Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners
Sweetness is one of the 5 prototypical tastes and is activated by sugars and non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS). The aim of this study was to investigate measures of sweet taste function [detection threshold (DT), recognition threshold (RT), and suprathreshold intensity ratings] across multiple sweetene...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5390504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27765786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjw109 |
_version_ | 1782521473508835328 |
---|---|
author | Low, Julia Y.Q. McBride, Robert L. Lacy, Kathleen E. Keast, Russell S.J. |
author_facet | Low, Julia Y.Q. McBride, Robert L. Lacy, Kathleen E. Keast, Russell S.J. |
author_sort | Low, Julia Y.Q. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sweetness is one of the 5 prototypical tastes and is activated by sugars and non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS). The aim of this study was to investigate measures of sweet taste function [detection threshold (DT), recognition threshold (RT), and suprathreshold intensity ratings] across multiple sweeteners. Sixty participants, 18–52 years of age (mean age in years = 26, SD = ±7.8), were recruited to participate in the study. DT and RT were collected for caloric sweeteners (glucose, fructose, sucrose, erythritol) and NNS (sucralose, rebaudioside A). Sweetness intensity for all sweeteners was measured using a general Labeled Magnitude Scale. There were strong correlations between DT and RT of all 4 caloric sweeteners across people (r = 0.62–0.90, P < 0.001), and moderate correlations between DT and RT for both of the NNS (r = 0.39–0.48, P < 0.05); however, weaker correlations were observed between the DT or RT of the caloric sweeteners and NNS (r = 0.26–0.48, P < 0.05). The DT and RT of glucose and fructose were not correlated with DT or RT of sucralose (P > 0.05). In contrast, there were strong correlations between the sweetness intensity ratings of all sweeteners (r = 0.70–0.96, P < 0.001). This suggests those caloric sweeteners and NNS access at least partially independent mechanisms with respect to DT and RT measures. At suprathreshold level, however, the strong correlation between caloric sweeteners and NNS through weak, moderate, and strong intensity indicates a commonality in sweet taste mechanism for the perceived intensity range. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5390504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53905042017-04-24 Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners Low, Julia Y.Q. McBride, Robert L. Lacy, Kathleen E. Keast, Russell S.J. Chem Senses Original Article Sweetness is one of the 5 prototypical tastes and is activated by sugars and non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS). The aim of this study was to investigate measures of sweet taste function [detection threshold (DT), recognition threshold (RT), and suprathreshold intensity ratings] across multiple sweeteners. Sixty participants, 18–52 years of age (mean age in years = 26, SD = ±7.8), were recruited to participate in the study. DT and RT were collected for caloric sweeteners (glucose, fructose, sucrose, erythritol) and NNS (sucralose, rebaudioside A). Sweetness intensity for all sweeteners was measured using a general Labeled Magnitude Scale. There were strong correlations between DT and RT of all 4 caloric sweeteners across people (r = 0.62–0.90, P < 0.001), and moderate correlations between DT and RT for both of the NNS (r = 0.39–0.48, P < 0.05); however, weaker correlations were observed between the DT or RT of the caloric sweeteners and NNS (r = 0.26–0.48, P < 0.05). The DT and RT of glucose and fructose were not correlated with DT or RT of sucralose (P > 0.05). In contrast, there were strong correlations between the sweetness intensity ratings of all sweeteners (r = 0.70–0.96, P < 0.001). This suggests those caloric sweeteners and NNS access at least partially independent mechanisms with respect to DT and RT measures. At suprathreshold level, however, the strong correlation between caloric sweeteners and NNS through weak, moderate, and strong intensity indicates a commonality in sweet taste mechanism for the perceived intensity range. Oxford University Press 2017-02 2016-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5390504/ /pubmed/27765786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjw109 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Low, Julia Y.Q. McBride, Robert L. Lacy, Kathleen E. Keast, Russell S.J. Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners |
title | Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners |
title_full | Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners |
title_fullStr | Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners |
title_short | Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners |
title_sort | psychophysical evaluation of sweetness functions across multiple sweeteners |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5390504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27765786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjw109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lowjuliayq psychophysicalevaluationofsweetnessfunctionsacrossmultiplesweeteners AT mcbriderobertl psychophysicalevaluationofsweetnessfunctionsacrossmultiplesweeteners AT lacykathleene psychophysicalevaluationofsweetnessfunctionsacrossmultiplesweeteners AT keastrussellsj psychophysicalevaluationofsweetnessfunctionsacrossmultiplesweeteners |