Cargando…
The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction
Telomeres are protected by shelterin, a six-subunit protein complex that represses the DNA damage response (DDR) at chromosome ends. Extensive data suggest that TRF2 in shelterin remodels telomeres into the t-loop structure, thereby hiding telomere ends from double-stranded break repair and ATM sign...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28381412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.294108.116 |
_version_ | 1783229523370704896 |
---|---|
author | Timashev, Leonid A. Babcock, Hazen Zhuang, Xiaowei de Lange, Titia |
author_facet | Timashev, Leonid A. Babcock, Hazen Zhuang, Xiaowei de Lange, Titia |
author_sort | Timashev, Leonid A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Telomeres are protected by shelterin, a six-subunit protein complex that represses the DNA damage response (DDR) at chromosome ends. Extensive data suggest that TRF2 in shelterin remodels telomeres into the t-loop structure, thereby hiding telomere ends from double-stranded break repair and ATM signaling, whereas POT1 represses ATR signaling by excluding RPA. An alternative protection mechanism was suggested recently by which shelterin subunits TRF1, TRF2, and TIN2 mediate telomeric chromatin compaction, which was proposed to minimize access of DDR factors. We performed superresolution imaging of telomeres in mouse cells after conditional deletion of TRF1, TRF2, or both, the latter of which results in the complete loss of shelterin. Upon removal of TRF1 or TRF2, we observed only minor changes in the telomere volume in most of our experiments. Upon codeletion of TRF1 and TRF2, the telomere volume increased by varying amounts, but even those samples exhibiting small changes in telomere volume showed DDR at nearly all telomeres. Upon shelterin removal, telomeres underwent 53BP1-dependent clustering, potentially explaining at least in part the apparent increase in telomere volume. Furthermore, chromatin accessibility, as determined by ATAC-seq (assay for transposase-accessible chromatin [ATAC] with high-throughput sequencing), was not substantially altered by shelterin removal. These results suggest that the DDR induced by shelterin removal does not require substantial telomere decompaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5393053 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53930532017-09-15 The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction Timashev, Leonid A. Babcock, Hazen Zhuang, Xiaowei de Lange, Titia Genes Dev Research Paper Telomeres are protected by shelterin, a six-subunit protein complex that represses the DNA damage response (DDR) at chromosome ends. Extensive data suggest that TRF2 in shelterin remodels telomeres into the t-loop structure, thereby hiding telomere ends from double-stranded break repair and ATM signaling, whereas POT1 represses ATR signaling by excluding RPA. An alternative protection mechanism was suggested recently by which shelterin subunits TRF1, TRF2, and TIN2 mediate telomeric chromatin compaction, which was proposed to minimize access of DDR factors. We performed superresolution imaging of telomeres in mouse cells after conditional deletion of TRF1, TRF2, or both, the latter of which results in the complete loss of shelterin. Upon removal of TRF1 or TRF2, we observed only minor changes in the telomere volume in most of our experiments. Upon codeletion of TRF1 and TRF2, the telomere volume increased by varying amounts, but even those samples exhibiting small changes in telomere volume showed DDR at nearly all telomeres. Upon shelterin removal, telomeres underwent 53BP1-dependent clustering, potentially explaining at least in part the apparent increase in telomere volume. Furthermore, chromatin accessibility, as determined by ATAC-seq (assay for transposase-accessible chromatin [ATAC] with high-throughput sequencing), was not substantially altered by shelterin removal. These results suggest that the DDR induced by shelterin removal does not require substantial telomere decompaction. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2017-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5393053/ /pubmed/28381412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.294108.116 Text en © 2017 Timashev et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genesdev.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Timashev, Leonid A. Babcock, Hazen Zhuang, Xiaowei de Lange, Titia The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction |
title | The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction |
title_full | The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction |
title_fullStr | The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction |
title_full_unstemmed | The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction |
title_short | The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction |
title_sort | ddr at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28381412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.294108.116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT timashevleonida theddrattelomereslackingintactshelterindoesnotrequiresubstantialchromatindecompaction AT babcockhazen theddrattelomereslackingintactshelterindoesnotrequiresubstantialchromatindecompaction AT zhuangxiaowei theddrattelomereslackingintactshelterindoesnotrequiresubstantialchromatindecompaction AT delangetitia theddrattelomereslackingintactshelterindoesnotrequiresubstantialchromatindecompaction AT timashevleonida ddrattelomereslackingintactshelterindoesnotrequiresubstantialchromatindecompaction AT babcockhazen ddrattelomereslackingintactshelterindoesnotrequiresubstantialchromatindecompaction AT zhuangxiaowei ddrattelomereslackingintactshelterindoesnotrequiresubstantialchromatindecompaction AT delangetitia ddrattelomereslackingintactshelterindoesnotrequiresubstantialchromatindecompaction |