Cargando…

The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction

Telomeres are protected by shelterin, a six-subunit protein complex that represses the DNA damage response (DDR) at chromosome ends. Extensive data suggest that TRF2 in shelterin remodels telomeres into the t-loop structure, thereby hiding telomere ends from double-stranded break repair and ATM sign...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Timashev, Leonid A., Babcock, Hazen, Zhuang, Xiaowei, de Lange, Titia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28381412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.294108.116
_version_ 1783229523370704896
author Timashev, Leonid A.
Babcock, Hazen
Zhuang, Xiaowei
de Lange, Titia
author_facet Timashev, Leonid A.
Babcock, Hazen
Zhuang, Xiaowei
de Lange, Titia
author_sort Timashev, Leonid A.
collection PubMed
description Telomeres are protected by shelterin, a six-subunit protein complex that represses the DNA damage response (DDR) at chromosome ends. Extensive data suggest that TRF2 in shelterin remodels telomeres into the t-loop structure, thereby hiding telomere ends from double-stranded break repair and ATM signaling, whereas POT1 represses ATR signaling by excluding RPA. An alternative protection mechanism was suggested recently by which shelterin subunits TRF1, TRF2, and TIN2 mediate telomeric chromatin compaction, which was proposed to minimize access of DDR factors. We performed superresolution imaging of telomeres in mouse cells after conditional deletion of TRF1, TRF2, or both, the latter of which results in the complete loss of shelterin. Upon removal of TRF1 or TRF2, we observed only minor changes in the telomere volume in most of our experiments. Upon codeletion of TRF1 and TRF2, the telomere volume increased by varying amounts, but even those samples exhibiting small changes in telomere volume showed DDR at nearly all telomeres. Upon shelterin removal, telomeres underwent 53BP1-dependent clustering, potentially explaining at least in part the apparent increase in telomere volume. Furthermore, chromatin accessibility, as determined by ATAC-seq (assay for transposase-accessible chromatin [ATAC] with high-throughput sequencing), was not substantially altered by shelterin removal. These results suggest that the DDR induced by shelterin removal does not require substantial telomere decompaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5393053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53930532017-09-15 The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction Timashev, Leonid A. Babcock, Hazen Zhuang, Xiaowei de Lange, Titia Genes Dev Research Paper Telomeres are protected by shelterin, a six-subunit protein complex that represses the DNA damage response (DDR) at chromosome ends. Extensive data suggest that TRF2 in shelterin remodels telomeres into the t-loop structure, thereby hiding telomere ends from double-stranded break repair and ATM signaling, whereas POT1 represses ATR signaling by excluding RPA. An alternative protection mechanism was suggested recently by which shelterin subunits TRF1, TRF2, and TIN2 mediate telomeric chromatin compaction, which was proposed to minimize access of DDR factors. We performed superresolution imaging of telomeres in mouse cells after conditional deletion of TRF1, TRF2, or both, the latter of which results in the complete loss of shelterin. Upon removal of TRF1 or TRF2, we observed only minor changes in the telomere volume in most of our experiments. Upon codeletion of TRF1 and TRF2, the telomere volume increased by varying amounts, but even those samples exhibiting small changes in telomere volume showed DDR at nearly all telomeres. Upon shelterin removal, telomeres underwent 53BP1-dependent clustering, potentially explaining at least in part the apparent increase in telomere volume. Furthermore, chromatin accessibility, as determined by ATAC-seq (assay for transposase-accessible chromatin [ATAC] with high-throughput sequencing), was not substantially altered by shelterin removal. These results suggest that the DDR induced by shelterin removal does not require substantial telomere decompaction. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2017-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5393053/ /pubmed/28381412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.294108.116 Text en © 2017 Timashev et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genesdev.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Timashev, Leonid A.
Babcock, Hazen
Zhuang, Xiaowei
de Lange, Titia
The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction
title The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction
title_full The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction
title_fullStr The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction
title_full_unstemmed The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction
title_short The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction
title_sort ddr at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28381412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.294108.116
work_keys_str_mv AT timashevleonida theddrattelomereslackingintactshelterindoesnotrequiresubstantialchromatindecompaction
AT babcockhazen theddrattelomereslackingintactshelterindoesnotrequiresubstantialchromatindecompaction
AT zhuangxiaowei theddrattelomereslackingintactshelterindoesnotrequiresubstantialchromatindecompaction
AT delangetitia theddrattelomereslackingintactshelterindoesnotrequiresubstantialchromatindecompaction
AT timashevleonida ddrattelomereslackingintactshelterindoesnotrequiresubstantialchromatindecompaction
AT babcockhazen ddrattelomereslackingintactshelterindoesnotrequiresubstantialchromatindecompaction
AT zhuangxiaowei ddrattelomereslackingintactshelterindoesnotrequiresubstantialchromatindecompaction
AT delangetitia ddrattelomereslackingintactshelterindoesnotrequiresubstantialchromatindecompaction