Cargando…
Object recognition combining vision and touch
This paper explores ways of combining vision and touch for the purpose of object recognition. In particular, it focuses on scenarios when there are few tactile training samples (as these are usually costly to obtain) and when vision is artificially impaired. Whilst machine vision is a widely studied...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40638-017-0058-2 |
_version_ | 1783229894432391168 |
---|---|
author | Corradi, Tadeo Hall, Peter Iravani, Pejman |
author_facet | Corradi, Tadeo Hall, Peter Iravani, Pejman |
author_sort | Corradi, Tadeo |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper explores ways of combining vision and touch for the purpose of object recognition. In particular, it focuses on scenarios when there are few tactile training samples (as these are usually costly to obtain) and when vision is artificially impaired. Whilst machine vision is a widely studied field, and machine touch has received some attention recently, the fusion of both modalities remains a relatively unexplored area. It has been suggested that, in the human brain, there exist shared multi-sensorial representations of objects. This provides robustness when one or more senses are absent or unreliable. Modern robotics systems can benefit from multi-sensorial input, in particular in contexts where one or more of the sensors perform poorly. In this paper, a recently proposed tactile recognition model was extended by integrating a simple vision system in three different ways: vector concatenation (vision feature vector and tactile feature vector), object label posterior averaging and object label posterior product. A comparison is drawn in terms of overall accuracy of recognition and in terms of how quickly (number of training samples) learning occurs. The conclusions reached are: (1) the most accurate system is “posterior product”, (2) multi-modal recognition has higher accuracy to either modality alone if all visual and tactile training data are pooled together, and (3) in the case of visual impairment, multi-modal recognition “learns faster”, i.e. requires fewer training samples to achieve the same accuracy as either other modality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5395591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53955912017-05-04 Object recognition combining vision and touch Corradi, Tadeo Hall, Peter Iravani, Pejman Robotics Biomim Research This paper explores ways of combining vision and touch for the purpose of object recognition. In particular, it focuses on scenarios when there are few tactile training samples (as these are usually costly to obtain) and when vision is artificially impaired. Whilst machine vision is a widely studied field, and machine touch has received some attention recently, the fusion of both modalities remains a relatively unexplored area. It has been suggested that, in the human brain, there exist shared multi-sensorial representations of objects. This provides robustness when one or more senses are absent or unreliable. Modern robotics systems can benefit from multi-sensorial input, in particular in contexts where one or more of the sensors perform poorly. In this paper, a recently proposed tactile recognition model was extended by integrating a simple vision system in three different ways: vector concatenation (vision feature vector and tactile feature vector), object label posterior averaging and object label posterior product. A comparison is drawn in terms of overall accuracy of recognition and in terms of how quickly (number of training samples) learning occurs. The conclusions reached are: (1) the most accurate system is “posterior product”, (2) multi-modal recognition has higher accuracy to either modality alone if all visual and tactile training data are pooled together, and (3) in the case of visual impairment, multi-modal recognition “learns faster”, i.e. requires fewer training samples to achieve the same accuracy as either other modality. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-04-18 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5395591/ /pubmed/28480157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40638-017-0058-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Corradi, Tadeo Hall, Peter Iravani, Pejman Object recognition combining vision and touch |
title | Object recognition combining vision and touch |
title_full | Object recognition combining vision and touch |
title_fullStr | Object recognition combining vision and touch |
title_full_unstemmed | Object recognition combining vision and touch |
title_short | Object recognition combining vision and touch |
title_sort | object recognition combining vision and touch |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40638-017-0058-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT corraditadeo objectrecognitioncombiningvisionandtouch AT hallpeter objectrecognitioncombiningvisionandtouch AT iravanipejman objectrecognitioncombiningvisionandtouch |